Bitcoin Forum
May 11, 2024, 10:17:54 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 »
41  Economy / Goods / [WTS/WTB] Portal 2, split a two-pack from the Steam daily sale on: July 09, 2011, 05:46:46 PM
The Steam sale is going on right now and Portal 2 is half-off!  http://store.steampowered.com/app/620/

A copy of Portal 2 costs $25.  But -- there is a 2-pack available for $45, which makes it $22.50 per copy.  Granted, not an amazing savings over just getting one copy, but I can't say not to an opportunity to use Bitcoin and help another Bitcoiner save a little bit of money.  Plus, it could be substantially cheaper for someone who lives in another country.

So here's the deal -- I will either buy or sell a copy of Portal 2 at the median of the ask/bid exchange rate on MtGox * $22.50.  Right now it's trading for 14.4 BTC/USD, so that'd be 1.5625 BTC.  If you would prefer to spend Bitcoins, I'll buy the game on my credit card, you send me 1.5625 BTC, and I'll send you a copy of the game.  If you would prefer to receive Bitcoins, you buy the same through Steam, send the second copy to my Steam account, and I'll send you the Bitcoins.  Whoever has the lower rep sends the goods first.

Note that this sale only runs for the next 23 hours, so if you want it, let me know immediately!
42  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin version 0.3.24 released on: July 08, 2011, 09:42:25 PM
Is there a certain procedure for updating a wallet without loosing the BTC in it?

Make a backup before installing a new version just in case it doesn't work.
43  Economy / Goods / Re: WTS 7 5830's on: July 08, 2011, 02:27:10 PM
With this difficulty level and this exchange rate it is a buyer's market.  You're not going to be able to sell used equipment at above new cost.  If you really want it to sell, accept $100 per card.
44  Economy / Goods / Re: WTS Bitcoin Quad 6870 Mining Rig - New Price! on: July 08, 2011, 02:25:15 PM
Rig at stock clockspeed does 1100-1200 M/hash on deepbit

Um, the screenshot you're showing has the rig outputting less than 1000 MHash/s total.  Yes, every so often it will get lucky and temporarily display a speed of 1100-1200 MHash/s on Deepbit.  By the same token, every so often it will be unlucky, and will display a speed of 700-900 on Deepbit.  You need to take the all-time average, not just the highs.

PSU:
Cooler Master Silent Pro M100 1000W PSU

CPU:
Quadcore AMD Phenom II X4 955  Black Edition 3.2 Ghz

Memory:
Patriot Memory 'Sector 5' G Series 4GB

Case:
COOLER MASTER HAF 932 Advanced RC-932-KKN5-GP Black Steel ATX Full Tower

HD:
IMATION SATA2 64GB SSD (pretty nice)

Well there's your problem.  All of these parts are unnecessary for a dedicated mining rig.  You definitely didn't need that CPU, or that much memory, or a case, or the SSD, and you could've gone with a smaller PSU to boot (around 800-850W).

A few weeks ago I put together a rig, NEW, for $950, composed of 4x5830s, that outputs 1240 MHash/s (that's average, not peak).  So to charge more than that for a used rig that outputs fewer MHash/s, well ... I don't think you're going to find many potential buyers.
45  Other / CPU/GPU Bitcoin mining hardware / Re: freakin newegg...just when I thought I got them! on: July 08, 2011, 01:21:45 AM
Two 6970s should have a higher hashing rate than one 6990.  I wouldn't necessarily return them.
46  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Who is mining namecoins and why? on: July 07, 2011, 04:38:52 PM
I noticed a pretty serious uptick in namecoin mining, enough to jump the expected difficulty drop date from august to mid july. What is causing the sudden interest in namecoin mining all of a sudden? Still seems like a losing proposition at the current price / difficulty, or are people just eager to get the difficulty down so they can get it up again? hah.

