Coins with active github development can not be considered as shitcoins.
They will reach to good values if they keep improving their code...
How can they achieve good grades when the code is improved ? wouldn't a token value be seen if the buying demand could increase every day in the market? I'm a little confused by what you say, try to explain more fully. |
|
|
|
I heard Origin Protocol is helping to build online stores with crypto merch for different projects, you should visit their website. They also offer Origin Deals - a way to get a discount on Amazon by holding OGN tokens.
This looks very funny, because there was a Origin project in this forum that ended with a scam, so be careful if you want to find a bonus by holding an OGN token, because the Origin project's reputation in this forum is no longer good in everyone's eyes. |
|
|
|
Some shitcoins are shitcoins because they lack real use case or they are build by money grabbers but some good coins are mistakenly taken as shitcoins because of slow development or called shitcoins because people don't meet their expectations
It would be very ridiculous too if some people consider shitcoin on a coin because it does not meet their expectations, because the evaluation of shitcoin does not lie in the expectations of some people but in real use cases. |
|
|
|
It is project's responsibility to not fall into scammer's hands and also to have a good media presence. Good ideas and good intentions are not enough to succeed.
Yes, and good cooperation partners are also very much needed for the strength of the project financially and the strength of the project in its basic foundation, because it is very clear that for the time being a good idea will not be interesting anymore in a project. |
|
|
|
yes enough with these projects.. but the thing is we cannot control them, people behind on those upcoming projects.. there are a lot of projects that are coming but its always the same ideas.. If the developer only knows what are the ideas that are missing in this crypto world then we are not seeing those repetitive projects and ideas. They should try a new idea.
Yes, the project developer should try new ideas for now, especially now that there are several projects that apply the same ideas to new projects, this automatically provides opportunities for other project developers to build new ideas so they can attract attention investors at this time. |
|
|
|
Online jobs are the most convenient profession in my opinion. No pressure, no time limit, and no tiring energy going to office and back and forth. I know that is rare to find a job that suited for this, but many people have some thoughts and idea on how to earn. One of this is making ads or selling goods. But for me, doing crypto sideline like in here while learning good knowledge is better. But always remember that using forum as a money maker is not good way to see it as alternate job. View it as privilege not just some work you can do all day.
In the most important online job it is a way of working so that someone does not experience a loss of time, because doing work online does not have to have a large capital, it just takes a lot of time to be successful, because everyone has the desire to be successful, but not all people have a good way of working to be able to find success through online. |
|
|
|
Your suggestion is very good, where we can avoid the bounty project that is crowded with participants because the more crowded the participants, the allocation of funds we get will also be less and we also have to see bounties that have a chance of success later
In general, a good campaign is always a lot of followers, because every bounty hunter is obviously always looking for a good bounty campaign not a bad one, so in this case what must be considered is the number of token allocations given to the campaign, apart from the number of participants, because many bounty campaigns whose followers are lonely because they are not qualified, do you want to follow a campaign that is not qualified ? |
|
|
|
Well you can barely find such bounty manager like him who really cares not only for him for the bounty hunters as well. Most of the BM's right now don't really care wether the project is good and going to be successful or not as long as their have something they can get running the projects. I hope every BM follows his lead and not only thinking about themselves but their bounty hunters as well cause a project's success is BM and bounty hunters' success as well.
Now it is very difficult to find BM who care about bounty hunters, the main thing they care about is themselves, in contrast to the past where BM was more concerned with bounty participants as well as themselves, because BM also received payment from the project, so there was no his fault if a BM should also be more concerned with bounty participants. |
|
|
|
Many things happened during the era of ICOs and I wouldn't be surprised if it actually took place, but to the best of my knowledge, ICO is different from IEO where ICO takes place on the website of the project. Nowadays, since IEO is the order of the day, all buying of tokens takes place on the exchange alone unless they will host a private sell first, then move to exchange to finish up but in all cases, once IEO starts no more token will be sold except on the exchange.
Yes, and one more thing is that by name both of them already look different, although the goal is also almost the same, namely selling tokens during the fundraising period so that the project can be successful, only in this case the ICO looks weaker so that the scammers are very easy to take advantage of the ICO's weaknesses for them make it a fraud field. |
|
|
|
Such a strategy makes sense, but you know, what I would also say - it is not easy to find multiple solutions that meet requirements. What I mean is evaluating the factors. From my point of view, platform must be advanced, reliable and, of course, bring real and practical value
A very good point of view, but you also have to know that many platform developers have had success in the past, because they developed the platform according to the needs of many people, and that also included a desire from a developer. |
|
|
|
If you want to develop an ICO project in order to succeed then for now it needs a maximum process because many investors are not convinced anymore invest in the ICO project because many are experiencing losses and some of the investors have already switched to IEO, and nowadays there are some ICO projects doing exchanges with potential coins and they can finish the project to the end.
