It is crazy to want to sell with good news!

Cashback increased, and it is more important than other cards.

By the way, I have never counted on the asset contract. And counts still add up.

Real life teaches that there is nothing to win from such a legal action.

The truth is that some people are scared, but some really want to destroy MCO.

I however agree that Chris will need to reassure MCO holders.

It is clear that MCO will be less appealing without asset contract. However, it is still attractive.

As I said before, it is still more appealing than other cards.

I do not appreciate the news of the cancellation of the asset contract.

But, MCO  is still more valuable than other card projects.

This is good to see that the HMQ team is waking up. I believe that they have a great project.

However, I think it is not appropriately marketed.

The fact that HMQ allows the users not using the public key is the most powerful tool. HMQ IS A PRIVATE BANK. It should be underlined!

HMQ is an excellent solution for unbanked AND THE BANKED. It should be well communicated! Otherwise, for the unbanked, the project will be superseded by bitcoin (and by other projects); and with regard to the “banked”, they could not be in any manner attracted to the project. This is a big mistake not to attract the “banked”, and just to target the unbanked. Omisego understood it, this is why it is successful.

Thus, to sum up: HMQ is a great asset if HMQ team conveys the essential message that WITH HMQ THERE’S NO NEED TO THINK ABOUT KEYS, AND HMQ IS A PRIVATE BANK AT HOME!

For your knowledge: below are the interesting details of the white paper:

Our solution: we discarded the private and public key approach, which confuses newcomers; we also had to reject using fractional amounts of coins, since decimal fractions may be uneasy for people with little or no education. It’s very simple. Coins are whole numbers (integers), faces are used as passwords