Depends on if the story is picked up and run with by major news companies ala BBC.

You're wrong on more than one point. But I understand you're probably just trying to talk the price down, so cheers!

Well, the Subways news are HUGE! This is the BIGGEST fast food company in the world (based on the number of restaurants world wide)!

Baidu news was nothing compared to this!

My view on the current market: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=__VQX2Xn7tI

The Chinese are such insatiable beasts I LOVE THOSE GUYS!
They did $82e6 in a single day at the peak, now they are doing almost $52e6.

Every country that tries to break from the petro dollar immediately becomes the enemy of the US....then they get a healthy dose of "democracy freedom".

Does this not tell us that WE are the exchanges.

Boom America is not a leader!

Yeah, she's old yet she seems to 'grok' Bitcoin. I'm hopeful for the future. People seem very open-minded.

There is too much risk associated in trading right now that Bitcoin price is so high, one bad trade and you can lost thousands of dollars, that hurts a lot.

This is not the same as when Bitcoin was worth 10 dollars, so people trend to trade less and less, at least common people.

I personally don't give a shit about volatility, dips or corrections, and unless the uptrend is clearly broken i will not sell one single satoshi.

I think most people feels the same.

Bitcoins should not be assessed according to where they have been. That would ruin their fungibility and require coin blacklists that would create a central authority.

This post on Reddit explains how in 1749, a court sided with the Royal Bank of Scotland in its legal challenge to a request for such a blacklist. The court ruled that making money responsible for the acts of its previous holders would "render the Notes absolutely useless":

http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1le87j/bitcoin_core_dev_on_stolen_coins_and_transaction/cbycmhk

Bitcoins should not be assessed according to where they have been. That would ruin their fungibility and require coin blacklists that would create a central authority.

This post on Reddit explains how in 1749, a court sided with the Royal Bank of Scotland in its legal challenge to a request for such a blacklist. The court ruled that making money responsible for the acts of its previous holders would "render the Notes absolutely useless":

http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1le87j/bitcoin_core_dev_on_stolen_coins_and_transaction/cbycmhk

For fucks sake  
How in the world is this even remotely being considered? This is a terrible idea.