I totally agree with you about this one. And it is very annoying when you provide all your details to a project that ends up giving you nothing in return. KYC of these days require a lot of detailed information from you too. It makes the whole thing complicated.
|
|
|
Borrowing would have been a good thing in the crypto community, but the question is, who will borrow the tokens out? And if he does it, how is he going to track those who have borrowed and dont want to pay back. Some people will just borrow huge sums, and exit.
|
|
|
My favourite bounty will be the one that will pay me for the work that i have done, and i end up making a reasonable some of money from it. Apart from that, i dont consider any of the bounties i have done this year as my favourite. Some have paid alright, but it is not worth anything.
|
|
|
I dont yet have a favourite bounty this year. Most of the bounties i have participated in have ended up being postponed and some have turned out to be scam projects. The most annoying ones are those that have ended successfully, but are refusing to distribute tokens due to some reasons.
|
|
|
i thought i was the only one having those coins in my wallet. So many of them, but from the look of this, they are actually worthless. Because of the freedom associated with the waves platform, anyone can create his/her own coins with the least amount of waves.
|
|
|
It is good to share what you think its beneficial with others. But i have one problem with regards to the topic and the content of your post. Blog writing is also part of bounty hunting, and it has been the case all this while. So i totally disagree if you say, without investing. Doing bounties means investing your time into the whole thing.
|
|
|
Have not heard about any upgrade coming soon. Well, if there is one coming, $200 should be a very reference point with regards to how the price will go high. As it stands now, the price is not too far below the one you have stated, and the market regards just a good news to shoot.
|
|
|
To me, i think they started dying about a year ago and they are almost dead completely. Most people have lost trust in ICOs, you know why, non of the previous ICOs have been able to come out with a strong product.
|
|
|
You may have a point with regards to the environmental pollution aspect, no doubt. But lets look at it from this angle, environmental pollution started way before bitcoin even came into existence. Apart from that, how many people mind bitcoin in a particular locality, compared to the number of industries and factories that are around there? The amount of pollution caused by other factors are way more than what bitcoin mining can cause.
|
|
|
Sometimes the hatred for something makes you turn a deaf ear to the good aspect of the whole thing. It looks like people are just refusing to embrace technology that will make life more easier for them. instead, they feel okay to stay with what they have at the moment. Some old lawmakers just refusing to advance in terms of technology and decide to conclude that anything about bitcoin is a scam.
|
|
|
Looking at the rat at which people join twitter bounty campaigns, it is obvious that it wont be long until twitter campaigns become irrelevant like airdrops. There are too make people applying for twitter campaigns, and am sure most of they use multiple accounts looking at the ease with which one can easily create one.
|
|
|
Most of the ICOs of these days are actually failing. Most investors dont want to buy at the ico stage because they are afraid people will run away with their money, looking at the way this kind of things are happening. So they prefer to wait and buy it cheaply from bounty hunters when it is listed.
|
|
|
Bounty managers are sometimes not to blame depending on somethings. If the manager makes it clear from the beginning that he is not part of the team and that if you are joining, you are doing so at your own individual risk, then why blame him for any unforseen circumstance? There are managers from the team itself, for those ones, you can blame.
|
|
|
Altcoins are needed to make the community popular. They are needed to provide the competition we need for the growth of a stronger community. It is quite obvious that wherever there is competition, they is competitive growth. And this is what we need as a community to progress.
|
|
|
I dont like to call it dangerous, so i will prefer calling it risky. Of course anything that is capable of giving you something significant should entail some risk. Also, most people or countries are not banning icos because it is risky, they are doing that because they cant regulate it.
|
|
|
I think there are actually some decent airdrops out there, but the fact still remains the same, most and majority of them are just as useless as you can think. They will give you the tokens alright, but the tokens will never get listed on any exchange for you to make anything meaningful out of it.
|
|
|
Reaching a hardcap just informs you that the tokens are been bought and that people are buying into the idea of the project. When the hardcap is reached, it puts hope in the investors too. But i have seen many projects fall rapidly after reaching hardcap because they failed to deliver on their projects. If you promised something, you have to fulfil it.
|
|
|
Buying when the token has been listed on the market is far better doing buying during ICO. the thing is that when you buy during an ICO and the project is a scam project, the devs will definitely run away with your money. But when you buy from the market, you are always sure that you can go back and sell them when the need arises.
|
|
|
|