That is very true, its a very important aspect of bitcoin, one of the most significant differences from the regular, fiat currency- goverment can't control it.
For sure, many people would hunt Satoshi Nakamoto just for profits, it is kind of obvious that the quantity of BTC owned by Satoshi is incredibly huge. Im pretty sure that also, many politics and law enforcement representatives would want him in their control.

You should bear in mind that Satoshi Nakamoto has to be very smart person, with good programmer skills.
He made his cryptocurrency (BTC obviously) anonymous, im sure that he knows how many people would like to get him in his own hands.

Many people seems to be terrified that Satoshi Nakamoto identity is not known, which is kind of understandable- having so many bitcoins causes that some part of BTC community is simply afraid of him.
Actually, they are not afraid of him: they are afraid of how many BTC Nakamoto owns.
However i don't expect him to cash them yet, i would sit calm and wait for better price.
And make small sell orders, not many big ones.

I love the name!

Really clever use of two words mashed together. Proves that admins have probably spent some time coming up with that name alone.

However the design on your site seems a bit lacking, especially your logo. It seems like you have got the site from a purchased script instead of developed by yourself, as it looks suspiciously like PrimeDice(correct me if I am wrong).

You should look into hiring a proper graphics designer, as the person you're hiring(if you are hiring anybody at this stage that is) isn't doing the best job possible out there. Look at Yolodice, their success is probably 90% their clean site design.

Just my 2 cents.

I was wondering if your virtual credit cards for the purpose of verifying PayPal accounts, aka the ones that you showed in the OP are still available for sale right now?

Because I'm currently in need of one of these cards. Let me know, thanks.

No not really because the phone exchange market has a lot of big players in it and if You are in experienced or new to the market then you really don't stand a chance against those experienced professional Traders.

Usually trading is a neutral sum game. However when you take into account that you are competing against these traders that have more experience than you, and that you have to pay fees on each trade you execute as well as having significantly less funding than those traders, it becomes gambling. It's a negative sum game at best. If you use leverage you will lose all your money eventually.

That won't win you anything, and is as good as saying nothing at all.

"Play smart". What do you mean? He's asking for a strategy, aka how to play smart. And you're telling him to play smart? That's like when someone asks you how to do a maths question and you be like "do it".

I'll tell you the truth however, there is no way that you'll beat the house in gambling.

They have the house edge in favour of them, which means you'll never win statistically speaking, in the long run.

You can always make sure that you reduce your house edge though, by following the basic startegy in blackjack if you are playing blackjack that cuts the house edge down by quite a lot. You can also try house edge rakeback sites like the one that debuni has opened.

Apart from that, unless you're playing PVP games like poker, there is no way that you can win in the long run.

Yes, which is why i went on to say that altcoins like Monero and Dash are probably the thing that law enforcement should be more worried about because these coins are 100% speculation + illegal usage.

I take that back though, bitcoin is only pseudo-anonymous, which means that there are addresses that can be traced publicly, but it is very very difficult for someone who doesn't have access to top secret government info to trace down these individual addresses to link them to an individual.

Anyways, thanks for pointing that out.

Agreed.

Bitcoin will continue to be the #1 cryptocurrency in the world probably for a long time. Which means that its price level will indicate the health of the entire cryptocurrency ecosystem as well as user engagement.

People will continue to look up to bitcoin for guidance, altcoins and users alike.

In my opinion, once this debate about block size ends, then people will start buying into bitcoin again, and bitcoin's price will climb.

$1,100 is proven to be an easy barrier to break, next stop is $1,500.

You are only half right.

Gambling is anything that has an unknown risk, or a risk that is known to be negative towards you.

So playing poker is considered gambling, playing blackjack is considered gambling.

If you play blackjack and you are experienced, you can drastically shrink the house edge towards your favour. So you stand a better chance of winning against the house than a newbie who doesn't know strategies of blackjack. If you are playing pvp poker, obviously if you are skilled then your opponent have a big chance of losing to you if they are inexperienced.

However, if it's just a dice game, sure, experience does not matter at all.

I feel like that December is a good estimate on when bitcoin hits this price.

Although there is negative energy about bitcoin right now, the price is still sticking around between $1000-$1100. Once the decision made regarding the hard fork i think it is way easier for bitcoin to climb in value.

$1500 is a short term goal though.

In the long term, when fiat collapses, bitcoin will rise in value to more than $1 million even, as a result of hyperinflation.

Bitcoin is an asset that will hold your value, much like gold.