Yes, and if you don't want to get tired and don't want to be disappointed, then it's better not to develop ICO projects anymore, because people's responses to ICO have faded and they don't even include investors' responses, so develop projects that are better than ICO for now. |
|
|
|
Dogecoin is a meme coin back in the days, many look at this coin as another shitcoin but those who knew it's capability keeps filling their bags, dogecoin is pretty fast and has very cheap transaction fee.
Yes, for those who do not know Dogecoin, they will definitely say that Dogecoin is shitcoin because they only see in terms of low prices, even though the transaction and shipping costs are very fast and very cheap if we compare it to other Altcoins. |
|
|
|
There are a lot of Altcoins which can be profitable even in the longterm. ETH, BNB and LTC are very good coins for investment, in general it is better to find more good coins for investment to minimize the risks. Yes, to minimize the risk of loss in terms of investment it is necessary to choose the best Altcoin, because the new Altcoin is not necessarily included in the best Altcoin category, so the risk of loss is likely still large. |
|
|
|
Investing in Ethereum is a wise decision becouse of the stability this coin offer and also due to the volume. From WorldCoinIndex it shows that Ethereum is the second best coin with the most growth in 90days. I think now it's the right moment to buy Ethereum. Ethereum tokens are always good to buy, both when prices are down and when prices are rising, because the volume of demand is always large in all markets, and for ranking issues not only in WorldCoinIndex in number two, but in coingecko and coinmarketcap are also in order number two for Ethereum tokens. |
|
|
|
I'm in full agreement to the fact that the success of an IEO lies in the exchange. This is simply because the trust has shifted from the project in the case of ICO, to the exchange in the case of IEO. A large portion of investors in a projects IEO are the normal traders of the exchange.
Yes, and everyone clearly agrees on that, because there has been much evidence that the average IEO is successful through a good exchange, because if the IEO fails, then certainly the exchange is less clear, so investors and traders don't dare to use that exchange. |
|
|
|
The bounty have been extended twice now, this will surely makes some bounty hunters get angry, sometimes it's really unfair and time wasting if I have to judge with past bounties experience, some will end up not paying, the choice is yours OP, if you think it's not safe to continue then leave
Yes, if the bounty is extended for reasons that sales have not been maximized, then the amount of the allocation is worth adding, if the team does not make additional allocations, the bounty hunters will obviously lose in terms of time. |
|
|
|
Nah! Bounty Hunters aren't going to be United on this one, some bounty hunters are so satisfied with the results they are getting from bounties, while you walk away from projects others don't mind joining
That's a very reasonable thing, because every bounty hunter certainly works for himself using his own time, so the problem of being satisfied or not with the payment he receives has nothing to do with other people. |
|
|
|
yes, we are only rich in spreadsheets. Many projects carry out that strategy, but they don't think first about their image and reputation. In this case the bounty hunters will suffer because of lost time and effort that they have wasted for this kind of project. I hope there is a good solution that can eliminate fraud projects in this forum.
What you say doesn't match what I see, you just joined 3 projects that are still running, precisely on June 19, 2020, but I'm a little surprised why you say "we're only rich in spreadsheets"? even though you haven't joined in several projects that have ended, this looks funny because you are so knowledgeable |
|
|
|
The airdrop asking KYC of everyone involved is bullshit. That's just the act of selling your information to others. So never do it foolishly, you will surely get in trouble in the future
Yes, because basically the Airdrop program is free without asking anything to the participants, whether it's KYC or some kind of payment for a token claim from Aidrop, so don't give anything to Airdrop especially Airdrop which currently has many unclear origins. |
|
|
|
Some of their bounties i actually joined. But the problem for me i think that they list bounties that has no potential of getting in a market. Which lead them to their downfall. Because if you will manage a bounty be sure that it is legit and they will pay-up and most importantly earn you money in the long run.
Yes, that's right, but I see a lot of projects that seem to lack potential in the market and there are very few interested ones so that the value of many tokens has fallen in price, I'm not saying they are legitimate or not, but I see that many current projects have no sale value and developments for the better. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
