Show Posts
|
Pages: [1] 2 »
|
5
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Anonymity, Security and Privacy: Anonymous Cryptocurrency Enhancement Comparsion
|
on: January 02, 2018, 02:21:35 PM
|
that whole comparison was too much biased for Spectrcoin.
the same way spectr has OBFS4, CloakCoin has ENIGMA to a whole new way to do anon transactions.
ENIGMA is audited by a security company (COGNOSEC, listed on NASDAQ), Spectr is doing the same error as other coins do, which is bringing up the tech without knowing if it is 100% secure.
We saw this before, every month coins network get hacked because of lack of security, when ppl start to use spectr a lot that will attract attention of hackers, and then we will see if it is really secure.
|
|
|
7
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Anonymity, Security and Privacy: Anonymous Cryptocurrency Enhancement Comparsion
|
on: January 02, 2018, 12:38:16 AM
|
Good Thread! In regards to CloakCoin, i just sent you what should be checked on the spreadsheet. Its on CloakCoin thread, told by the developers themselves. plus, CloakCoin is since last day, fully OpenSourced, and uses its own tech ENIGMA (it didnt fork from zksnakrs, or other copycats) Tech people and Devs are digging in the code that was uploaded last day to github and are appearing in Cloak Chat and telegram to be in contact with the team developers. More info here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=823143.9780Thank you TSVHoff, I didn't realize how much effort had recently been put into this, fantastic news. I've updated the matrix accordingly and thank you very much again for the info. Super, just one thing, Cloak doesnt have Masternodes. ENIGMA is like a new way to do anon transactions. The same way Spectrcoin has OBFS4, CloakCoin has since last day, ENIGMA, which is a new feature on the anon crypto world. Its now being audited by a security IT company. also in the matrix "Enhacement", should be "OpenSource - Code Released"
|
|
|
8
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Anonymity, Security and Privacy: Anonymous Cryptocurrency Enhancement Comparsion
|
on: January 01, 2018, 11:37:40 PM
|
I agree that forks shouldn't be on that list...basically they are just copycats coins.
other thing people should stop posting is "Coin X is the only one 100% private" , its annoying.
I agree. It's a new list, and I want to be fair, so I'll consider things like community support for a coin (even if it is a fork), but I think it should have Some kind of unique feature, or at Very least a Roadmap that looks like it has a decent chance. If I strictly eliminated all forks, there wouldn't be any coins on the list except bitcoin (maybe bytecoin), with very minimal enhancements. One of the reasons I created the thread is also because many of the other comparisons out there only show certain coins that look inferior to the one declared the "winner". That's not at all what this is for either. But...yes...if I included every fork.....it wouldn't even be readable. fair enough please update spreadsheet about cloak when u can
|
|
|
|