Bitcoin Forum
April 25, 2024, 02:56:41 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 [47] 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 »
921  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [POLL] Do you trust BF Labs Inc. (Butterfly Labs) NOW? on: August 18, 2013, 08:06:42 PM
adding "maybe" as an option would be fair...

Maybe?   You can't "maybe" trust someone.  Either you do or you don't.
Trust requires time.  Trust requires experience.  Trust requires knowledge.

Maybe the question needed is: "Should you trust".  This is where Maybe falls into place.  

Maybe you should trust them, but more time/experience/knowledge is needed.

Most people treat trust as a knee-jerk reaction to a given situation.  I view it as a scale.

Pros:
Has shipped in the past
Is shipping now
Units work to specifications
Production speed seems to be inceasing
Happy Customers(perception)

Cons:
Slow
Repeated delays
Hard to get refunds
Poor design on some units
Perceived customer service (tough call, lots of whiners)
Unhappy Customers(perception)

You will always have unhappy customers, but you have to ask WHY?

Many early BFL customer had a dream... that they will receive this magic money making box and they'll get rich.  Time passed and others got the magic box first.  Tempers grew and time passed.  BFL started shipping magic boxes.  Joy was had and time passed.  Joy turned to anger, the magic boxes aren't coming fast enough.  Profitability drops and anger becomes hate.  REVENGE! they shout, refund our money! WHY?

BFL (and other companies) did as asked, they produced these magic money making boxes.  The problem was the demand for these magic boxes was so great that only the first few lucky ones could actually profit.  Who is ultimately at fault?  BFL and other companies for selling the boxes or the masses of people who over ordered them to the point they became worthless?

I did a time/motion study based on the theory that BFL had started shipping the equivalent of a mini-rig per day starting Oct 1.  At the end of 60 days, the calculation I used showed that they would not have shipped all of the orders they had received and likely would have not gotten far into July's orders.  If you hadn't received your order by Dec 1 you would never have reached RoI.  We know now that BTC rose dramatically, but imagine being there on Dec 1, mining 1.4BTC a day with your shiny new LS making a whopping $15 a day.  By Jan 1st you're lucky to see 1BTC a day.

922  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Value Estimate of Avalon Miner today on: August 18, 2013, 07:27:28 PM
I want to know the value of an Avalon miner.

I used this calculator with presets for a 3 module miner.
An additional step should be to discount each future week to the present value using some interest rate.  I have not done that step.

This gives me a value of about 70 BTC for an Avalon.

I am sure that many people would use different numbers for this.  For the power, I used 650 W * 80 GH / 65 GH --> 800 W, as it is overclocked.

I'd like to hear what other's think.


My opinion: 53 BTC

I think your model is too conservative.
923  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: KnCMiner list of orders on: August 18, 2013, 06:39:49 PM
http://mining.thegenesisblock.com/a/9e62ea57e7

With October shipping there no RoI... Bailout now, get your refunds!
the link you provided says you've got ROI and PLUS $1780 profit in October,
and even in November you get ROI PLUS $366 profit.

and I think you've also posted in the incorrect thread.
ROFL Sure, if you think difficulty will only climb at the modest rate it has been.  Open your eyes.

50TH jumps took from 22Jun to 7Jul, 7 Jul to 27 Jul, 27Jul to 5 Aug, 5 Aug to 10 Aug, 10 Aug to 14 Aug, 14 Aug to 18 Aug.  It currently looks like 18 to 20 Aug may be the next jump.

This speed increase is only get worse as more and more companies start shipping.

But hey, close your eyes, keep dreaming.  When Oct 1 rolls around you'll be wishing you listened.
924  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: This is why all Gen 2 ASIC Pre-Orders are a losing bet! on: August 18, 2013, 06:32:06 PM
Why limit this to Gen 2 ASICs?  The last month has shown an extreme speed up in network hash.  50TH jumps took from 22Jun to 7Jul, 7 Jul to 27 Jul, 27Jul to 5 Aug, 5 Aug to 10 Aug, 10 Aug to 14 Aug, 14 Aug to 18 Aug.  It currently looks like 18 to 20 Aug may be the next jump.

