|
Good project! Having an MVP + a great team definitely works in favor of the project, however, even if the company tokens are locked for 3 years, 33% is still a big percentage. There is a chance that the market will be controlled by the company.
|
|
|
|
|
Looks like a great team working on the project. Hopefully there will be a more detailed roadmap.
|
|
|
|
|
Looks like this is going to be big. Hopefully we get official information soon, and a website!
|
|
|
|
|
Nice and well-balanced team. However, since your project is about KYC, do you have someone onboard who has expertise in law/regulations?
|
|
|
|
|
Cool project. It would be nice to see the project partner with blockchain game devs.
|
|
|
|
|
The project looks good. It's unfortunate that there are people who got scammed by others pretending to be from the project. It's always good to conduct due diligence, and double check links for scam or phishing.
|
|
|
|
was the ICO successful?
From a financial perspective? YES. They reached their hard cap.
From an investors perspective? NO. They kept changing their rules, and some investors missed out because they weren't given the facts from the admin team.
From a public perspecive? NO. The rule changes, the other issues leading up to the ICO, only give fuel to the fudders. Why give Fudders fuel?
Sure, call me sour because I missed out on the ICO. Why did I miss out? because I believed and listened to the rules which were laid out by the Admin team.
With this one, missing out the on the ICO is fine with me. More time will pass before they are on an exchange, which means more time to determine if they are actually a scam or not. Right now it's REALLY hard to tell.
They got pretty good reviews online. Not sure if those were done prior to the rule changes you mentioned, though. |
|
|
|
Great team, project has good potential, and tokens have actual uses, and not just for trading as a coin. I hope issues get resolved soon!
Can you explain about that ongoing issues I'm unable to find out these. Potentially it looking safe for long term investors this project has good team behind this and with use case in real life will be good decision. I meant the ones being mentioned here on the thread by other users. ^_^ |
|
|
|
|
Is the project only for the history of used vehicles?
|
|
|
|
This ico is an SCAM, I work a credit manger at Big Bank, in Spain... it has branches in UK, States, Poland... Germany... the logo is red. It is impossible a system to lend using crypto, and the owners of project are located in Russia... please it is an scam... How to deal with small company that not pay the debt?  Please the majority Scammers are from lithuania.... Thanks. How is this a scam? There is an MVP (minimum viable product), the team is visible and looks like they are well-experienced in finance management and the law, the white paper is well-detailed, and roadmap is for 4 years. There are a lot of projects that doesn't really do anything, but get a lot of investors. LOL |
|
|
|
|
Graft doesn't seem to be a very good name, but looks like it's performing well. I didn't see a roadmap in the whitepaper, however. Can anyone link me to it?
|
|
|
|
|
I've read that this project already has downloadable mobile apps. Not sure how it's going to really fare considering the multitude of messaging apps that are already out there, though. I'm also wondering why it needs blockchain to succeed as a project.
|
|
|
|
|
Wow! This is a pretty long thread. The team seems to really know what they're doing. How are you planning to compete with other projects in the same space?
|
|
|
|
|
Hello everyone. Just wanted to know if the GRAIN token will have other functions aside from what it's currently for, which is not really unique to the project. Upon checking the whitepaper, it seems that tokens were created primarily for funding the project since its other functions is just similar to what other coins do.
|
|
|
|
|
Hey guys. I just wanted to know how and why you came up with this project, seeing that based on your backgrounds, you don't have anything related to your project, and none of you are into blockchain or at least software development.
|
|
|
|
|
Looks like a good project. However, tokens allocated to the team and company seems to be too high.
30% is for the RightMesh team
20% is for Left (parent company)
10% for advisors and “TGE costs”
Investors might shy away from the fact that market value is controlled by the company.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi devs! How do you plan to make this a success considering the number of similar projects out there?
|
|
|
|
|
Pretty low ratings on ICOrating.com and Cryptorated.com
How do you guys plan to address concerns such as the ff:?
1. Tokens are used as a passive investment vehicle only. Investment and profit distribution strategies are fully determined by the company (centralized). No smart contract code or specifications are provided.
2. Roadmap lacks detail
|
|
|
|
|
Great team, project has good potential, and tokens have actual uses, and not just for trading as a coin. I hope issues get resolved soon!
|
|
|
|
I think you guys are supposed to send a private message to the thread starter for the airdrop, and not comment your addresses here. Anyway, I created a Facebook page for Cryptocurrency Games. Please follow us here to get daily updates on the latest news on blockchain games: https://www.facebook.com/cryptogamescommunity/You can also join our Telegram channel here: https://t.me/cryptogamegroup |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
