Пока дойдут карты выводить уже будет нечего. Доход с крипты значительно упал. Очень уже хочется получить на руки карты, хотя бы подержать эту красоту.

В Телеграме говорят что на следующей неделе нас ждут очень интересные и позитивные новости. Жду их с нетерпением.

In Telegram was update from dev's about news are coming in next week. I'm so exited about that. 

I recently came across this project, I was impressed, as I had not noticed it before, tell me how many coins do I need to run the masternods?

Что за чушь вы пишете! Прочитайте определение венчурного инвестора или венчурного капитала в википедии  И не пишите потом откровенную ересь про "обязательно входят на самом старте". Любой вход "в высокорискованный актив в ожидании высокой прибыли" - это по сути венчурная инвестиция.

Долгосрок это не трейдер. Долгосрок это называется инвестор. Не надо путать. Про 100500 сделок никто не говорит. Как уже писали выше, смысл трейдинга - найти верный вход в монету, дождаться роста и выйти как можно ближе к хаю (подтягивая стоплосы по мере роста актива). Если вы зашли в актив, поставили ордер на продажу на x10 и ждете когда оно продастся через 100500 лет, то вы не трейдер. Вы венчурный инвестор  

Тогда какого эта тема делает в Трейдерах? Если купили альты и холдим - это тема для раздела Альтернативные криптовалюты, но никак не Трейдеры.


А что мешает сделать то же самое с монетой из ТОП-200? Алгоритм простой - ищем просаженную монету с минимальным объемом дневных торгов, закупаем на всю котлету, ждем пампа, ловим хай, выходим и все - победа!

И если уж развивать тему надо ограничения не в ТОПах ставить, а в листинге на приличных биржах типа Бинанс, Битрекс, Поло и наличии минимально допустимого к конкурсу объема дневных торгов(ликвидности). Иначе хрен редьки не слаще получается!

Мне тоже письмо такое пришло. Почему нельзя как положено в кабинете майнекспэй документ перезалить? В чеке за квартплату ничего криминального нет, но всё таки как то странно почтой отправлять. Да и такими темпами можно не раз ещё его отправлять. Может все таки определиться со сроками и тогда уже документы подтверждать?

Почему карта приват банка? каким образом это связано с Minex coin? Ведь речь вроде шла о каком то зарубежно банке

By Republia whitepaper coins will be divided on:

- 39.000.000 coins were designated for sale
-  3.000.000 for bounties.
- 80.000.000 for Republia bank
- 21.000.000 go to the team and advisors

After ICO phase there will be 42.000.000 coins in circulation ( ICO sale+bounties).Price is settled at 1 coin = $1

By whitepaper,Republia bank will provide 70% yearly parking interest for 2 years.

Mining will bring about 10.400.000 coins per year, from which 50% goes to bank and 50% to the miners.So,after a year mining will bring 5.200.000 coins into circulation and same amount to the bank.


If we suppose that Republia team and advisors wont sell theirs coins during 2 years,we can make a caluclation:

- After first year - 42.000.000 after ICO + 70% parking rate will bring + 5.200.000 from mining = 76.600.000 coins will be in circulation after first year

- After second year - 76.600.000 coins from first year + 70% parking rate + 5.200.000 from mining =  135.42 millions coins in circulation after second year

After 2 years there will be 135.42 - 42 = 93.42 millions coins more in circulation or 3.22x more coins than it was on the beginning

It means that Republia will have to find huge income source in value of 93.42 millions of dollars to held exchange rate at 1-1 level.This is major problem.



Difficulties of maintaining coin in tight price range
---------------------------------------------------------------

Problem is that Republia only source of income during multi-year R&D phase will be money collected from ICO + money obtained from selling of premined coins.Money from ICO is designated for paying expenses for R&D and selling premined coins will just make whole financial situation much worse.

Fact is that Republia has no mechanism to keep value of investors money during multi-year R&D phase.It is weak spot of almost all ICOs,not just Republia,but Republia has one more major flaw - 70% huge parking rate which makes devaluation of investors money much faster.It would need quite big outer source of income,multiple times bigger than what will be ICO sale to prevent it. Despite currency intervention was mentioned in whitepaper,in Republia finance model such huge expense didnt even forecast or any other income source big enough to cover expenses of money interventions.So much about keeping exchange rate in tight mode.Inevitably,without money to cover expenses of currency interventions and reliable financial mechanism to achieve such goal,declining price of coins after initial hype will take faster and faster pace.

Principle of lowering Volatility by giving huge parking rate proved as utterly failure in Minex,Republia twin ICO and there is no reason to believe that it will be better in Republia.It is only generates hyperinflation and insisting stubbornly on it is at least awkward.It is exactly like if some central bank would control inflation by printing more and more money.


 
Price projection
-----------------------

In best case of price projection scenario ,during 2 years, value of RPB coin will drop for percentage of money supply growth, which is 3.22x or to 1-3.22= $0.31 dollar.