BFL is shipping. (yea yea, make all the fun you want, they are still shipping)
ASICMiner is dumping overpriced USB sticks.
Avalon just shipped 240-350TH of chips depending on who you listen to.
BitFury is supposedly up over 50TH
KNCMiner is coming soon
Cointerra?
Huh
Huh
Huh

I'm sorry, but if you don't have it in hand today, I highly doubt you will get anywhere close to RoI.

Had a guy in chat yesterday offering to sell 60GH BFL's he had in hand for $8000 each.  I told him he was high and that I doubted I could make RoI at $4000 and would only offer him $3000 if he paid shipping and guaranteed them to be here today.

A lot of these companies are going to go bankrupt if enough people put 2 and 2 together and see their money disappearing into an uncontrollable hash increase and start demanding refunds.  Why oh why do you think BFL has been denying refunds??? If they truly have only shipped 10-20% of all paid orders, that's a huge chunk of change to lose.
925  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: History Lesson on BFL on: August 18, 2013, 06:12:21 PM
Re: New monarch line

I would just like to point out from different sources, that BFL has shipped about 10-15% of all there pre-orders.   If you didn't know, BFL pulled this same tactic when they announced their ASIC line when they were still months and months behind on their FPGA line (Bitforce).   With how oversold their delivery schedule is, it makes sense BFL would announce this in the face of rapidly rising difficulty.  

I suspect many of there pre-order will have a negative ROI soon so they "had" to do this to give the people a distraction from the real issues.   Many may disagree but I see the same road heading to the same wall again.  


Your  public service announcement
-Dalkore


I wonder if someone who never got their FPGA, upgraded to ASIC and never got that, and now has upgraded to monarch.


This is what such a person would look like.


Always wondered what you look like man, boy, talk about P**** whipped!
926  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: KnCMiner list of orders on: August 18, 2013, 06:03:57 PM
http://mining.thegenesisblock.com/a/9e62ea57e7

With October shipping there no RoI... Bailout now, get your refunds!
927  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: BFL announces 28nm 600GH/S blade for $4680 on: August 18, 2013, 05:52:26 PM
mark .

Qnosh, almost all your comments state 'mark', why?!
He's a hairlipped dog?
928  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: mcxNOW Fee shares : Cryptocurrency daily earnings on: August 18, 2013, 03:23:52 PM
You fucking retard, why do u post my private messages on the public board.  If i wanted it public, I would have posted it ther myself.

You asked if someone was selling and I had shares I would sell.  Why the fuck would i waste my time and sell it the same price I got it for?  Obviously I will want a profit 

Idiot.


I have some shares I am willing to sell for .2 btc each.  Or 100 shares for 18 btc.
Really?? And what proof do I have that you own these shares?  And how do I know I will get access to these shares?  In addition, I've seen no post from RS stating he'll accept ownership transfer, so to me, you're just another scam artist trying to steal BTC.
Wow, you really don't know how to read do you?  I *NEVER* asked if someone was selling, I asked how CAN YOU buy shares of something that only RS knows who owns?

YOU were the idiot claiming there were shares on the black market, turns out YOU are the black market and YOU are nothing but a gold-digging asshole and potential scammer.

Also, don't blame me if you send 'private' messages to an unknown person and they get repeated.  If you really don't want it out there, then don't send it.  This message was sent to me and is now MY property and I am free to do with it as I please.  You don't want your laundry aired?  Keep it to yourself.
929  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [XPM]unofficial jhPrimeminer thread on: August 18, 2013, 04:06:24 AM
I switched over to 7.1 and when I ran the bat file to start it, the miner seemed to be working normally but my system acted like it was overloaded.  Took over 20 seconds to bring up internet explorer after I clicked on it and almost as long for it to close.  Is this normal for 7.1?

