прочитав посты поймете и отношение к русскоязычным пользователям. Да уж, остатки твоих сообщений видел, спасибо, что попробовал. Но... машина идиотизма пока что сильнее воли простого народа. Вот здесь очень чётко видно отношение Лауды к русскоязычным пользователям:https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2994870.msg30834834#msg30834834Кому будет лень вчитываться в ветку комментариев и переводить, то вкратце это выглядит так:«Русские = равно спамеры, это не обсуждается. Им не место на этом форуме». Ей в ответ пишут нечто типа: «нечего предъявить по делу, так сразу поднимаешь вопрос национальности? Очень много полезных тем от русских было». Она отвечает: «Все вы русские — говно, и ты, человек, который мне отвечаешь, пишешь в русских темах... значит ты тоже чёртов спамер. Уходи отсюда» Ну и как этот человек может быть адекватным, находится в каком-то доверии у Администрации и вообще что-то решать?Ранее вроде как они действительно разоблачили немало мошеннических схем, а сейчас мне кажется просто слетели с катушек. Высокомерие присуще многим из DT2, но Лауда и еще несколько персонажей эт полный уже неадекват, я вчера почитал немного их сообщения, они стайкой бродят по многим темам) Если убрали у них право красить траст, то я думаю просто не стоит обращать на них внимание, так вчера завелись, возможно из за неуверенности в прочности своего положения) |
|
|
|
Have not received any rewards for some time now in promoting the project. Last one I got was on 2/17. Anyone else received theirs?
I get every day, but very little and the downward trend continues. On semblance on https://www.viberate.com still fails the new system of calculation of remuneration( I thought it only I have small charges, I do not know what to think, although the work is already carried out without spam.  I hope, however, that payment on www.viberate.com increase) With all the partnerships they are having and all the new talent joining the project, I'm sure ti'll increase fast and boom. Judging from the fact that the project is beginning to appear imitators, https://www.viberate.com he took his place and confidently moves forward) |
|
|
|
Я сделал человеку добро, он захотел меня отблагодарить меритом, это что-противозаконно? Он ищет мой любой пост, лайкает его, я получаю мерит, заслуженно, а тут какой-то ньюби или стукачок, будет проводить расследование, почему я за обычный коммент получил аш целый мерит!!!! Это мне кажется несправедливым и уж очень притянутый за уши. Денег хватит всем, как и работы, так что вместо того, чтобы чужие аккаунты просматривать, качайте свой и не мешайте остальным развиваться!  Это да, к сожаление в настоящее время, вместо борьбы с мошенниками, устроили террор обычным пользователям( |
|
|
|
Голосование по поводу меритов https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2994870.40, прочитав посты поймете и отношение к русскоязычным пользователям. С негативным мнением относительно DT2 теперь я полностью солидарен. Пытался как то сражаться, но неудобные комментарии почистили очень быстро, тч в конце снизил все же обороты, в бан все же неохота))) |
|
|
|
I'm not advocating Merits and do not complain about the lack of them) You misunderstood me. I just don't think the system is good and expressed his opinion. But for some reason many took this aggressive)))
I think that is pretty obvious. Thank you. The main flaw with your argument is that: Normal users who can post constructively isn't suffering. Even if they aren't given merits, they don't care about their rank. The only people caring about it is account farmers and those who eagerly wants to join a signature campaign but can't contribute actively. There is an issue if you care about your rank so much. In my opinion, the system is good and it is working. The forum is for people who truly wants to engage in conversations regarding Bitcoins and cryptocurrency in general. It isn't a place for people to post rubbish and spam up the forum with gunk. If you don't like the merit system, you probably are more interested in ranking up than discussion on Bitcoin. I certainly do not oppose raising the grade, I also participate in campaigns bounty) I Think that over time I have and increase. I also don't enjoy a lot of spam on the forum, I'm trying not to abuse it. Not let us be much more widespread, I think we understood each other. You really are a worthy opponent and many should learn from You) |
|
|
|
I mean posts in topics Airdrops. Such messages I have very little. I may not know English very well, but I'm trying to learn it. I have a lot of useful posts, but alas, it was rewarded only one of them.