People who are mining Namecoin at the moment are doing it because they believe in Namecoin.  They like the idea and they want it to succeed.  It's no different than people who are putting time and effort into Bitcoin because they like the idea and they want it to succeed.  And Namecoin won't succeed if the hashing power is so low that anyone can trivially take over the network, or if new blocks are being found very infrequently because the difficulty rocketed up when it was more lucrative than Bitcoin mining, but then everyone left when it wasn't.
47  Other / CPU/GPU Bitcoin mining hardware / Re: Best 4xPCIe 2.0 Motherboard for Mining? on: July 07, 2011, 04:28:02 PM
Can you link to some specific boards in that price range that are known to work with 4x cards using x1 risers?  It seems kind of hit and miss to just pick one at random, because some of them really can't do it.
48  Other / CPU/GPU Bitcoin mining hardware / Re: 5830's, what mh/s are you getting? on: July 07, 2011, 04:11:45 PM
4x5830, each at 975/335, using latest Phoenix and phatk kernel, getting about 311 MHash/s per card.  I tried pushing up to 985/335, but something crashed overnight and I lost some hours of mining (and had to reboot in the morning).  The system has been running stable at 975/335 for days though, so that seems achievable with my setup.  Temps on the hottest card are around 66-68 degC (yay open case with a box fan).
49  Other / Archival / Re: Pictures of your mining rigs! on: July 07, 2011, 03:00:57 AM
So I've clicked through all 30 pages and I DIDN'T SEE ONE SUBMERGED SETUP.  I am dissapoint.

I'm simply not necessary.  I'm running my cards just about as fast as they can possibly go.  My secret?  No case + box fan.  Which is much, much easier than a submerged setup, I assure you.
50  Other / CPU/GPU Bitcoin mining hardware / Re: 5870s in stock at Newegg 189.99 on: July 06, 2011, 08:28:21 PM
I'm getting around 440MH/s out of mine.  I can't remember where I saw it, but there was a chart comparing MH/s, cost, and power consumption and the 5870 is THE card to get for MH/s vs. Power used.
If you add up the costs for a server (bare minimum)
cpu-                                        $30
ram-                                       $10
psu-                                      $150
mobo-                                  $140 (if you know cheeper then this with 4 pci express then let me know)
hd-                                         $15
PCIe x16 Extender Cable       $12*4
5870   $190x4
=      $1,153
(440x4)/1153=1.53 megahash per dollar(full server cost)

with 5830
5830   $110x4
=        $833
(330x4)/833=1.58

So as long as you go the absolute cheapest route 5830 rig at 110 is better but not much so. If you add a case or more to the cost at all the 5870 at 190 will probably overcome the 5830.

The last price the 5830s was available at was $130, not $110.  Using that figure the ratio comes out to 1.445 for the 5830 rig, so the 5870 rig is actually more economical.

Not that I would dream of buying new rigs right now!
51  Other / CPU/GPU Bitcoin mining hardware / Re: SmartCoin - A simple, robust mining system for Linux. [BETA RELEASED!] on: July 06, 2011, 06:55:49 PM
hmmm..

have run  it and it said newest verstion installed..then tried again..but same error Sad

linuxcoin newest version with persistence

You want to install the "locate" package.  Worked for me in Linuxcoin.
52  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: "I need BTC to X" on: July 06, 2011, 05:28:29 PM
X = Anything I am presently forced to use PayPal for.
53  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Potential attack vector in generating Bitcoin addresses? on: July 06, 2011, 12:43:03 AM
If you collide an address, you don't have to do it with the same ECDSA key that the owner used.  This is basically a birthday attack on a 160 bit hash.  160 bits is probably enough.  I recall that early digital money schemes had users picking random 64 bit integers and assumed no collisions.  Loom is 64 bits too, as I recall.


The birthday problem isn't relevant though.  Say you generated 2^80 addresses and managed to collide two, well, odds are better than 2^50 to 1 that the collision you just found is with another address that you created ... that has no money on it.  So it's not a birthday problem; you need to collide with one of the vanishingly small number of addresses (out of the entire keyspace) that actually has an appreciable amount of money stored in it.
54  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: Capital cost. on: July 05, 2011, 11:46:11 PM
I've spent $1660 on ~2370 MHash/s, or about 70 cents per MHash/s.  Not too shabby, especially in comparison to some of the other numbers on here!  It helps that $310 of the $1660 was to purchase two 5850s that went into otherwise already-bought-and-paid-for computers.  I only have a rig and a half that was purchased specifically for mining.
55  Other / Off-topic / Re: Domain names targeted more by U.S. and U.K. governments. Namecoin to step in? on: July 05, 2011, 03:43:17 PM
I'm not sure about namecoin and can't imagine how it works. How does it work? It's not like you can have a fraction of a domain name, are there a limited number of domains? What happens if someone loses their wallet? Do names expire?

