 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: « 1 2 3 [4]
|
|
Perhaps you may like Confido, a solution for ecommerce business. Trustless escrow payments with shipment tracking
|
|
|
|
No, IMO bitcoin should be decenteralised.
there should not be governing body
Bitcoin bank doesn't mean centralisation necessarily |
|
|
|
Recently, i often see discussion about Bitcoin Bank. More and more people come here and ask about bitcoin bank & surprisingly i see few user agree with this idea.
So, i would like to find out the percentage of user who agreed with this idea.
Honestly, i think this idea is stupid and worst idea that i've seen in my life. What do you think?
p.s. we don't talk about bitcoin debit card OR any centralized service which only ask name and email address.
It depends on how one does understand the idea of 'bitcoin bank'. In my opinion if bitcoin bank considered as a place where clients can storage their bitcoins safely the answer is definitely NO. Because Bitcoin as itself can storage owner's money safe. If a bank is considered as a provider of such a services like low exchange fees and ability to pay with cryptocurrency like you pay with fiat through you smartphome the answer is YES. |
|
|
|
Tomorrow will be Pally ICO, small hard cap around $4 500 000, famous, team, it will be very quick ico. Check yourself and make good roi  Thank you for your patience  But we still keep it declined  Why sooo many people promote Pally? |
|
|
|
Yes of course, i agree with the idea of Bitcoin bank instead of real one, because in case of a virtual bank, there will be not taxes and impositions while real banks are so greedy about money. Added to that, the price of bitcoin is so impressive wich attracts everyone to come and invest.
Just like what the traditional banks, they will just your deposited bitcoins in their own desires and wants and you will not notice it because the only thing that you know about banks is they are doing good in your money and they are just keeping your money in a safe place but in reality, they are using your bitcoin to their seen opportunities to generate more so you are like lending the bank so it is better to keep it on our own rather than to trust bitcoin bank. That's not really necessary for a bitcoin bank to store your deposited bitcoins to provide you with some banking services. It just needs to have an access to your wallet. |
|
|
|
|
Great project guys. Wish the best of luck with it! Will strongly recommend to participate in your ICO
|
|
|
|
Why do we need "Bitcoin bank" where in fact we already have bank in the forms of web based wallets that are reliable and secure for a long time? Well, not unless if all those wallets will have bad issues that would destroy their reputations to its users would then be the best reason to shift to that "Bitcoin bank" with no ounce of hesitation.
Why don't we need to read at least couple of messages above?  |
|
|
|
the Bitcoin network has a public record called "blockchain". This record contains all transactions ever processed, allowing the user's computer to verify the validity of each transaction. so, even without a bank, every transaction can happen.
That's correct, but bank is not a transactions provider only. Banks are responsible for safety also |
|
|
|
Doesnt seem a good idea if bitcoins have banks. Because that means, bank can manage and monitor bitcoin traffic that occurs between the holders. So, purpose of founder isn't achieved.
Why do you think that the purpose of founder is in anonimity? I see it from decentralisation view more. Since the decentralisation is guaranteed by the nature of blockchain banks unavailable to centralise it again. So the purpose of founder is achieved already. If I control my personal data I can share a part of them to a service which is helpful for me. Why not? |
|
|
|
Bitcoin is sign of liberty and decentralization, obtaining a bank with DB of all the clients, silly concept.
When talking about cryptocurrency the meaning of the word "bank" changes. It's not like with fiat banks. Blockchain and decentralization still works Agree. This is just what I thought first when started to read this thread. |
|
|
|
|