True, but it is anonymous.

People shouldn't be worried about bitcoin to be honest. Bitcoin is like cash. It is technically anonymous, but it has a traceable ledger that people can refer to to find out about transactions that one person has made.

Monero on the other hand, is designed for cyber fraud and money laundering, to be honest.

There is really no point of having anonymity beyond bitcoin's standards.

And i certainly do not think that terrorists are even aware of bitcoin yet. They would rather stick to the cash the government issues.

Domains here are bought and sold for less than 0.01 BTC regularly. Of course it really depends on what the domain name is.

You'll find much better chance of getting a loan if you establish yourself first in the community and then asking a loan with collateral. Right now most people will think that you are like any other newbie scammer looking for free coins from stupid people.

Anyways, share your domain with us and we'll see.

And 4-7 months is just ridiculous. And your story doesn't add up. I wish i could start my website for 0.01 BTC, lol.

True, but then think about it. You could be using cash to fund terrorism as well.

It's not just bitcoin's fault that it is used for illegal activities. Otherwise you'd be also blaming the government for issuing notes that don't have tracking on them, so that money laundering and bribing and other whatevers can happen, using the government printed money.

No, it's not bitcoin's fault.

People can use cash however they want to as well, are you going to say that cash is bad too?

Think about the merits of bitcoin instead of focusing on the negatives. As a seller on the internet i know for a fact that whenever someone sends me a bitcoin payment, there is no need to worry about chargebacks. But when I accept paypal, i have to do background checks on the person to see his previous trades and whether his paypal matches with his story.

Bitcoin is completely interchangeable. 1 bitcoin from you is 1 bitcoin from someone that might not be as trustworthy.

But Paypal, it's different. Credit card payments and paypal, their value differs from the person that you receive it from, because someone you don't trust you're probabyl going to charge them higher rates in paypal or CC terms.

PD stats is the first name that comes to my mind at least when i want to have a site related to "Primedice's stats"...

Personally i think that this name would be much better than pd3.co... Because PD3 has been outdated by almost a year now, lol.

And I don't think that nahtnam is trying to do anything to damage the traffic to hui's site...

Try The_Bitcoin_Guru, he is willing to send first to you so no hassles.

Here is his profile: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=952962

However he does charge a 15% fee on top of the spot price, i don't think you'll be willing to accept that offer.

If i had still used Paypal, i would do this for you. Unfortunately i don't use Paypal anymore after being charged back hundreds of dollars a few years back.

It is paid from the site's cut.

If you look at all of the casinos that operate on a crowdfunding basis, then you'll see that the site's cut is split into a)promotion of the site, b)running the faucet and c)paying for server fees and hiring people etc.

It is definitely not from the investors.

Ethan could pay it himself as well.

BTCjam has closed all loan requests i think without any explanations.

Their platform currently isn't functional at all either, which is pretty strange for a site that has such an established reputation already. I wouldn't be surprised if it is as a result of high scam rates and people getting hacked and cashing out the hacked accounts by taking out loans, withdrawing the bitcoins, and of course, never ever paying the loan back.

Their twitter account has not been active for a while either.

Hope for the best, expect the worst to happen man.

Exactly. People shouldn't panic just because there is a fork.

There will be a fork that fails, but then you will receive 1 Bitcoin Core Coin and 1 Bitcoin Unlimited Coin on each bitcoin you own anyways, so it shouldn't be a problem. I mean there may even be a future fork that is more accepted by everyone in the community that replaces both BC and BU, nobody knows.


I'm prepared to do that as well, as long as the fork hasn't happened yet

I don't think that it'll necessarily affect bitcoin's status as a store of value.

The reasoning behind this is that you don't need something to be a functional currency to be a store of value. For example gold and silver, are they divisible? No. Are they interchangeable? Not really, as you have to go to such trouble to verify each bar's purity.

But yet, mankind still perceives gold and silver as the ultimate store of value.

The same with bitcoin in my opinion, even if it doesn't scale, it'll be digital gold.

Fortunejack, you know very well that people never read the terms and services.

When people use bitcoin to gamble there is only one reason. To be anonymous. And when you are anonymous that means you are able to register as many accounst as you want to wwithout having to be limited.

Now, whats the point of your rule of no multi accounting anyways? You guys aren't a sportsbook. All your games are -EV and you should be happy that people are using multiple accounts to bet as that generates more volume for you guys. Does Just-Dice or primedice prosecute people for having multiple accounts? Absolutely not.