I ran 7.1 all day today running on all eight threads without any lag issues, but in the past I've had problems with lag when running on all threads, which is why I usually run it with 6. I don't think it should surprise anyone that your computer lags when it's trying to run at max capacity.
That's just it though, I did not experience this slowdown with V3, V4, V5 or V6.  I never tried V7 but V7.1 near killed it.  I tried it on 3 different comps with the same result so I'm back to V6 for now.
930  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [XPM] [ANN] Primecoin Release - First Scientific Computing Cryptocurrency on: August 18, 2013, 03:59:52 AM
I think we should wait until a GPU miner is actually released before we start guesstimating difficulties and those scenarios. I think a lot of people here are very desperate to 'strike it rich' on a new GPU miner release for this coin. It really shows in some of the other threads, to the point where it is cringe worthy.

Maybe it's just my line of work, but I don't believe in things until I see some evidence.

We have seen no evidence for a GPU miner, other than a few words typed on a webpage on the internet.

If mtrlt did not have a reputation from his creation of previous miners, then most people would too be as skeptical as I am.

Even if a GPU miner is released tomorrow, keep in mind that the 'difference' between CPU and GPU mining will not be as extreme as it was for bitcoin and the SHA-256 coins when its GPU miners were released. Bitcoin miners experienced a ~100 fold improvement on GPU if you were to compare them when investing an equal amount on the hardware (CPU vs GPU). A primecoin GPU miner will be far less of a improvement than this, some have speculated as low as only a handful of times more efficient than CPU alone.

The GPU miner's performance will depend to a good extent on the CPU itself. Whereas with current GPU mining it depends almost entirely on only the GPU itself. If you think your 5x 7950 scrypt rig with celeron CPU is going to tear up primecoin, well, maybe you are in for a shock. We'll have to wait and see.

I don't want to sound like a tinfoil-hatter, but there is also a chance this is an extremely elaborate scam. There has been almost $10,000 USD in donations sent to that bitcoin address now. It would not be the first time that a shocking scam has gone down on these forums and a lot of people lost BTC because of it. Also keep in mind that the buying/selling/exchange of accounts on this forum is permitted.

Assuming the above was false, I don't mean to diminish mtrlt's efforts and I wish him the best of luck with the development. That being said I think GPU mining on primecoin is unlikely to be the glorious horizon that so many seem to think it will be.
You are 100% correct.  Some calculations do run 100x faster on GPU, some only run 4-6 times faster, while others barely get a 2x boost.  I think the fermat testing will prove to fall into the latter areas.  The thing a lot of people don't realize is that you can't just take CGminer and make a few changes and presto it works.  This is likely to have been a major rewrite and then some.  I personally would want a 5x or better speed boost to offset the added power usage, 10x may be doable... 20x I'd be amazed.
931  Economy / Currency exchange / Re: Up to 15 BTC for sale(Accepting verified PPUSD) on: August 18, 2013, 03:46:16 AM
If he scammed you please leave a neg trust rating.
trust me, I did.  Fortunately PP refunded me when he didn't respond to the emails they sent
932  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: [XPM] The Unofficial Primecoin Overview Thread (all information in one place!) on: August 18, 2013, 12:52:02 AM
What happened the the GPU miner for xpm by mltrt? It looks like the thread was deleted. Did it turn out to be a scam/no product?

Closed and created anew: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=273637.0
And closed again due to whiners.  I'm sure he is still working on it, he's just not dealing with the drama on here. 
933  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [XPM] [ANN] Primecoin Release - First Scientific Computing Cryptocurrency on: August 18, 2013, 12:42:00 AM
As someone new to Primecoin, can someone explain to me how this was not created to be only beneficial to early miners in the first month, with little profit or incentive for future miners?

