This is definitely unintended behavior. The last used user seed should be automatically loaded upon logging in (it can take up to 1-2 seconds), and should never change unless the user types in a new seed or presses the randomize button. If anyone can provide me with specific steps to recreate an unintended seed change, I will gladly fix it and pay out a bug bounty. Please make sure to include your browser version and OS.

I have my lucky seed and I am unable to use it after I change my server seed? Why is that? Seems like a bug, fix this please, does not seem fair. If I have a good client seed, you can't just choose to make me change it!!!

This restriction is in place to prevent a situation where we (the house) could gain an advantage. We could intentionally generate future server seeds for your account that bias results against a previously chosen seed. We could, for example, generate a seed where the first few bets placed with your old or favorite client seed and betting style tend to have a higher chance of resulting in a losing bet. Disallowing reuse of a seed prevents us from this situation ever being possible.

The message is out of date indicating the restriction will be removed is out of date and will be updated shortly.

Apologize for any delays, should be processed.

Hot wallets normally don't empty too often, we aim to check the hot wallets at least 1-2 times a day. Occasionally we get a big winner, and withdraws the entire wallet. You may withdraw right after the player withdraws and our wallet check-in right before the player withdraws, and our next schedule wallet check in is at the end of the day, which leads to an unfortunate bad timing and maximal waiting time. But it shouldn't happen that often  

If your withdraw is a large withdraw requiring cold-wallet, we aim for at least 1-2 times a day. The wait shouldn't be that long, if we did the cold wallet processing, and one is right after, the next window should be at the end of the day. But usually should be reasonable speed 

Don't miss out the bonus on bitvest  

Giving away tons of prizes on chat, just level to 1, and claim bitcoins, ethereum, litecoin, bitcoin cash, and dogecoin.
And convert tokens into cryptocoins in the account tab.

I have my lucky seed and I am unable to use it after I change my server seed? Why is that? Seems like a bug, fix this please, does not seem fair. If I have a good client seed, you can't just choose to make me change it!!!

Hi acdc,

It is indeed a very special campaign that we're running now and until the 13th of April.

In short the cashback is on NET LOSS.
Eg1 if you've deposited 1 BTC and lost 0,5 then you'll get 30% of 0,5 back at the end of the week.
Eg2 if you've deposited 1 BTC, won to a balance of 2 BTC and then lost 1 BTC so you're back at 1 BTC in balance the NET LOSS is 0 and you'll not be eligible for cashback.

More info here: https://coindragon.com/campaign/cashback

Hope that this explains and that you find this offer as great as we think it is (as there are no strange strings attached!!).

Very welcome to CoinDragon!

So final words from us too.

First of all a week has passed and many, including us at CoinDragon, have advised you to go to an independent third party with your claim and you haven't..
Instead you send mails "threatening" to publish on Bitcointalk. Well not to be picky but you're already posting on Bitcointalk aren't you...

Violating the rules is against the T&Cs, end of story.

However we'd like to thank you for two things.
First for us verifying that our fraud detection system works as it should, but also allowing us to do improvements to it after your specific case.
Secondly, you are actually right that we took to long handling this issue! The case of using ALTs to try and fraud and exploit us was quite evident at an early stage, we should have been more direct and clear in our communication to you around this. We'll be sure to improve our handling should we ever (hopefully not!) need to adress a fraud case again.

The user created many alts in order to abuse and exploit our services and attempt to fraud us.
We have ample proof of this but as I'm sure the community understands we will not post it in this thread.
If Canada_1969 would like to pursue this matter we'd be very happy to cooperate in the investigation if handled by an independent party such as askgamblers.

I will update the original message to be clearer that it is a matter of abuse and fraud.

All your accounts at CoinDragon have been closed in accordance with T&C:s 3.5.
 
3.5.   You are allowed to have only one Account. If you attempt to open more than one Account, all of your Accounts may be blocked, suspended or closed and any cryptocurrencies credited to your Account/s may be frozen and returned or confiscated depending on the outcome of our investigation.

https://coindragon.com/info/terms-and-conditionshttps://coindragon.com/info/terms-and-conditions

The accounts were flagged early by our fraud detection system and immediate action was taken.
After thorough investigation enough evidence was collected to conclude violations of the terms and conditions and all involved accounts were closed.
The user account maple12 was informed.

Hi Guys,

The casino is a scam, be careful! Please read below

I am new here, but I like casino games, so I when I heard about coindragon from a friend, I could not resist to try.

The offer sounds goods, you get 100% of the winnings and get 30% cash back on your losses.

In my case, I deposited crypto, played one game (one flip), which I had won and tried to withdraw. Aaaand here comes the problem. The withdrawal did not work, so I contacted customer support, which redirected me to admin and after two email exchanges with admin, my account was closed with an excuse that I violet their T&C, which I have no idea how could I do so.. and of course, providing no proof (I did not even ask, because there cannot be any).

