Show Posts
Any one from community know is there any whitelist required?
Hi Team, is there any whitelist?
We will be doing it with cross chain atomic swaps so that it will be secure and you will have access to your tokens nearly immediately.
As for news updates, we have a FAQ that is rolling out as well as guides to use the ICO.
The KMD team ran a huge test with exactly 1 BTC worth of MNZ allowing them to realize where the issues were with the software. They have been smoothing out the operation of the GUI app so that everyone will have a great experience.
If you are looking for wallets they have been announced in the telegram announcement channel, and discussed extensively within the other channels.
Additionally, there was a great video from CryptoGrinders done today with a live AMA that went out this morning. See here for the following link to the AMA:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1aZO-B3pfg4
There will be much more stuff coming out soon as we get the BarterDEX application finalized and we will get the guides and final launch version of the dICO.
Many people have been asking if it is possible to deposit your KMD prior, to the ICO into your "smart wallet address" generated through the BarterDEX, and the answer is yes with a huge caveat - WE DO NOT RECOMMEND THIS. Please keep your KMD in a secure location until you can guarantee that you will be able to make a swap and then withdraw your KMD. These wallets are secure, but if you lose your key, your funds will not be recoverable.
Ther you go!
While reading this... I really guess you need some more time to finalise the token sale and technical implementation. I am really convinced from the idea of Monazie and the Komodo platform and how the team planes to archive all the milestones. However, it seems really hard for a non-tech guy like me to figure out how to participate in a dico like this at all. Im afraid this will lead the first "d"ICO to become something complicated instead of something innovate, what it is actually ment to be.
I remember previous ICOs where you had plenty of time to also study the ICO tech besides the actual white paper. I actually haven't seen any "manual" accesible to a "non Komodo involved" part of the future community. So of course, declaring the 6 hour bonus for KMD as a benefit for the KMD community is a reasonable approach to benefit current coin holders. However, the wide mass (which definetely has to occour since whales are ""blocked"") will be informed very late and will therefore probably pass on this opportunity due to the FUD of entering to late.
However, dont get me wrong, i will definetely be investing in this dICO but i just ment to point out some concerns.
This is actually why we made the final decision to delay. The non-technical user was having a very difficult time. This led to many other complications especially due to the reality of dealing with serious finances.
ICO postponed for the second time ...
Guys, no one limited you to time.
You did it yourself! Twice!
And you did not meet your deadlines TWICE! And it is just collecting money...
How will you work on the project? Also missing out on all dates? Your Roadmap is now worthless. Because now everyone understands that you are not able to work according to schedule.
You are justified by the fact that you do not want to expose users to the risk of losing money due to a low-quality exchange process.
No one would have said a word to you, if you had first worked on the exchange process (atomic swap), and then declared the dICO!
You are not able to objectively assess your capabilities.
You arrogantly state that there has not been such a project, and so everyone should run to buy your useless tokens. But what have YOU done?
Guys, no one limited you to time.
You did it yourself! Twice!
And you did not meet your deadlines TWICE! And it is just collecting money...
How will you work on the project? Also missing out on all dates? Your Roadmap is now worthless. Because now everyone understands that you are not able to work according to schedule.
You are justified by the fact that you do not want to expose users to the risk of losing money due to a low-quality exchange process.
No one would have said a word to you, if you had first worked on the exchange process (atomic swap), and then declared the dICO!
You are not able to objectively assess your capabilities.
You arrogantly state that there has not been such a project, and so everyone should run to buy your useless tokens. But what have YOU done?
I think you absolutely answered your own concern. While this has never been done, and then we have a significant concern about the quality of the swap application it is only logical that we don't proceed.
You are free to feel concerned about our ICO process, but it seems that you are very concerned about something that you claim to not care much about.
Please keep in mind we are working across multiple teams of people, who are international.
I will reiterate what I have told you in telegram, we are aware that the community is concerned.
These decisions were not made lightly, this was something we thought we could do in time, as two teams working literally around the clock.
As for what we have done? We have created a platform which provides integrated automated KYC and the ease and comfort of opening a bank account for small businesses from home, and further being able to manage it from your phone.
We have had complications here, but we are very aware of how we can grow and make this better for both participants and from a business standpoint.
Thanks to those who continue to support us, this is something we are attempting to rectify, and will proceed when we have full confidence in the dICO platform and its ease of use for the non-technical individual.