In the first two weeks of Primecoin's life, over 100,000 coins were generated a day while difficulty was around 7. This means that it was both relatively easy to find blocks and blocks were highly valuable.

http://cryptometer.org/primecoin_90_day_charts.html

In just one month the number of coins generated per day has fallen to ~10K and at the same time it is much more difficult to find a block due to increased difficulty. Which means that the amount of coins received per work falls exponentially since it is both harder to find a block and blocks yield fewer coins.

With GPU mining about to come out soon, the difficulty will rapidly rise and we can expect only ~1K or less coins to be generated per day. This is an insignificant amount compared to the first two weeks.

What this means is that those that got in early (first 1-2 weeks) will have generated most of the coins for themselves, leaving little incentive or room for profit for those not involved in the launch.

I was pretty interested in participating in Primecoin when I first saw it recently, but after exploring more it seems to be designed to overly reward those that launched it with little benefit for anyone else. To me those are not traits for a successful alt coin.

Couldn't you say exactly the same about bitcoin a few years ago?

All crypto coins have an early adopter benefit, bitcoin is no exception.

My point is that the decrease in block reward payout greatly exaggerates this effect in Primecoin. Once GPU mining comes out the per block reward will decrease significantly, which means that those mining in a few months will never be able to mine the # of XPM that individuals were able to in the first weeks, no matter how much H/W they add. With bitcoin you may need a lot more H/W now to mine coins with ASIC difficulty, but roughly the same number of coins per day are released.

With Bitcoin, today 3600 bitcoins are released every day while 7200 bitcoins were released per day in the first 4 year period.

With Primecoin, in the first weeks over 100K coins were mined per day. Soon with GPUs most likely only 100s of coins will be able to be mined per day. That is very unbalanced.
If the GPUs caused it to drop to 100s of coins per day, don't you think they'd leave in a big hurry?

To reach this unlikely scenario though, difficulty would have to climb somewhere in the neighborhood of 35-50 which I doubt is possible.

Remember also, primecoin has no cap like bitcoin, so a different method of limiting coins was put into place.
934  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [XPM] [ANN] Primecoin High Performance on: August 18, 2013, 12:25:09 AM
I have this on one VPS:

    "chainsperday" : 1.13775088,

Is that about 1 block a day?
I'm at .86 and found 4 blocks over 7 days.  Maybe in the long run, yes, but random still affects.

Alright, thanks. I am still deciding to mine this or other alt coins w/ CPU power.  Roll Eyes
Personally I don't think the other CPU only coins are as profitable.  I could be wrong though.
935  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [XPM]unofficial jhPrimeminer thread on: August 18, 2013, 12:22:39 AM
I switched over to 7.1 and when I ran the bat file to start it, the miner seemed to be working normally but my system acted like it was overloaded.  Took over 20 seconds to bring up internet explorer after I clicked on it and almost as long for it to close.  Is this normal for 7.1?
936  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [XPM] [ANN] Primecoin High Performance on: August 18, 2013, 12:14:37 AM
I have this on one VPS:

    "chainsperday" : 1.13775088,

Is that about 1 block a day?
I'm at .86 and found 4 blocks over 7 days.  Maybe in the long run, yes, but random still affects.
937  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [XPM] [ANN] Primecoin High Performance on: August 17, 2013, 11:51:08 PM
I have to admit I'm having mixed feelings about -hp9.  7 days ago I took my 2400 and 2500 out of ypool and started running -hp9.  The 2500 found a block that very day, I was happy.  Day 3 the 2500 found another one.  Day 6 and 7 it  also finds blocks.  The 2400 completely struck out and been switched back to ypool.  I estimate I was getting 5-7 XPM/day at ypool before I switched.  The 4 blocks plus 9xpm at ypool seems to indicate I did well, but that goosegg on the 2400 kind of rankles :/
938  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Butterfly Labs CEO 25 Million USD Mail Fraud — A Concise Summary of Evidence on: August 17, 2013, 09:34:33 PM
How about we try for something that MAY be fantasy but is a hellova lot closer to the truth.

