Bitcoin Forum
March 29, 2024, 01:48:40 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 26.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 [6]
101  Other / Meta / Re: The reality is 99.9% members can never rank up with the new merit system. on: January 29, 2018, 02:35:56 AM
I think everyone can have a chance to rank up; when I read about the new merit system my first thought was "ok, gg, I'll never reach the next rank".. my second thought was "ok, let's try and put some effort on my next posts, let's try to give something to this forum"
I made few posts and I got rewarded; as long as people keep sending sMerits I think it's definitely possible, a lot harder but still possible
That's it. That's the way Merits and sMerits circulate in the merit system, right? With the new system, users might feel hard, just a little bit difficult, to be ranked up, but it is really possible.

Old users seems to feel dissapointed simply and partially because the system launched at the wrong time, at least for their specific cases. However, new users don't care about the time, right? They will start from all zeros, including zero post, zero activity, zero merit score. They have so much time to collect enough activities, merits for themselves.

Let's adapt to merit system.
102  Other / Meta / Re: Please limit merit awards to one per post per person. on: January 29, 2018, 02:30:15 AM
It sounds impossible! It is also hard to pass the ball of responsibility to Signature campaign's managers. They don't have too much time for doing that.

Furthermore, as you can imagine, merits might be a little bit hard to get, not really hard, just a little bit. So it is not realistic to attached rules related to merit scores weekly for those joining signature campaigns.

Do you agree with my ideas? We can discuss more.
103  Other / Meta / Re: Merit & new rank requirements on: January 27, 2018, 03:23:11 AM
As I said in my previous posts, I totally agree with you. Merit system which highly correlated with ranking system is good, but it has drawbacks. And this one partially is a system of luck, of chance, of randomized generosity. Lower users have to almost totally or partially depend on others to be upgraded. Therefore it should be adjusted a little bit.
Merit system should include two parts:
1. One part for users effort for themselves. Increasing their merit points weekly, monthly by a certain number of merit points, such as 2,5 merit points per month, etc. in a way extremely stricter than maximum activities monthly. Final merit points per month should be discussed more.
2. Merit points they can get from others who appreciated their posts which are both useful and high-quality.

Two parts will sum up users' total merit points.

Thanks for the discussion and I appreciate your point of view. Just one final point - your first part is already achieved by the Activity system. It's based on your own effort, you get max 14 points in 2 weeks, etc etc.  So in essence, the two parts you mention just described what the current system offers.
I guess what the guy mentioned is two componental merits will combine into final merit points. For example, with junior members, if they are active, they will receive one of two merit points each month. I think this one is extremely stricter enough to stop spamming. That what this guy tried mentioning about first part.
104  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN]★CryptoBridge★BCO★🔹Decentralized EXchange 📈RELEASED NOW BETA🔹 on: November 26, 2017, 07:56:20 AM
Hi developer and owner of CryptoBridge,

Please add Solaris to the exchange. It's a good, potential coin, personally.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1831629.0
You can take a look at Solaris through the link above.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 [6]
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!