Anyhow, that isn't an excuse for you to receive merits for them. Someone in the Russian subforum might give it to you but I personally wouldn't. The way I see it, you seem to be extremely sensitive with your rank. If you can post constructively, you would probably rank up the same time as you get your merit. But alas, we both know it isn't going to happen with your current state of posts. I'm not advocating Merits and do not complain about the lack of them) You misunderstood me. I just don't think the system is good and expressed his opinion. But for some reason many took this aggressive))) |
|
|
|
This posts in Airdrops, there is no point to write interesting posts, so You're not really right)
There's no need to write interesting posts. Your posts are neither interesting nor constructive. It's no wonder you're complaining so much about the merit system. It shouldn't work for those unable to post constructively. I fail to see how would you gain by asking that to every airdrop that you see. If you can't produce a single constructive post, you have no rights to be complaining about systems that are supposed to fix this problem. I wouldn't want to see people starting to copy and paste the same stuff over and over again while wearing a signature. Sweet. His plan is backfiring. I mean posts in topics Airdrops. Such messages I have very little. I may not know English very well, but I'm trying to learn it. I have a lot of useful posts, but alas, it was rewarded only one of them. |
|
|
|
I think we could take you seriously if you weren't speaking nonsense with zero statistics to back your points.
This posts in Airdrops, there is no point to write interesting posts, so You're not really right) |
|
|
|
Russian spammers are quite annoying. I'm waiting for someone to top the *~200 office employees* Russian spammer. Go whine somewhere else.  Attacks because of nationality? It seems to me that You have no arguments and therefore You acting like this) |
|
|
|
The system Мerit only harms the forum and stimulates competitors to create an alternative. I think you need to reward truly useful and quality posts, possible early grades, and not to freeze grade 90%, as happened in fact with the introduction of merit points.
What are you talking about? Are you mad? Merit system help the forum, makes it better day by day. Since it's launch, the system has performed well and demonstrated it's impacts on bitcointalk users, both lower- and higher-qualitied users to be more constructive. Spammers seems to reduce posting spamming threads and might give up when they realize that they got nothing from spamming the forum. Account farmers feel hard to survive and keep their farm running. It is much more difficult for them to earn money from the forum. This is not true. Spammers buy accounts with a high rank and continue on, and suffer all the others. With the introduction of the merit points the situation has not improved and everybody understands it. Lol, you said that simply because you can not contribute to the forum with high-qualitied posts; hence can not earn merit points. That's all. Keep spamming, complaining, crying about merit system; no one will pay attention to such a thread and never give it merits. Accept both the merit system and the fact. Good luck. You just don't perceive the opinions of others that differ from yours and immediately call them spammers, it makes no sense to continue the discussion. |
|
|
|
"NO" voting will win. The reason is simple: very few people, who are really interested in crypto-currencies on the forum.
People interested in and interested in cryptocurrencies don't necessarily have an opinion that coincides with Yours) Many of them do not have literary talent, but this should not make their people second-class citizens. IMHO, People interested in and interested in cryptocurrencies, in general, ranks are not are important). To write a good post, it is enough to have the necessary information, and to understand it. Just need diligence. So I propose to encourage people not to freeze the rank of the bulk. It turns out because of spammers and suffer normal people, merity can earn very, very few) |
|
|
|
"NO" voting will win. The reason is simple: very few people, who are really interested in crypto-currencies on the forum.
People interested in and interested in cryptocurrencies don't necessarily have an opinion that coincides with Yours) Many of them do not have literary talent, but this should not make their people second-class citizens. |
|
|
|
|
The system Мerit only harms the forum and stimulates competitors to create an alternative. I think you need to reward truly useful and quality posts, possible early grades, and not to freeze grade 90%, as happened in fact with the introduction of merit points.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