In reality,investors confronted with hyperinflation generated from 70% parking rate will lose trust and patience in coin much sooner,some time after initial hype and further shortly after first year of parking contracts expire. That will cause wave after wave of selling and put price in much steeper decline.Minex could be good example of it ,because it shares same financial model as Republia.


In such case when there is a massive inflation in system, price decline has to be count as a square of growth of money supply.So most likely scenario about price projection will be:

- First year,money supply will be 76.6/42 = 1.82x bigger than on the beginning. Price decline will be at least square of that  - 3.32x .Price projection after first year is 1/3.32=$0.3 per RPB coin

- Second year,money supply will be 135.42/42 = 3.22x bigger than on the beginning. Price decline will be at least square of that  - 10.4x .Price projection after second year is 1/10.4 = $0.096 per RPB coin


In the case of massive selling of premined coins,price of RPB coin will go further lower,but because volume of its selling cant be predicted easily, its precise influence on price cant be calculate.



Conclusion - what can be done
----------------------------------------

Conclusion is that if Republia does not find huge income source of cash or other enough liquid crypto currency to supress money supply and inflation generated by parking and mining,investors would face a quite significant lose of theirs investment value which pace will rise in time as it has been seen in Minex who shares same financial system with Republia.

Present Republia financial model is attractive mostly to speculators who always seek quick profit and is not interesting for project.It could bring strong capital inflow during initial hype and even stronger outflow after it which will leave market in chaos.


If Republia wants to attract longterm investors and provide longterm stability it has to radically change financial model:

- abandon providing "low volatility" through very high parking interest rate of 70% per year.Stability cant be achieved through money printing.

- abandon POW to POS system with max. interest of 10% per year or change parking rate to 10% per year.It will bring longterm investors who are interesting for project unilike speculators and significantly reduce inflation pressure.

- eliminate short-term parking options and leave only mid-term and longterm 3, 6 and 12 months option, or just longterm of 6 and 12 months

- find sources of income which can be used for currency interventions and maintaing financial stability. Money collected during ICO cant be used in a scale what is needed or it will hurt R&D developpment.

- such independent money source can be investing not needed money in more lucrative state or municipal bonds and/or through lending money on exchanges which provide such option or to others with all necessary guarantees for the case of non-ability of paying loans.Of course ,it can be sustainable only and just only if parking rate would be much,much lower than today , 10% per year or lower.

- making OTC tool like InstaSell which can be used as effective tool in fixing exchange rate


What will be,depends only from people who lead Republia.

Heaven or hell it will be what they decide,but one thing is clear - present financial model is longterm unsustainable and will devastate investors if remains unchanged.

And here to spread links to these videos are not? If not, for what reasons? Why bother to write about this without backing their words with references.

Teranode is in prototype phase exactly like Republia blockchain project. Only parts what Republia finished are wallet and bank, which is copy of Minex.

 Nothing else and it is easy verifiable for anyone who goes to Republia site. To get real test results Republia needs to finish all components and only when full integration is finished you can talk about capability of system.It will take years to do in best case scenario. Now it can be compared with testing airplane model in wind tunnel , when all other parts of plane,engine,airframe,avionics,landing gear..., are still only on the drawing board.Or like concept car.So ,there is a lot of work to do,but team is selling it like it is finished already and that is a problem.

Of course,every result should be verifiable by independent teams whose are not related to Republia in any way.

Teranode is different project from BCH-SV.Yes some parts can be compared,but Teranode incorporates much more that BCH-SV or Bitcoin itself,including smart contracts. This is not matter of new coin,but new technology.  

First, it is not yet finished. Only parts.Only when it will be fully completed we will see its real potential or lack of it. Testnet results are always more close to real situation than laboratory,but everything is just in cloud until project is completed. Then we will see what is capable for.

Coingeek Teranode project is more powerful than anything today. With 1TB block size and 6.700.000 transactions per second it is far superior than any project today.Along with token transfers, the TB blocks will also help process smart contracts, enterprise application, and machine-to-machine data transactions of many types.

The enterprise level full node implementation of the Teranode project employs a modular microservices architecture approach. Its creates four separate layers; business (RPC) Layer, Network (P2P) Layer, Process Layer and Storage Layer.

Significant difference between Teranode and Republia projects is that serving such powerful network requires extremely powerful hardware.Teranode works parallely on sofware and hardware solutions,but I didnt see that Republia even mention developping hardware solutions powerful enough to acheieve necessary transaction speed.

Fastest blockchain,but only in dreams. Again,misleading of investors and selling of non-existed products. Republia SC platform is just 34% finished.How can you test and called fastest in the world something which is so far from finishing,only 34%?? Making block every second is not something revolutionary.

Platform needs first to be finished,then experimental tests , then fixing bugs, testing again and at the very end putting platform on testing by independent testing team.






Today,the fastest blockchain which working is in progress is Teranode project by Coingeek, with 1TB block and the speed od 7 million transactions per second.

I checked with the developers. It was achieved in the "laboratory test network" the speed of 570 000 TPS. In a fully working network, it will be much higher.