Hahaha, again with the same example? Once again, one good coinjoin does not excuse all the flawed ones. Do you honestly not understand this?

Still, even Max Hillebrand has admitted that Wasabi suffers from address reuse. You should probably download the latest version of "Wasabi bullshit soundbites.pdf". 

So a user imports a Wasabi wallet in to Samourai, doesn't let it sync, and Samourai uses an address it thinks is empty? OMG, Samourai bad!
Samourai release a responsible disclosure addressing address reuse and the steps taken to fix it. OMG, Samourai bad!

Wasabi try to deny address reuse happens despite blockchain evidence of it happening, and just endlessly hand wave about other clients? This is fine.

Lmao. Do you want a hand moving those goalposts again? You must be getting tired.

Because Wasabi wallet automatically picks addresses?

If a JoinMarket user picks a reused address to send a coinjoin output to, that's their fault.
If a Wasabi client automatically picks a reused address to send a coinjoin output to with zero input or even awareness from the user, that's Wasabi's fault.

Three pages ago your excuse was that output was the whale, so it's apparently fine that user gets zero privacy. Now your excuse is it's not a coinjoin at all? Might want to decide which bullshit you are going to stick with.

I do. I choose JoinMarket or Whirlpool, so my fee isn't directly funding mass surveillance of the blockchain.

This is awesome, and I'm keen to give it a try.

As an added bonus, could a user not essentially send money from one note they own to another note they own, thereby gaining even more privacy since at that point even you wouldn't know if they had sent money to someone else or just back to themselves?

Can you do this with an unfunded note? What I mean is, if I want to use pay to note to pay another user, do they need to have a funded note already, or can they create an empty note for me to pay to?

Now I'm certain you are trolling. But for the avoidance of doubt:


There are plenty more examples of the same issues.

The difference here is my wallets aren't charging me a fee which they are using to directly fund blockchain analysis companies to look as closely as possible at my UTXOs.

Why indeed! Why use vaccines which work, when we could use homeopathy which doesn't? It's a real conundrum! I'm sure this meeting of Bitcointalk's finest anti-vax minds will figure it out though!

So you are just going to stick to the "Here is one good example, please don't look at the blockchain evidence of all the flawed ones" approach? All caps doesn't make it any less of a stupid argument, you know.

Again, I'm going to remind everyone that if you use Wasabi, you are literally paying for the privilege of having a blockchain analysis company stick their noses in to your UTXOs.

You can tap where it says "Target:" to change it between static/mempool/ETA. If you change it to static, you should be able to select 1 sat/vbyte.

However, there is no point at the moment. Your transaction won't be broadcast since most nodes are currently hitting the default memory limit.

Waiting any longer will not achieve anything (unless you wait for the mempool to completely empty, but that could take months). Most nodes have dropped your transaction already, and even if you try to rebroadcast it most nodes won't pick it up since their mempools have already hit the memory limit.

You need to make a new transaction. Your options to do this are either to find a way to delete the transaction from your software so you can spend the coins again, or if you can't do that, export the necessary private keys of the UTXOs you are trying to spend and import them elsewhere. The first option will be much easier. You say you are not running Core - what software are you running?

I think you'll find there is nothing artificial about our merit cycling!

Absolutely right once again. Chickenpox is the only preventable disease we have a vaccine against. Let's just ignore the literal billions of children over the last few centuries who have died of measles, mumps, rubella, diphtheria, meningitis, pertussis, polio, smallpox, tetanus, hepatitis, rotavirus...

Seems like drinking so much urine has clouded your memory. Your anti-vax pals were espousing drinking cow urine: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5380868.msg59869858#msg59869858

I have been very vocal over many years about the stupidity of endless money printing that most major governments take part in. This doesn't change the facts of COVID.

So all my colleagues and I just mass hallucinated spending months in COVID ICU surrounded by people younger than us dying on a daily basis?

Oh, my bad! Apparently coinjoins failing completely at what they are designed to do and having outputs which can be 100% linked to specific inputs is not a flaw.

Lol. You have already made it abundantly clear that you have absolutely no issue whatsoever with a so called "privacy" solution actively funding blockchain analysis, mass surveillance, and censorship. In any rational persons' book, these things are mutually exclusive.

I have already shown you blockchain evidence of the following:

Wasabi coinjoins creating outputs which can be 100% linked to a specific input: https://mempool.space/tx/dae13b2d015587a3033d7ab7949a7efa6d6ed7aa782168b0651ab37a2d8390f8
Wasabi coinjoins reusing addresses, leading to users being doxxed: https://nitter.it/ErgoBTC/status/1585671294783311872
Wasabi coinjoins using the same address on both sides of a transaction: https://mempool.space/tx/af50a27691c0f0b7b626cddb74445a0e26bb6ed7b045861067326ea173bc17d0 (address bc1qft2uze947wtdvvhdqtx00c8el954y6ekxjk73h)

For you then to provide a single example which works well does absolutely nothing to address the fact in many cases Wasabi coinjoins are critically flawed. As per my previous analogy, a car manufacturer showing a new model which works well does not excuse previous models which have randomly burst in to flames. This is an incredibly simple concept, so I can only assume you are trolling by continuing to deliberately misunderstand it.

Yes yes, you've repeated this meaningless soundbite a dozen times now. You pay a blockchain analysis company for information on every single UTXO which attempts to register for a coinjoin. You actively support mass surveillance.

You mean apart from the address reuse and the identifiable outputs? Probably something to do with them not being run by a company which supports mass surveillance of all their users.

Haha, OK then. Whatever you need to tell yourself to justify selling out.

He means a one click installer for a coordinator.

Still, why would I go through the effort of setting up a coordinator, having zero volume, trying to entice people to my coordinator, all so I can run inferior coinjoins with suffer from address reuse and identifiable outputs, when I can just run JoinMarket instead?

Do you purchase services from blockchain analysis entities?

(It's a yes or no question. No need to try to argue pointless semantics.)

No, better to just let children needlessly die of preventable diseases. What an absolutely monstrous opinion to hold.

Also pretty telling that this thread has devolved in to anti-vaxxers genuinely, and without a hint of irony, discussing the benefits of drinking their own piss.

Wrong. All you've actually done is follow some unmixed change - change which is deliberately segregated so as not to impact the privacy of the coinjoin. You haven't deanonymized a single Whirlpool output.

It is helpful for the community to know that Wasabi contributors hold views which are so antithetical to privacy, censorship resistance, the avoidance of third parties, and the general ethos of bitcoin. It helps them to make an informed decision to not go anywhere near your permissioned, mass surveillance software.

It absolutely isn't.

If you desperately want to commit something to memory (although as I explain below that's a terrible back up method), then just memorize the seed phrase or use 8-20 words as an encryption key using a standard encryption algorithm, and not some homemade harebrained scheme.

Here is why you should absolutely never rely on your memory for any critical information or back up:

Again, I'm not arguing that fact, but that doesn't excuse CZ's actions.

Well of course! Banks buy out our politicians and law makers, so they get a free pass to do what they like and launder trillions of dollars.