We need some facts again...

1) Between Avalon and ASICMiner it is estimated they have added 160-180TH to the network.  Let's call it 180.
2) Current Network hash as seen http://blockchain.info/stats has been between 450TH and 500TH during the 8 hours I've looked at it today.  We'll say 450.
3) There's 270TH of missing network hash out there.

Where has this come from? 

Let's go back to http://bfl.ptz.ro/ a second. Using the 4951 orders listed on the site as a reference along with the 3575 Jalas, 1230 LS', 2678 Singles and 185 minis listed on it, we can infer on average 2 of every 3 orders has a jalapeno. 1 of every 4 has an LS, 5 out of every 9 has a single and 1 of every 27 has a mini.  I realize this is not 100% accurate information, but it should be fairly good for an estimate.  So using this and what we know about #'s of orders made let's step into a more realistic fantasy:

Jalapenos are on 12/05 ship date and we know that ~14000 orders were made by 12/05
Little Singles are on 09/10 ship date and we know that ~8000 orders were made by 9/10
Singles are on 6/30 ship date and we know ~2700 orders were made by 6/30
Minirigs are on 7/21 ship date for 1/3 and we know ~3700 orders were made by 7/21

This gives us an estimated 10k Jalapenos, 2k littie Singles, 1.5k Singles and 140 minis.

10K * 5 = 10TH... 2k * 30 = 60TH... 1.5k * 60 = 90TH... 140 * 500 (only 1/3 has shipped) = 70TH...

50TH of jala + 60TH of LS + 90TH of Singles + 70TH of minis gives you 270TH.  That looks a lot like our missing amount of network increase.

Coincidence? You decide.


What about the still operating gpu and fpga rigs. I think the last time i checked their hashpower was arround 20 to 35 Th combined (i could be wrong here).

As I highlighted above.....
939  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Butterfly Labs CEO 25 Million USD Mail Fraud — A Concise Summary of Evidence on: August 17, 2013, 07:55:52 PM
This thread was an interesting read, a lot of opinion and lot of mud slinging, a crapton of outright lies and a fair amount of truth.

Since most of this thread is "he said/she said" or completely made up shit to cause trolling let's start off with FACTS, and these are VERIFIABLE FACTS.

1) BFL is shipping product - FACT.
2) Different product lines are shipping at different rates and are at different paid dates - FACT
3) BFL has had over 72,000 orders placed - FACT.

Sure, some orders have been cancelled, some refunds have been paid, but there's no number here.  We can acknowledge it happened, but not to what extent.

Let's step into fantasy a second... (For this I will be using some infor from http://bfl.ptz.ro/ to back up my points)  Let's pretend there are 72,000 total orders, that every order was for 1 item, that no refunds have been made and go from there.  We know as fact BFL is shipping Jalapenos that were paid for on Dec 5, 2012.  ~14000 orders were made by Dec 5th, 14/72 = almost 20% of Jalapenos ordered have been shipped (this IS still fantasy remember).  LS are listed at Sept 10.  ~8000 orders were made by Sept 10, 8/72 = 11.11%.  Singles are up to June 30th, ~2700 orders were made by June 30, so 2.7/72 = 3.75% and lastly we have Minirigs at pay date July 21, ~3700 orders had been made by 7/21, 3.7/72 = 5.1%.  I think it's safe to say this numbers are pure fantasy and makes it look like BFL needs another year to catch up.

