 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 »
|
I hope magkaron kayo ng option sa load na kami ang mag lalagay ng mismong amount na gusto namin hindi yung may prefilled amount na  |
|
|
|
guys sa coins.ph ba may effect yung palitan ng dollar? For example $1000 worth of BTC. $1 is 54php na which means dapat 54000php na siya once converted. pero napapansin ko parang $1=51php lang. Can anyone please confirm this? thanks
Sa pagkakaalam ko sir kaya ganyan yung palitan dahil talagang may gap yan dahil dun sila kikita halimbawa magcoconvert ka talagang mababa yan pero kung bibili ka mataas yan kasi pwedeng maabuse na din at the same time. Ah so ditto na sila kumikita? Regardless ng value ng $$ sa market, may fix amount value na sila. All make sense, salamat! |
|
|
|
Tingnan ang thread ni utoy ngreport ng account farming at kadalasan mga Pinoy account ne report nya. Ok lng namn mg report pero kunting respeto rin sa kapwa Pilipino di kasi d tayo aasesnso nyan ganyan ang ating mentality. Ito ang thread nya: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5028967.0lol respeto kahit nandadaya? Ano yan #ProudPinoy pa din? tama lang yan. dapat talaga ipag rereport mga yan |
|
|
|
|
guys sa coins.ph ba may effect yung palitan ng dollar? For example $1000 worth of BTC. $1 is 54php na which means dapat 54000php na siya once converted. pero napapansin ko parang $1=51php lang. Can anyone please confirm this? thanks
|
|
|
|
|
isang negative nito merit selling and merit abuse. napaka dami na nag aabuse ng merit and obviously isa na dyan may mga alt account ditto sa bitcointalk
|
|
|
|
Up
Why images are not displayed ?
You are newbie that's why you/we can't post any image here unless you purchase copper account. P.S post was way back July, I hope you already figured this out  |
|
|
|
And you trusted newbies??  f*ck these kind of newbies. This is one of the reasons why this forum is being cautious to lower ranks esp newbies. Since they are offering PR service, did you even do simple KYC or just trusted them right away |
|
|
|
I was accused under a scam attempt of 150$ and I have solved the dispute and misunderstanding with the victim. He has also agreed with me and I also also repaid the Depth. Reference link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4671947.0OGnasty and KWN have given me a neg trust for this issue but I have already solved the issue now and proved myself innocent here ( OP of the reference thread has also confirmed it ). I would ask OGNasty and KWH to remove my neg trust as I am trying to rebuilt my repo here and I already have some very good deals on the forum until now. OGnasty has blocked me from messaging him, don't know why ! you can reply here if you have some issue @OGNasty. Because nobody wants to spam their inbox Don't spam the reputation sub board as well, just use this one to reach out to them. OGNasty is a reasonable man, he'll surely reply here. |
|
|
|
I don't agree with that statement. The ability to think critically or rationally isn't inherently tied to one's trustworthiness, in my not so humble opinion.
As much as I respect Vod--and I respect him a great deal--I think he probably shouldn't have left that feedback for the reason he gave. Obviously joerogers8 is delusional if he thinks the Earth is flat, but I think his views on that are only loosely related to trust on bitcointalk. There are a lot of folks who hold some very strange ideas, including religious people. You could argue that Christians, Muslims, and Jews live their lives based on a book of fairy tales, but would I give them a neg on the forum? No, not at all. However, Vod is entitled to his opinion and is free to give a neg to whoever he deems worthy of one. He's also the only one who can remove it, so this is an issue between joerogers8 and Vod. We can all give our opinion on it, but none of us can do anything about it. Among trust personalities here, this guy is really one of those who think based on the situation. If someone here is giving out opinion, I don't think it's fair to give them neg trust, we can just have a healthy discussion to talk things about. (don't get me wrong though, I don't believe Earth is flat, lol) Don't you think giving out neg trust is somehow harassment? |
|
|
|
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2204241 This user is engaged in the slander of many projects. Thus, it deceives users. I received information that he wanted money. In order to disprove that the project is a scam. I want the administration of the forum to influence this user. Because with me he stopped dialogue. And hid. This ICOEthics exposed many scams here. If you want the community to believe you, present your proof and not hearsay |
|
|
|
|
Isn't ironic when someone is accusing you about scam, you'll give him/her neg tag instead of defending your self.
|
|
|
|
|
To be frank to you, I don't think no big ICO will take risk to this service. You can't even disclose who's behind this service in public --> this is even a simple way to gain trust from your prospect clients.
|
|
|
|
|
Pharmacist is more reasonable than Lauda. That guy knows what he's doing. Lauda sometime being illogical, but this time I think the tag she/he/it made to you is correct.
And I checked your trust, Pharmacist not even on the list, why so mad at him?
|
|
|
|
I really loathe account sales.
But I will never judge anyone for escrowing them. Then anyone can do an escrow with account sales without tagging them? |
|
|
|
I'll just leave it here how stupid EQUI team is. Blame AmaZix but look what's written on your 2nd campaign.  Yes, but am also wondering why Amazix has not come forward to clear its name in all of this? Because Equi has ruthlessly blamed them ofcourse when it became obvious they were fraudulent. I am currently in their telegram group community and based from AmaZix statement, they have legal case against Equi and they aren't allow to give much info about Equi. Legal matter is different than giving out announcement to the public I guess. |
|
|
|
I'll just leave it here how stupid EQUI team is. Blame AmaZix but look what's written on your 2nd campaign. |
|
|
|
|
Green minded Filipinos will laugh hard for those names lmfao.
|
|
|
|
of course everything can be sold here even merit BUT the question is, "is it legal?" and I am afraid you'll be tagged because of this question. So goodluck |
|
|
|
|
If the ICO didn't meet the softcap and returned the amount of money to the investors but NO tokens where sent to bounty hunters due to the fact that the ICO failed, can you still call it scam?
|
|
|
|
|
From the first time you heard that the team is scam, you should have detached your self from them, leave the campaign and make an official announcement that you are no longer supporting the campaign. I think if you did that earlier, you shouldn't have encountered this.
Anyway, I do have a question, I noticed that there some ICOs who didn't meet the softcap and of course no tokens will be delivered to the participants. Will this be considered as scam?
|
|
|
|
|