The site looks sketchy from the looks of it, but 30% rake back was a good payoff for the risk, that’s why I tried, but unfortunately got burnt.

Have all the print screens talking to customer support and getting two emails from the admin to serve as a proof.

Save you coins, go somewhere else.
Best

This replaces the old thread which was locked... and seemingly not going to get opened again for some reason.

EDIT: If anyone knows if the mods open those locked threads, do let us know. Feels silly to lose a 200-page thread because someone reported a thread for a rule that wasn't enforced... lol

Firstly, we again want to thank the player that helped us to find the bug, which might have affected some dice games played on our website. However, the case described in the initial bounty inquiry was extreme and relevant only with the option of playing over 99.90. The effect of the bug will drastically decrease while lowering the payout: if on 990x payout the bug had mistaken house edge and drew it for 10.89%, the aftermath from system miscalculation will be reduced, as the payout will vary (see the chart).



The case we had to deal with is no ordinary, and the company felt obliged to find a fair and relevant solution, so this took a couple of days. It has been years since we are in business, and the only way we kept our presence steady in this turbulent market, is FortuneJack's dedication to acting as fair as possible towards players and every each of them.

Following the logic initially set from a player in this bitcointalk thread and data that have been available for us to do calculations, we conclude the following:

Data Available as we clearly cannot tell when the bug started to affect our dice game, we decided not to start guessing and credit players from the moment we have the oldest record - November 2014, almost the date of establishment of the FortuneJack Casino.

What we have is Bet Amount and Win Amount recorded on our players. Most of the data is not kept forever, so it made calculation quite hard, and we had to rely upon more general and big data.

We have constructed the model of possible harm the bug might have had on players' bets, combining general assumptions and general knowledge to finally achieve average formula of payout for every player, who might have been affected.

We consider that most default style of play, practiced by the vast majority of players in to play on the edge of 50.00 and even the default game on FortuneJack Dice is Roll Under 49.50 (The bet that cannot be affected by bug), we decide not to calculate definite chance of default in our calculations and divide bets on rough two Over and Under 50. All the are Over 50 might have been affected and non who are under 50 could have been.

We have also calculated that, on average, playing case of being in the range of 50.00, the effect of the bug would have been 0.0198% following the model initially voiced in the bug bounty approach and written in the first post of this thread.

Following the data and module, we decided to econ average out of the players bet amount from November 2014 until today using the formula:

(Bet Amount * 50% ) X 0.0198% - Where every possible bet that might have been done over 50 on FortuneJack Dice by every player is multiplied on the possible average effect of the bug on the house edge.

Following this calculation, we have decided that starting next week, until the end of October, we will be airdropping this amount on each of the player's accounts that have the history of playing dice on FortuneJack.

To claim the coins back, a person will only need to log in to FortuneJack Dice, and everyone who might have been affected will get the difference that on average bug might have had back on their accounts.

We think our approach is fair and will make up for everyone. We believe finding the average effect was crucial in dealing with this case, and the final decision is equally reasonable to every dice player on FortuneJack.

We want to sincerely apologize for allowing the bug to affect the game and would like to thank players, the most respectful competitors, and the insightful Bitcointalk community for participating in the discussion.

We will post updates over airdrop in this thread shortly next week.
FortuneJack.

At last they stopped lie bacause fixed the problem with referrals registration. It took 2 weeks to fix this little bug which could be eliminated in 30 mins.

Chickendinner seems like he will take this one but the game is still long to go, there is still a lot of time for the other places to race with each other, I mean at least I hope that they will race against each other because otherwise there is a lack of wagered since the two competitions were so close to each other we may not end up with the same amount of wagered this time around.

I am not saying its not gonna happen but if it does it wouldn't be a shock, we just got out of a new competition and there is a brand new one right away. Hell even yoloer who won last time doesn't seem to be around for this time around, he either lost a ton of money last competition so he doesn't want to do it again or he just didn't realize and will eventually come. Lets hope the race gets fierce soon.

This is my address
bc1q8u77jpwcyuv6xdqa0cfwd469ax79lhe7v69n39

Someone quote me.
-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
This is Ene1980 from bitcointalk
 
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
bc1q8u77jpwcyuv6xdqa0cfwd469ax79lhe7v69n39

H+zvh5NHRNakG7VDdJiMPzReNCtQcIZusNoh0xityyI6EJ4npXqeyh/OpTcd+iZ2DpNnjFqi/HH7AwgBt7Odwqo=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Did that mate, just check one more time.

No, this is definitely not going to happen. Because gold is a completely dysfunctional metal. Bitcoin is an investment tool that has more functions than even money.