Where can I read more about this?

More info here: http://tinyurl.com/3bnlzbq
56  Other / CPU/GPU Bitcoin mining hardware / Re: Newegg 5830 on: July 05, 2011, 04:37:03 AM
At this difficulty level with this exchange rate a 5830 will never pay for itself.  Hence why I'm not buying any, and probably also why not a lot of other people are either, and thus why they're still in stock.
57  Other / Archival / Re: Pictures of your mining rigs! on: July 05, 2011, 03:42:20 AM
Here's my 4x5830 rig.  Two cards are running directly on the mobo, two are running on PCIe adapter cables in the second tier.  Yes, the skeletal chassis as such is an old table that was taken apart and put back together.  I've since moved this setup from my dining room table to a small desk in the basement and it has a box fan on one side blowing through the videocards (the temps are quite low).  Each card is putting out 310 MHash/s for 1240 MHash/s total.  Oh, and the OS is Linuxcoin running on a USB flash drive.

58  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: Anyone know why the network hashing rate has gone down today? on: July 03, 2011, 06:57:37 PM
I'd also guess CPU mining now loses you money so that probably dropped a few people out too.
even with the returns down 40%, it is still very much profitable. Hmm... 300%+ annual ROI via bitcoin mining vs 3% from money sitting in a bank account... Hell, in the 'real' world people jump for joy if they get anything above 10%! Would you call it a good investment if it took you 10 years to pay off your rig? But of course, we are just getting started, as profitable it may look today, it may not be so tomorrow.
[/quote]

The two situations aren't comparable though.  Money in a bank account just sits there and collects interest.  Money put into a Bitcoin mining rig requires constant fussing with; you need to upgrade software as newer versions come along, keep the rig up and running through power failures, mining pool failures, potential hardware failures, and pay continual electricity bills.

Mining rigs have to pay themselves off in a manner of months.  The exponentially increasing difficulty level means that any rig will output most of its lifetime Bitcoins (>90%) within the first few months.  After that it's just peanuts.  So talking about it on a scale of ten years is meaningless.  Besides, there isn't a mining rig that exists today that will be worth running anything close to ten years from now.  New hardware will come along that is more efficient in terms of electricity used and will make anything we're running today not even profitable to run for mining within a few years.
59  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: Linux vs Windows for Dedicated Mining on: July 03, 2011, 04:49:41 PM
For a dedicated mining rig, Linux is a no-brainer.  Linux is free (in speech but more applicably here also as in beer), whereas Windows is going to run you $100-200.  There are lots of arguments over which is faster, but I can pretty much guarantee you that even if Windows is somehow faster, it's not $100-200 faster.
60  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: LinuxCoin A lightweight Debian based OS with everything ready to go. on: July 02, 2011, 08:25:31 PM
I just got Linuxcoin 0.2.1b up and running and it worked very well out of the box.  I must tip my hat to you on a great release.  I only had to make some minor changes (run aticonfig --adapter=all --initial -f again, change permissions/ownership on /opt/miners/phoenix/ , do svn update from within /opt/miners/phoenix/ to get the latest version with the +3% speed boost Ma() function, copy over the /etc/OpenCL directory from another computer because for whatever reason the AMD EULA popup never appeared and thus those files never got written, and then there's the unfortunate issue with /var/run/screen having the wrong permissions set with every boot).

But anyway, all of those tweaks took no more than 30 minutes, which is an excellent price to pay for getting access to Catalyst 11.6!  I have my four 5830s running at 960,335 MHz clock speeds now (up from a limit of 900 on Linuxcoin 0.2a with Catalyst 11.5).  Each one is pushing around 304-305 MHash/s for a total rig output of 1220 MHash/s.  That is way more than I ever thought these 5830s were going to be able to output, and they're all running at below 70degC to boot!

And you did a good job listening to all of the suggestions in here.  I don't see a one that didn't make it in.  Hell, you even included the firmware-atheros package, so 0.2.1b worked out of the box with my wireless card without even having to copy that driver over on a USB stick.  Very nice  Grin  I just sent you a donation.  You earned it!
Pages: « 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!