481
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [PHR] PHORE BLOCKCHAIN - Private Decentralized Marketplace & Ecosystem. POS/MN.
|
on: April 16, 2018, 11:09:22 PM
|
2 Phore
May I ask a question. I was applied for campaign, wear a signature and so on. But I didn't spam here. Only made posts that I wanted to write. I agree that if I didn't make 25 posts per week then I shouldn't receive anything.
But there was no rules that if participant didn't make enough posts he will be excluded from list.
And you excluded me. I'm really disappointed (((
Lol, what's going wrong with you. However, as you said the OP has not included exclusive criteria, and PHORE should add it into to OP to avoid such spamming, funny thread like yours in the future.
|
|
|
484
|
Other / Meta / Re: [April fools] New new rank requirements
|
on: April 16, 2018, 02:40:24 AM
|
Shitposters should be ignore by all members in the forum before they change the way they spread information (threads) in the forum. I don't support the idea to put users to Ignore list immediately to see their shits. The reason is sometime, good users (pariticularly newcomers) can unintentionally post shit threads because they are lack of knowledge, experience. They should have chance to improve. If uses put them in Ignore list, they might miss the opportunity to see evolved shitposters (gradually become more constructive, more knowledgeable over time). That's how poorly people around here think of shitposters and of the typical quality of posts in general--they'd rather give merits to someone who absolutely does not need them than to garbage shitposters. While I certainly don't agree with that (nor would I give Theymos or Satoshi merits), I can understand the frustration involved.
sMerit should be rewarded to only deserved members in the forum (constructive ones). It's a total waste of sMerits and there certainly are people more in need of merits who make posts good enough to earn them.
|
|
|
|