Latest posts of: korm

Quote from: nikolasgr on March 02, 2018, 02:39:33 PM

Probably there is a mistake here since I have been a member of the IntenseCoin Channel in Slack. Probably the fact that username in slack can be changed at any time is the tricky point there

I have a similar situation. In a slack chat I have one name that I have not changed since registration. And in the table for the organizers for some reason instead of it is the name of the email on which I registered. ie letters before the @

Quote from: nikolasgr on March 02, 2018, 07:15:13 PM

Please check the relevant sheet of the excel (with the usernames) if your username is there. If it is not, please check if there is in there the ID of your email. For example if your email was ABCD@gmail.com please check if there is any ABCD in the list with the usernames. So we can understand if we face exactly the same problem.

Yes. This is the problem. The name in the chat and the name in the mail do not match

Quote from: xs.over on February 19, 2018, 07:07:10 PM

Yeah, one more cpu mining altcoin are almost f**ked up by botnets/cloud miners with trial accs and other things. Seems, with current "price" on aro coin once network hashrate will hit ~200Kh/s it will be not profitable for cloudminers who really pay for rented hardware, and will stay only botnets and free accs. Bullshit

Still no exchange.
Well, profitability of mining Arionum coin are almost destroyed by a few large whales and some omount of small cloud miners with trial accs and it happened even faster than this coin hit any exchange.
BS

you are reading my mind...
I've really can not understand people using 1070 and 1080 on this.
The only difference is the programming language. What's the point with a 65% -80% pre-mine. there is no point. And this is exactly what a couple of wallets do on the main pool.

Quote from: valiant1 on February 16, 2018, 03:36:02 AM

Xmas airdrop campaign finished! We ended with 1,227 applications (2.5mil ITNS distribution). View the final list of wallets here: https://intensecoin.com/airdrop-submissions/

Payments will be sent Feb 21 to Feb 28 as described in the original post.

Thanks for your interest!

Thanks

The statistics are really not comfortable on the pool.
It would be nice if you do not have to enter the key number every time. Some kind of personal cabinet or something like that

Well. Let's see how long Google will be stupid. Sooner or later they will find trial users

write in support. 100% is prohibited by contract

in fact it's shit. It's like a premine of 65%
I doubt Very much, that they fairly use such power

Quote from: Trutest on February 13, 2018, 12:37:37 PM

Quote from: korm on February 13, 2018, 11:58:44 AM

public key

I tried the public key and the miner wouldnt start. I changed it back to my receive funds key for now

I dont see any balance in my wallet but I jist started. I'll check again tomorrow. Only doing 4.8 h/s average. If I go to aropool and put in my receive address I see a few very small amounts pending. I'll wait until this reaches 10 I guess

sorry. Your Address is: ***** -this one

Quote from: crobin on February 12, 2018, 09:35:59 AM

After the hardfork from 5th feb. is gpu mining still possible or not?
I only want to mine via cpu, I have a lot of cpu resources but no gpu's and if some guys are using gpus it would be senseless for me to continue...

some guys are using cloud mining...

Three people get 65 percent of the pool. Cool. Decentralized Revolution Grin

"decentralized" cloud mining Cheesy

A strange thing. With an Intel processor i5-7500 I get only 7 H/s (Dan AVX2 miner). Although here write more than 30 should be (or20H/s for G4400). In the beginning of topic was some kind of wrong software or how it happens? In the http://aropool.com/benchmarks is also 6-7 H/s. Where does it come in dozens?

So, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2710248.msg29620618#msg29620618

Quote from: programmerdan on February 08, 2018, 06:19:53 PM

New release of Java Miner w/ prebuilds for Windows:

https://github.com/ProgrammerDan/arionum-java/releases/tag/0.2.3

I strongly recommend updating. Testing users saw 25-50% increase in hashing speeds. In some rare cases, 100% increase. This will vary from system configuration to configuration. Tested ~24 hours on my test systems (i7 7700k, Atom 2.4Ghz) with many successful share submissions.

Current benchmark changes:

Linux Mint 18.3, i7-7700k: 11.25h/s ---> 14.25h/s

Windows 10 Pro, i7 6600U: ~2.5H/s --> 6H/s

1. Thanks
2. 2All -> Dan give you all very good miner. Give him +Merit
3. vs Dan miner I have 2.1Hs (+100%) on my intel N3450

toDan
N3450 work fine vs XMRig (support AES-NI), but work only vs arionum-miner-java.exe
(AVX, AVX2 dont work)
Is it possible to use AES?

Quote from: sundownz on February 10, 2018, 01:02:29 PM

Does anyone know if there is a hard limit on number of workers on HashVault.Pro ?

It seems whenever I put more than 66 workers online some of them lose connection and remain no more than 66.

ask the administrator. From the bottom left there is a chat.

Quote

AMD A10 but the hash rate is 40-50 H/s

old AMD does not make sense. It is better to put one radeon card R7 240 and get 100Hs/35W

what pool gives such a high Network Hash Rate?

0.4% on the dero.cryptopool.space (+PPLNS)

Quote from: ccminer.net on January 31, 2018, 03:01:55 PM

is it possibile to mine it with GPU and claymore miner?

yes/ claymore 11.x

Quote from: lncm on January 25, 2018, 10:15:47 AM

With only 2 pools, too easy to have more than 51% hashrate on one of them, no? That's not secure using blockchain.

I know it. But we are now trying to earn coins. I tried on another coin pool with a small rating. Too bad a general result is obtained. luck, total efort is far from 100 percent.