Hi dear player and @askgamblers,

We are unable to provide
We have already explained the situation in details.
This is how the theory of probability works:
While increasing the number of rolls the percentage gets closer to betting percent.
Win chance on the higher bets was less because the number of bets was lower.

We kindly ask @askgamblers to show this case to someone who is well aware in the provably fair games and knows the theory of probability.

We are looking forward to the fair judgment.


Thank you!

I think finding some issues and claiming its scam are totally different stuff. I mean even if you are fortunejack of course there could be some bugs, glitches, some problems etc etc, you can find an issue in any place, for example primedice is the oldest and most known one out there and they still have bug bounty on their games at stake and some find some bugs there as well. Just because there are "issues" in the website doesn't mean its automatically a scam.

Fortunejack probably has a bit of issues time to time, developer problems and with enough debugging it could be solved, aside from that I do not think they are scam at all, fortunejack is one of the most trusted and loved places on earth and they are already making insane amount of profit already so they do not need a reason to scam people anyway.

If FortuneJack would have been a scam they would have disappeared from the market a long time ago because they already made a lot of money with their casino. There will always exist persons that have different problems with casinos and say it is a scam but that's normal because it's impossible to see a perfect casino only with positive reviews.

In a word, I would like to say "If Fortune Jack turned to scam, it is something like a big bag in new era of crypto, one of the worst since the Mt. Gox years ago".
It's unrealistic to happen for such long-aged and high-trusted casino, like Fortune Jack.
Even when you don't have your own experience with the site, let's simply look at who participated in its signature campaign.
Most of them got high trust points, and the one makes sense, right?
It's unbelievable when high trusted users promoted scam projects. Not only one, but also bunches of high trusted users.
It's unreasonable to say FJ is scam.

Could you tell us why your site don't provide access to players' bet history while other sites can? What are you hiding?

Never mind people, looks like they don't like to lose reputation, i just got my coins in my wallet a couple minutes ago

With the good trusted site like FJ, I thought recently scam accusations on FJ are FUDs, nothing more than FUDs.
Of course, in the meantime we should stay calm and should not argue with fudsters too much.
It will partially unintentionally help them to spread their FUDs faster.

---

We should act smartly by keep ignoring those FUDs.

The same rule applies to all gambling sites.
You have 2000 rolls and known seeds so go, verify results and post proofs here.

You probably missed few posts. But go with good old "payed shills", that usually works 

Yeah, I also thought about it. But you see I kind of understand that the op does not want to make another 2k rolls just for the sake of increasing the sample, especially since he/she is convinced that FortuneJack is a scam. And besides, nobody said how many rolls is enough, so even if he goes through another 2k I bet there'll be people saying 'nah, still not enough to prove anything'. And I don't understand why FortuneJack won't provide more bet history.. I read the reply, I just did not understand whether it sounds like a real reason.

I have noticed that you have given me a negative trust as well as Hhampuz and TheNewAnon135246. You are claiming that you have asked us to stop promoting FJ and that is not true. You have never approached me with anything. You have never asked me anything and neither have you asked TheNewAnon135246.


FJ has already told you in their post that the game provider has cancelled the bet and that an investigation is under way. So you have tagged 3 users based on an accusation, it has not been proven yet! You will notice that I haven't tagged you yet. So do the right thing and remove your tag because your claim is false until proven otherwise! If your accusation turns out to be true those who promote FJ will either remove their sigs on their own or they will be asked to do so by DTs or staff.   

You haven't asked anyone to remove their signature. Instead you left negative feedback based on an accusation.

As FJ said, their game provider canceled the bet and they are waiting for their response. You are jumping to conclusions. Also, I would appreciate it if you posted from your main account.

Yeah... game-protect. According to him everyone is a scam. Dude believes you can gamble anywhere you want and reclaim whatever you lost back and the casino has to follow up with that. You can literally go to casinos, bet, lose, recoup, bet, lose, recoup and basically do this until you win whatever money you want. He just simply lives in a dream world where everything goes according to plan for the gambler.

Thankfully crypto casino space doesn't care about him at all which is the reason why we have so many casinos, if they cared about him they would probably go bankrupt in a day for paying everyone back on what they lost. Fortunejack or any other place, if you think they are scamming people you will see the reactions from the gamblers themselves, not from one or two sources, one person can have an issue with one casino but when 100 people have issues that casino usually gets shut down.