Let's step into a different fantasy, but with some thought put into it.  It's June 2012, people are using FPGAs and GPUs, Network hash is about 12TH and people running 10GH are making over 6BTC a day.  They've invested 10's of thousands of dollars into their GPUs and are seeing $800-$900 a month in returns.  Mid June an announcement is made... ASIC preorders will open up on June 23rd.  The money spent on a 10GH GPU farm would buy almost 400GH of ASICs.  June 23rd rolls around, pre-orders open up and in less than a day 2000 people have placed orders.  Investors hoping to have the 1st units buy 20-50 units.  GPU farmers buy 5-10 apiece.  The average joe buys 1-2.  Lots os variable here, but let's pretend the average 1st day order is for 15 units of something.  Since it's still fantasy we'll say the remaining 70,000 orders were for 1 unit each.  Gives us some nice round numbers.  2k*15 + 70K*1 = 100k total units.  Let's look again at Jalapenos... Dec 5 is ~14,000 orders, but instead of 20% of the way through the order book, we're now at 42%!!  The Sept 10 orders of LS' with ~8000 now is 36% of orders!!!  The 2700 orders by June 30th make singles at 30.7%!!! and those ~3700 orders by July 21 = 31.7%...... wait.... only 1/3 or mini's have shipped... 10.6% Sad Sad  Still, Jalapenos will be completed in under a month,  LS and Singles may take 3 months and MINIs may take 4-5 months.  BUT!  THEY HAVEN"T RAMPED UP PRODUCTION YET!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Ahh, I love that fantasy, it makes me all warm inside.

How about we try for something that MAY be fantasy but is a hellova lot closer to the truth.

We need some facts again...

1) Between Avalon and ASICMiner it is estimated they have added 160-180TH to the network.  Let's call it 180.
2) Current Network hash as seen http://blockchain.info/stats has been between 450TH and 500TH during the 8 hours I've looked at it today.  We'll say 450.
3) There's 270TH of missing network hash out there.

Where has this come from? 

Let's go back to http://bfl.ptz.ro/ a second. Using the 4951 orders listed on the site as a reference along with the 3575 Jalas, 1230 LS', 2678 Singles and 185 minis listed on it, we can infer on average 2 of every 3 orders has a jalapeno. 1 of every 4 has an LS, 5 out of every 9 has a single and 1 of every 27 has a mini.  I realize this is not 100% accurate information, but it should be fairly good for an estimate.  So using this and what we know about #'s of orders made let's step into a more realistic fantasy:

Jalapenos are on 12/05 ship date and we know that ~14000 orders were made by 12/05
Little Singles are on 09/10 ship date and we know that ~8000 orders were made by 9/10
Singles are on 6/30 ship date and we know ~2700 orders were made by 6/30
Minirigs are on 7/21 ship date for 1/3 and we know ~3700 orders were made by 7/21

This gives us an estimated 10k Jalapenos, 2k littie Singles, 1.5k Singles and 140 minis.

10K * 5 = 10TH... 2k * 30 = 60TH... 1.5k * 60 = 90TH... 140 * 500 (only 1/3 has shipped) = 70TH...

50TH of jala + 60TH of LS + 90TH of Singles + 70TH of minis gives you 270TH.  That looks a lot like our missing amount of network increase.

Coincidence? You decide.
940  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [XPM] [ANN] Primecoin High Performance on: August 16, 2013, 11:04:49 PM
There is that.. Hard to say what the future will bring.

To put things in perspective, just the processors in a cc2.8xl are $3200, a dell with 4GB of ram and something similar to those two well over $5000. You would need one hell of ROI to make that work. Of course lower end/used stuff is cheaper but storing/powering and cooling 50-100 servers aint cheap.

Yeah, but nobody is going to run Intel Xeon processors in a desktop.  They're horrendously expensive for their return.
I paid ~$80 for my AMD Phenom II X5 955 and it churns out ~0.80 chains/day.
I paid about $100 per 1.00 chains/day, whereas Amazon paid $1200 per 1.00 chains/day.

You don't need server grade hardware for poor man's number crunching.
I thought the Phenom was better at running this, my 2400 and 2500 are at .86/.88.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 [47] 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!