121
|
Economy / Games and rounds / Re: 1000 BTC GIVEAWAY! From your friend rekcahxfb
|
on: August 04, 2016, 05:30:40 AM
|
1GEnghisk4HXZLgzphNcyRNDm2waA6EvwP
Hello,
I'm not pretty sure what is going on here.
If OP is bfxhacker then would you really like to "WIN" stolen Bitcoins?
So many trusted members has posted their addresses. This is crazy ...
I don't think he is the bfx hacker, someone posted evidence that he could be TF (but we don't know if TF is related to the bfx hack). No matter what or who he is - people want to take a part in a stolen money giveaway. This really sux as long as I see so many known and trusted members posting their addresses. Maybe I may respect his skillz but I don't respect idiots. This isn't right. It's something like: -"Hey I want to give you stolen money!" -"AH! AMAZING! THANK YOU! GIVE IT TO ME"
All of you who has entered this giveaway should receive a -ve trust feedback which should sound like "Took a part in a stolen money giveaway." My opinion.
WTF PEOPLE! So i think you have finally figured how low quality bullshit all that "trust & i believe" talk is ?
|
|
|
122
|
Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitfinex discovered a security breach and halted trading!
|
on: August 03, 2016, 07:17:21 AM
|
what do you expect when it was based in Hong-kong(where there is no difference in white & black money) for obvious reasons ? pretty unprofessional scam i would say. Keep an eye on the 'crypto banks' (a.k.a centralized exchanges regulating crypto's). Polo is on the way bro's. and nothing categorically suggests that its bitfinex loss/holdings..
of course after zane confirms it's their wallet/coins.
|
|
|
123
|
Other / Archival / Re: Paying 20,000 satoshi for upvote in Steemit
|
on: August 02, 2016, 02:51:15 PM
|
how can u buy something like that ? is that even allowed ?
This is allowed.. if they have a blind eye on such activities then whats the context left in "Blogging is the new Mining" ? as we can see people opening facebook/twitter campaigns. just like this now steem is on the trending. No, in those campaigns people advertise their sites & if the user gambles/clicks on an ad/ likes/follows then the reason will be their own will. But in this steemit case you are Literally paying users to upvote no matter they like/dislike the content or even have the bare minimum interest to read the tittle. In that case STEEM is a pretty clear scam.
|
|
|
124
|
Other / Archival / Re: Paying 20,000 satoshi for upvote in Steemit
|
on: August 02, 2016, 02:07:47 PM
|
how can u buy something like that ? is that even allowed ?
What do you mean? It's not illegal nor legal, even yahoo tried this service in this section before. what bullshit ? what connection does the legitimacy of this service has with yahoo or the personality doing it? What is your problem if he is doing this man.He started this service and he is paying from himself not taking anything from you. If you dont like it then just ignore it and go away,do your work. what kind of an idiot r u ? did i told that i dont like what OP is doing ? did i told the OP to not to offer their service ? or added a negative rating on him ? Why putting spoke in anothers wheel ? It's an altcoin i m looking into. Not your graveyard.
|
|
|
125
|
Other / Archival / Re: Paying 20,000 satoshi for upvote in Steemit
|
on: August 02, 2016, 12:43:49 PM
|
how can u buy something like that ? is that even allowed ?
What do you mean? It's not illegal nor legal, even yahoo tried this service in this section before. what bullshit ? what connection does the legitimacy of this service has with yahoo or the personality doing it?
|
|
|
135
|
Other / Meta / Re: I do not endorse any website in my signature.<--Yes You Do!
|
on: August 01, 2016, 07:44:50 PM
|
The only posts that I have seen of yours in this thread is that the extortionist moderator Lauda has the right to advertise what he wants and if the OP disagrees with Lauda advertising for betcoin then the OP can distrust Lauda.
If the moderator is extortionist then the OP can extort him in reply as well. There is no question of betcoin Edit: I would also note that the only people defending betcoin are those who are wearing their signature.
edit again panther. I am not. I must have missed your post when you said that you thought that Betcoin.ag was in the right. You are prolly right but not all participants are defending betcoin as a casino, some of them are also against other people censoring them. Who are you two to force me into anything ? Who are you to bully me and other betcoin.ag signature campaign members with open threats?
--
I am here 5 fucking years, and i can tell you people that centralization of this forum never was worse then it is now. Decentralization forum based on centralized trust rating network, my god. This is exactly what created this atmosphere of company shills that lurk around the forum dealing with DT to top up their trust and to selectively choose in other people's name who's right and who's wrong, and what you should and should not say.
This is school example of extortion, so stop lying to yourself that you're the good guy here, you're not.
|
|
|
138
|
Other / Meta / Re: I do not endorse any website in my signature.<--Yes You Do!
|
on: July 31, 2016, 11:46:52 PM
|
Telling people what I think is or is not acceptable is my right. Trusting or untrusting someone based on their actions is my right. just for yourself not for forum. You are not forum, you are a user. If you don't like what I think or do, then untrust me.
Please tell me why you cannot do that ? why do you want to advertise your opinion ? just untrust the participants . anyways, I clearly knew how things were going to be & i quietly got away/silent . So please continue,its none of my problems.
|
|
|
139
|
Other / Meta / Re: I do not endorse any website in my signature.<--Yes You Do!
|
on: July 31, 2016, 04:45:54 PM
|
Signature campaigns give sites credibility. So does advertising on this forum through paid ads. The fact that Theymos denied Betcoin.ag from advertising on this forum is totally relevant information that should be considered when making your own opinion on the situation. But in the end, we each have our own opinion of the situation and have the right to leave whatever trust we see fit.
Just a small point. Theymos did not accept ads from bitmixer. But Bitmixer's signature campaign is alive and kicking. The forum did carry ads of Bitcoin Black Friday, which turned out to be a scam. So we shouldn't be linking everything to the forum's ad policy. Exactly. What theymos does is his call, not mine & not anybody Else's. Someone is a fan of him ? sure follow him but don't censor others to do it too.
Fortune jack openly lied about their video contest & didn't payed the 50+ btc bonuses but nobody has problems with them. Their campaign runs smoothly too. 'Extorting participants & saying what is acceptable and what is not' is not your right.What duties do you fulfill so you get the rights to say me what is wrong or what is acceptable ? do u pay my taxes ? do u pay my rent ? do u pay forum bills ? do u pay forum taxes ? do you come and speak in the court for me ? updating that fucking signature thread are your Duties ? are you even fucking serious ?
|
|
|
|