Bottom line is Blakecoin devs are not responsible for losses on exchange for Any reason
this is still beta software same goes for BTC thats why I point out the MIT licence that this project uses which is in conflict with what they have asked for in 5. *so in other words they are asking something that goes against Blakecoin's MIT Licence
the MIT licence is pretty open they could use the code they could run mod core wallet(Mt.Gox style) but its at their risk as per the licence its not the liability of Blakecoin devs!
if a network issue was to happen no way will we be forced to rollback tx/block addresses or change the blockchain over an exchange, of course we would try and resolve issues but thats not same as being held liable for losses which just seems crazy especially as we all know how much risk is involved and how much of an attack surface exchanges are
2. is common as muck most exchanges have min vol requirements and as said to me "its just business" but its also why the vol on almost all exchanges is bit bs and some times just pure manipulation as often its built into the listing "Deal" requirements needless to say Devs dont get 0% trade fees on Any exchange we pay same as everyone else!!!!
what some of these exchanges want either extreme high listing fees or odd rules/requirements kind of makes it a deal breaker we still ask and check the details but some are just no go, others might be wait off until we have more organic growth to support the vol
anyways keep an eye out and let me know if you see any others will get them checked out and an application in if suitable
Of course, I was just looking at the trees and not the forest by just focusing on the license and not the content of their requirements. Obviously, I agree that NO crypto developer should be responsible for losses on exchanges or and I firmly disagree that developers or ANYONE should be "propping up" an exchange just because volumes are lower.
An exchange should function because it exists and unlike fiat currency there is a very low storage cost compared to a huge limited-volume bank vault for currency that aren't moving as much as more actively traded currencies. In fact, the exchange , like in the real world with normal paper-money exchanges should be trying to move the currency that they have even if that involves a discount. Fobbing it off on the developers or anyone else is frankly a conflict of interest by the way that I see it.
Of course, that and an X amount in your local currency will buy you a coffee.
CreativeReef