|
462
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [UNO] Unobtanium Info & Discussion - Update to 0.10 Wallet - Merge Mine w/BTC!
|
on: February 06, 2016, 03:03:24 PM
|
Why is less inflation an advantage?
Cause the sell pressure is not high. We have an ultra low inflation rate but still more than 800 TH/s and a good working network. That's good! It would be easy to rise the exchange rate to 0.01, you only need a few BTC. If many buy, it might come up to 0.1 soon. But there is no need to rise it too soon. We like the low prices.  That is one characteristic of a low inflation schedule, but another is that it is now impossible to mine any material quantity - perhaps one reason we have such concentrated holdings. I am not wholly convinced that the very front loaded distribution (and extremely long tail) is an advantage, but I haven't given it a great deal of thought. I'm not sure what the network cost of UNO is now - but I would imagine the cost per UNO transaction is now astronomical - huge difficulty, few transactions.
In the last 100 blocks - 5 blocks had 2 transactions and one had 3, the rest only had the single coinbase transaction. So 100 blocks of mining for 7 "real" transactions ...
You are right, but don't forget we can do the merged mining together with bitcoin, so mining is not too expensive! - it seems highly unlikely that a move away from Bitcoin will be to UNO. Same as Bitcoin then? Except you have to buy Bitcoin first to do it.
I think Uno will rise, when Bitcoin gets forked. Forking means inflation + loss of trust.- Bitcoin Core- Bitcoin Classic- Bitcoin UnlimitedThis will lead to irritations. Which Bitcoin is the right Bitcoin? The people will panic and search for a life boat. There it is: non-inflatable Uno So it's similar, but not the same. Unobtanium is more stable and has more potential to rise! Not relevant to my point that to use UNO, you have to first buy BTC. As for the Bitcoin discussions around blocksize, lightning networks, sidechains, segregated witness, etc. yes I agree they are confusing for many, but: a) I suspect most people expect they will be resolved in a way that affects them very little if at all (and I suspect they are right); and b) if there really were a move away from Bitcoin I can't see why it would be to UNO - apart from being SHA-256 it is not exactly very similar. As I have said before I think it far more likely that LTC would step up - decent market cap, decent liquidity, strong network, etc.. Well at least there is no need to change UNO block size since the amount of tx is small at this time. I still have a lot of study to do on the MM equation. Also the peer discovery code is beyond mangled, UNO being in a better position than Pr however as there are more broadcasting nodes. While Electrum wallets are fine for certain use cases, using any SPV wallet raises question as to how much you trust your bloom filters. I prefer a full node that verifies all transactions. |
|
|
|
|
463
|
Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: CRYPTSY stopping withdraw locking accounts without notifying users! Class Action
|
on: February 06, 2016, 01:50:46 AM
|
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10152619382886025&set=a.441395256024.210964.589811024&type=3&theater Traded the bitch in for a newer model. BTW, kickin' his two kids to the curb during the process, ergo anybody who thinks they're ever gonna see their moneys once on Cryptsy again best go see a doctor, for you've got serious issues. No person who doesn't give a fuck about his kids is gonna have compassion for you or your money. It was "FUCK YOU, I'M GETTIN' MINE!" since May 20, 2013, with John Hammes aka BitJohn cheerleading a month prior to Cryptsy goin' live, with John's brother-in-law, John "cup my" Ballenger, working with Mullick building and maintaining the exchange.  New girlfriend, same punchable face ..... that's the Big Vern we know and detest, |
|
|
|
|
467
|
Other / Politics & Society / Re: Cointelpro Techniques for dilution, misdirection and control of a internet forum
|
on: February 04, 2016, 02:49:31 PM
|
Forum-slide countering Bump. Its very obvious that this happens everywhere in Bitcoin. We just haven't figured out the source. Subversion within the community is also common. I wish people knew more about it. Upvoting and downvoting habits are very easily gamed and observed every single day on /r/btc and /r/bitcoin on reddit.
Open your eyes people. Keep bumping this post.
Mod: pls sticky.
This is why when we spoke of reddit I was unsure if it was a viable market because of this precise reason. |
|
|
|
|
468
|
Other / Meta / Re: Legendary one day?
|
on: February 04, 2016, 12:48:27 PM
|
For me this is about 2 years of activity from now?!
84+365*2 = 814, so it might take even longer. Why there is no way of becoming honorable member if your posts are very quality and if you helping others?
A high rank does not make you honorable, but it gives you a fancy 5. coin. Just got around to checking this thread, congrats shorena on your Legendary status and fancy 5 coins. Well deserved. |
|
|
|
|
472
|
Economy / Services / Re: YoBit.Net - Signature Campaign - Realtime Payouts (daily)
|
on: February 03, 2016, 09:01:59 PM
|
Does this signature accept posts from every board or are there certain board that's considered as not-counted? I can't find the rule about it anywhere
Doesn't matter for you at this point - you have a newbie account and this campaign no longer accepts newbies. |
|
|
|
|
473
|
Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Vanitygen: Vanity bitcoin address generator/miner [v0.22]
|
on: February 03, 2016, 09:00:43 PM
|
I'd like to see this done in such a way that one could have their address generated elsewhere, peerhpas even paying for it as a service, without the third party gaining access to the private key. There was some discussion about it, and it's certainly possible, but it seems to require code changes which are beyond my level of C...
Shorena already offers this as a service, it is called split-key vanity generation. The steps are outlined in the OP. |
|
|
|
|
480
|
Other / Meta / Re: Stake your Bitcoin address here
|
on: February 03, 2016, 01:05:09 AM
|
Please quote my signed message: -----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE----- I am (No subject), today is 03-02-2016, I am staking my address on bitcointalk.org. -----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNATURE----- Version: MultiBit HD (0.1.4) Comment: https://multibit.orgAddress: 1KrPi5UiXSu6MLsFVLq7mAR3VmuJH678xL H4PBs4Oa7vEblTdaeDOGTxJNZpcZk5q+UnSZmN37Yf4XYtbncoxSQn24NErRHCFQewsUdzwSjhwWG/odIdM82pg= -----END BITCOIN SIGNATURE----- Quoted and verified. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
