@BigVern
POST
THE
TROJAN
WALLET
I think it is on github edit: see post above this one |
|
|
|
Show of hands ? How many people are genuinely surprised ? About time they came clean. I am a bit surprised how utterly idiotic this is. Poor security practices, trying to conceal huge loss, letting the site bomb completely before coming clean... but yeah, a hack was something most predicted. Ya like he takes a pre-compiled LuckCoin wallet and runs it on his machine with ties to millions in customer funds ? Further more i already heard waaaay back that they have to compile the wallets themselves so that has to be a lie ! No real exchange runs precompiled wallets. First, they use Linux for backends. Windows is plain insecure. Second, to fire up a wallet released by an unknown dev without a code review? Never going to happen. If Mullick reviewed the code on every wallet then he was one fast motherfucker. He was a slow one actually. However he didn't need to do a complete review on every wallet update. He only needed to browse though those last commits. Look at that shitcoin: https://github.com/alerj78/lucky7coin/commits/masterTwo last ones are harmless, however "Import lucky7coin" is fishy. Not a fork, not a rebase, just an import of who knows what. If they let it in, they were idiots in crypto business. hmm interesting. r u Patrick? |
|
|
|
So basically Mullick approved the Lucky7Coin wallet that was infected. That was his job after all.
NO they said on chat before they get the code and compile it.. So they got source code and missed the Trojan ? Do you guys think Exchanges just go to Bitcointalk forums and download every Windows QT that gets posted ? LOL Well I know he did exactly that on at least one occasion. I sent him the link, lol. |
|
|
|
Show of hands ? How many people are genuinely surprised ? About time they came clean. I am a bit surprised how utterly idiotic this is. Poor security practices, trying to conceal huge loss, letting the site bomb completely before coming clean... but yeah, a hack was something most predicted. Ya like he takes a pre-compiled LuckCoin wallet and runs it on his machine with ties to millions in customer funds ? Further more i already heard waaaay back that they have to compile the wallets themselves so that has to be a lie ! No real exchange runs precompiled wallets. First, they use Linux for backends. Windows is plain insecure. Second, to fire up a wallet released by an unknown dev without a code review? Never going to happen. If Mullick reviewed the code on every wallet then he was one fast motherfucker. Also, I know for a fact that he approved at least one wallet for a coin that had a hidden premine. Someone else figured it out after it had been live for quite some time. |
|
|
|
|
Did I mention that I'm a bit upset?
|
|
|
|
Show of hands ? How many people are genuinely surprised ? About time they came clean. I am a bit surprised how utterly idiotic this is. Poor security practices, trying to conceal huge loss, letting the site bomb completely before coming clean... but yeah, a hack was something most predicted. Ya like he takes a pre-compiled LuckCoin wallet and runs it on his machine with ties to millions in customer funds ? Further more i already heard waaaay back that they have to compile the wallets themselves so that has to be a lie ! This is how it worked. You send a github link to Mullick and he compiles it for their server. Just because they compile it themselves doesn't mean that they do a full code review. Correct |
|
|
|
Show of hands ? How many people are genuinely surprised ? About time they came clean. I am a bit surprised how utterly idiotic this is. Poor security practices, trying to conceal huge loss, letting the site bomb completely before coming clean... but yeah, a hack was something most predicted. Ya like he takes a pre-compiled LuckCoin wallet and runs it on his machine with ties to millions in customer funds ? Further more i already heard waaaay back that they have to compile the wallets themselves so that has to be a lie ! This is how it worked. You send a github link to Mullick and he compiles it for their server. |
|
|
|
Yes, the cat is out of the bag. |
|
|
|
This BigVern's story is an utter bullshit.
1. How come he could run BTC, LTC and some unknown shitcoin wallets within the same physical machine AND virtual machine? I don't do this even on my desktop!
2. 13,000 BTC and 300,000 LTC in HOT wallets? BTC was about $580 and LTC $7.5 at the alleged theft time. That's a grand total of nearly $10 million! Again, in hot wallets? Are you fucking kidding me?
3. All wallets on exchange MUST be encrypted with their keys stored elsewhere in top security. Even if a wallet server is compromised, nothing can be sent out without knowledge of these keys. That's a no-brainer.
Patrick? |
|
|
|
So basically Mullick approved the Lucky7Coin wallet that was infected. That was his job after all.
Is there an echo in here? |
|
|
|
|
So basically Mullick approved the Lucky7Coin wallet that was infected. That was his job after all.
|
|
|
|
Hehe, this is just a mockup mate  We are still working on the UI/UX of the secondary tabs and will post those as they get completed as well -- just wanted to show the progress along the way. ahh, well then that makes more sense, heh. I have WATER stuck in Bittrex that could be earning 8% interest in my wallet, it is a little frustrating.  |
|
|
|
2014-07-31 at 07:12pm EST: Since NiceHash changed the minimum X11 pool difficulty for X11 to 0.2 -- please use 4000 for X11 from NiceHash (east02,east03 or am01 are the best stratum options)
What does it mean? Is it better to use that port, instead of 4011? Or is it not a multi-switching port?
Is veilcoin being autotrade?
' NiceHash renting quit working on the standard X11 multiport because they required the minimum pool difficulty to be 0.2, port 4000 is an X11 multiport that starts at 0.2 difficulty (mostly just for nicehash, or other large farms).. it's not an algo swapping port. Veil is autoexchanged, but the reason its not on the multiport is that its depth is -extremely- thin.. cannot promise you'll get anywhere near market value if you mine a substantial amount ok, I'm stupid. What does TMB have to do with nicehash? I thought these were basically competing "pools". Can you explain this like I'm a complete idiot? thanks |
|
|
|
We are lucky to have psionin as our dev. Yet I still am not seeing the love for smartcoin that it deserves. |
|
|
|
New Wallet Design:Here is a sneak peek at the new wallet that we plan on rolling out with the mandatory update.
Let us know what you think!  Very nice! Just one question. How were you able to deposit WATER to Bittrex on 7/29? I tried to send WATER to Bittrex on 7/29 and not only did the coins never make it but they are not even pending. It seems a little unfair and shady that no one but you can deposit WATER to Bittrex. |
|
|
|
I do lots of simulations in order to make sure that everything will work as it should, trying to be as proactive as I can be.
During one of my simulations, I spotted issues that may arise in the immediate future if not all users not update their wallets before they connect to the network. So, I had to do all the required steps to prevent that.
I'm sorry that I'm slow (to some people's measures) but I prefer to take it slow and release something that passed some QA tests, than have it blow in your face while normal usage. Wouldn't you agree?
Agreed, I'm not complaining, thanks for your thoroughness! |
|
|
|
|
When this goes PoS I will have officially stopped mining scrypt coins completely. I'm ready for block 112,000.
|
|
|
|
|
Well guys I'm going to try back later after the dev has a look at things. take care bros
|
|
|
|
Can anyone get a wallet to sync? Where is the dev?
I haven't tried a windows wallet yet. The pool wallet took a little coaxing. try addnode=184.180.177.220 I will give it a try, thanks. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
