|
I also confirm that v0.5 is unstable on 1060, overclocked or on stock - getting windows crash/close window. v0.3 worked without glitch, i didn't test 0.4.
|
|
|
|
|
Zelcash disabled on stocks.exchange since algo change ...
|
|
|
|
the old lolminer works but this one instantly crashes and windows reports gpu access for lolminer.exe has been blocked.
Nvidia or AMD and which of the algos? Will look into the corresponding code path to see if there are significant changes. may i ask ? how a 1050ti can get 14sols and a 290x gets 12sols...........i'm lost is this due to 144,5 is not AMD friendly as previously 1050ti does abt 160sols and 290x does 380sols...fyi using EWBF 0.3 for my 1050ti comp from ure view AMD opencl codebase of miner isn't optimized yet. It even says so in first FAQ question of first post of this thread. |
|
|
|
I have a question about the distribution of rewards for the block.
Reward 20 coins, miners 10, masternodes 9, development fund 1.
But I look there are payments for example: 9.6 +1 + 0.4 +9.
Or 9.84 +1 + 9 + 0.16.
But in some blocks this is not.
To whom is 0.4 or 0.16 for example?
I also noticed the same in explorer, interested in answer. |
|
|
|
|
As an difference from preview version, this one starts and works fine without hdd swapping (win 7 x64, 17.4.3 drivers, r9 280x). But performances are awful, 9-13 sol/s but with average of 12, roughly half of 1060 3GB on new EWBF 0.3 which makes it currently totally unprofitable to mine with. Hope for much better performance in next versions (r9 280x was getting 280-300 sols/s vs 300-320 1060 3GB on 200,9 equihash).
|
|
|
|
Hi guys, this night is crashed website of vic.pool.sexyNow all works fine. Dont worry your mining has NOT been lost  Stocks.exchange didn't credited some vic.pool.sexy deposits from 2 days ago. Their explanation is there was no enough gas altough on VIC explorer I can see transactions. Any help possible? EDIT: They deposited after 2 1/2 days arguing with the support ... |
|
|
|
You say "* Solver for equihash 200,9 has been deleted." and "I'll probably return 200,9 variant later"
Can you confirm that you are working on a Windows miner for 200,9?
You already have 200,9 miner, it's "old" EWBF 0.3.4b for ZEC, KMD, ... |
|
|
|
As I understand, C-Cex seem to be "one man show", so when owner goes on vacation, exchange doesn't work.
I really don't see reason why would anyone use it.
I would add it's more on "vacation" mode than working normally. BTW, last year BTCZ community had to pay 4 BTC to person (I wouldn't name it) which self-initiatively paid C-Cex for listing while many were against listing there. We see now those BTC's were spent unwisely ... |
|
|
|
A good project. Has prospects. I tell everyone!  and they're listed on yobit now And Yobit is very "reputable" exchange |
|
|
|
You cannot mine zcash with this miner, it will only work with coins that have forked to 192,7, 144,5 and 96,5. If you want to mine zcash you will need to use the original miner as it still uses 200,9.
Thank's Where can find what coins are at 96_5 ? Answered 4 posts above this one  |
|
|
|
I haven't read the whole thread so I don't know if this question has been asked, but what is the difference between 192,7, 144,5 and 96,5? What are these solvers?
These are solvers for equihash algo variatons with different N and K parameters. "Old" equihash (ZEC, ZCL, KMD, ...) uses 200,9. BTCZ, BTG, XSG, SAFE, ... are using 144,5 now. ZERO uses 192,7 (algo variation demanding most memory, about 2,5 GB VRAM), Minex coin uses 96,5. |
|
|
|
Update the stocks.exchange link please, they made a new website.
Exactly! Stocks exchange upgraded their platform, which has better interface for users. Snowgem team should update link to Stocks exchange in the OP. Deposits/Withdraws are not working on Stocks.exchange since fork - Status "Currency disabled". |
|
|
|
Current block reward for miners is ~11 XSG ? Cant see from pools lists of found blocks as almost all of them are hidding/not showing block rewards ...
I believe the block reward for miners is approx 11.84 XSG out of 20 total right now. Someone else from the dev team may be able to verify if that's accurate or not (I think it is). From block explorer i see it is 10.8-10.96 currently and online calculators are (wrongly?) showing 11.84. XSG devs didn't answered, they must be busy  |
|
|
|
I am trying to mine btg at suprnova and only get rejected shares, I use hiveos and mined at suprnova before the fork and worked fine, now I changed to new ewbf version, algo 144_5 and new port 8866 but I only get rejected shares, can anyone help me?  Are you sure you added required parameter --pers BgoldPoW? Yes I am sure. Just tried mining with this and it works fine for me (v0.3 of miner) miner --algo 144_5 --pers BgoldPoW --server btg.suprnova.cc --user username.worker --pass 1 --port 8866 |
|
|
|
I am trying to mine btg at suprnova and only get rejected shares, I use hiveos and mined at suprnova before the fork and worked fine, now I changed to new ewbf version, algo 144_5 and new port 8866 but I only get rejected shares, can anyone help me? Are you sure you added required parameter --pers BgoldPoW? |
|
|
|
so conclusion new test version it fix using device correctly (cuda 9.1) ....
Glad you found out solution, after all it was bug in device selection code. |
|
|
|
...
GPU 1: Gigabyte GeForce GTX 650 2GB (2048 MB) = used for my own necessitate, browsing, working, sometime gaming
...
With this setting i was play game on 650 & mine on 1060 ETH, Neoscript, old Equihash with out problem only now i can't use your miner because it say from start "ERROR: out of memory" with is something wrong
Bolded is your problem, 3GB cards are new required minimum. Your only option is to start miner only on GPU0 (3GB one), look few post above how to do that (in your case use parameter --cuda_devices 0 for GPU0). gsanjin if you was read i say GP0 is use only for mining aka always in any mining application i enable only GP0 aka in EWBF case i have "--cuda_devices 0" used, so what you was say is not issue, thx anyway @Overdrive5 you to was not read all what i write 650 GPU = "used for my own necessitate, browsing, working, sometime gaming" is NOT use for mining ... only 1060 read full post what done on previos page aka here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4466962.msg41579162#msg41579162Yes, on second read You're using v0.3? There were problems with 3GB on first versions of miner on Win 10 because of way Win 10 addresses GPU memory, but I see you use Win 7. Have you tried using --cuda_devices 1 maybe gpu ordering is wrong? Any difference if you try mining with just one card in system? |
|
|
|
...
GPU 1: Gigabyte GeForce GTX 650 2GB (2048 MB) = used for my own necessitate, browsing, working, sometime gaming
...
With this setting i was play game on 650 & mine on 1060 ETH, Neoscript, old Equihash with out problem only now i can't use your miner because it say from start "ERROR: out of memory" with is something wrong
Bolded is your problem, 3GB cards are new required minimum. Your only option is to start miner only on GPU0 (3GB one), look few post above how to do that (in your case use parameter --cuda_devices 0 for GPU0). |
|
|
|
What's current block reward? Online calculators are showing 7.5 GBX but last four days I'm seeing 6 GBX in pools Edit: Checked GBX explorer - yes it is 6 GBX. Hi there. The current block reward is 15 GBX. Since block 124.000 the split is 60% vs 40% Thanks for answer, time to send this as reference to online calculator webmasters And sorry i meant only on reward for miners |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
