I don't think we are going to see him in this thread again. I am just curious what kind of defense he is going to come up with.

A Chief Financial Officer/Treasurer... Wow

Then i guess he shouldn't have a problem signing a message from any of the following donation bitcoin addresses that appeared on his profile at one point as per the archives



Prove to us that you are the original account owner  @deadsea33 or the thread you just opened in protest to a mere neutral tag is just going to open more cans of worms.

If you look at the pic in the tweet. It pretty much states how ChatGPT is going to help. CHAT-LN as it's called will be specialized in Bitcoin and LN development.

It will have nothing to do with sending LN transactions or performing BTC transactions. It will mainly be used for scripting, troubleshooting, providing examples of working code etc.

I have one simple question

What was your relationship with IXcoin project? Were you the owner/developer?

I need to know if i can trust you or give you a benefit of doubt. Don't even try to lie. It won't help.

I guess requesting a signed message from an old staked address should be part of procedure from now on. These streets are really so slippery  

---

Sorry about terrible ordeal OP and Shashan

He is saying that he will be your contact person in China

Want to buy shoes? He will do it for you and ship it to you. Want to invest in real estate in China, he will be your contact person

IMO, there is no way you can trust such a stranger with zero reputation, yet we have marketplaces like Alibaba, Aliexpress that offer similar services, act as escrow and even have buyer protection and trade assurance.

I doubt if you even need that loan. Perhaps you just came back to troll around and maybe hope you can catch a victim or two, since the amount you mentioned is small?

Seem pretty clear that you can not be trusted even with $1.

Old habits die hard. Can you tell us about this case?

Maybe I wasn't elaborate enough, but my point is it is just a number, there is no major reason for 2 and not 4 or 6 confirmations. Anything more than 1 confirmation is assumed "safe" depending on the person behind the service. I have seen exchanges accept 1 confirmation in order to credit an account, Others require at least 2, 3 or 6 confirmations.

Is there anyone who has ever lost Bitcoins to a double spend attack after 1 confirmation?  Personally, I have never come across such a case.

2 confirmations will definitely affect the time you have to wait for the coins to mixed, depending on how fast the blocks confirm. This is where I said that if someone can wait for 4 hours for the coins to be mixed, the 2 block confirmations (approximately 20 mins on average) should not be a big concern.

Sure, it can be manipulated, but it's easy to notice if one is keen enough. If it's a scammer manipulating feedback, then you are going to see negative feedback from genuine users he tried to scam or scammed.

All security measures are boring, aren't they? 
Writing down seeds, 2 factor verification checks, entering secret codes etc. But if it's for the safety of your funds. Then why not?


This is where your trade partner can counter your claim if he also made a video of the whole process before sending you the banknotes

Personally, I would prefer doing electronic cash transfer to avoid such sorts of headaches.

Another pile of garbage with a flashy technical like name such as BRC-69 to confuse and scam newbies by convincing them that it's the next big thing. Those who know these money grab games won't even spend a single cent of these BRCs.

Something tells me OP might not be familiar with how Zeus wallet works and maybe somewhere, he performed an action he is not aware of. I, too, don't know how it works since it's more into the Lightning network, which I am not well conversant with.

I doubt if he will be able to bump the transaction fee any more than that, otherwise what will he be receiving?  The second transaction contains very small inputs (‎0.00000330 BTC) which total up to small output of ‎0.00002286 BTC

Current transaction fee is 0.00002004 BTC

But Unijoin mixer is not "all services" it's an independent mixer 

If once can wait out for 4 or 6 hours to have their coins mixed, then waiting two block confirmations should be a problem.

---

My interest is in seeing how mixing USDT, a centralized stablecoin which can be frozen in an address, is going to work.

We know where all gender equality bullshit comes from, just like we are now struggling with the alphabet gangs and their so-called rights. A man can never be equal to a woman, and each gender has roles that they are best suited for.

We see all the human rights activists and feminists (who, by the way, are there just to make money) bitching about gender inequality in white-collar jobs, but you will never see them advocating for more women to work in Sewers or other blue collar jobs. Why is it so?

And killing outside politics is ethical?  

Anyway, politics is a dirty game, has always been for centuries and will always be. So long as it involves a selected few getting more money and power over others, there will always be bloodshed. I guess this is just human animal nature. I mean, look at how the bees behave and their queen, Lions, and their prides etc

If you think there will ever be free and fair elections, then think twice. Politics is just a game of crooks and manipulators. Personally, I would wish the business of electing someone to rule over the masses ends forever.

The question is which of the transactions is/was incoming or outgoing

Are you able to recognize any of the addresses involved in the transactions as your personal address?
I am not familiar with Zeus wallet. Does it support lightning network?

I am going to quote myself once again because you haven't responded to this query and instead chose to respond to others.


We would love to know what you would do when such a scenario comes up because believe me, it does come up as the grip of mandatory KYC verification keeps getting tighter with different centralized exchanges.

All centralized exchanges are eventually going to crave into the pressure and implement mandatory KYC verification. So it's a cat and mouse game. Small exchange promises no KYC --> People rush to use it --> it becomes popular --> it starts implementing mandatory KYC verification --> New small no KYC exchange pops up --> cycle continues

I won't suggest to you the best but try looking out for MEXC, Bingx or Bitget ot Phemex.

OP could you please help elaborate which is the copycat site?

In the code, is it a "1" pr and "l" (Letter L). It appears as though it 1. Otherwise, nice catch. It seems so hard to notice for a newbie.

I don't know about the significance to me as a person because I couldn't care less about both (Politics and religion) but one thing I know is politics and religion are like inseparable twins. Religion is a mind control tool that can be used to lure masses into following a certain political leader/ruler or aspirant. Religion can build or destroy a political system. I think you have already seen such examples.

But you just made a public loan request, shouldn't the collateral also be made public for transparency's sake?

If you really have a valid collateral then I am sure you wouldn't have any problem posting about it here unless if it's not there, or it's something very illegal 
Here is my email, send me the proof and I see Godspeed@yopmail.com