 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 »
|
|
This is a project run by children. Deep Onion ran out of airdrops so this is the next iteration. There is no future for this coin. I bought in early because I liked the overall message, but as time went on it was clear that the original message was not true to the beliefs of whoever is running this, it's just a money making scheme. That is the risk with a lot of the airdropped projects, though occasionally you find true gems in this manner. I do not believe this project is one of them.
That doesn't mean you can't make money off it. Obviously with airdrops that is the case, though the value is likely to continue to plummet with the current BTC market at a rate faster than coins are airdropped/staked. But without a run-up like BTC had last year and a corresponding alt-run, this is unlikely to ever materialize into anything worthwhile. So if you are truly interested in a crypto project with real world potential, look elsewhere. If you are willing to jump through hoops for small amounts of PRiV which you can then convert into small amounts of BTC, then by all means this is a project for you.
|
|
|
|
|
anything big coming through the pipeline soon?
|
|
|
|
When twist web wallet is coming? If I remember correctly, it was supposed to come in last weeks of June. Then after Cryptopia listing it got delayed and we were told that it is coming in first two weeks of July. We have been speculating ever since.
They shared teaser images on discord a few days ago. It should be any day now. |
|
|
|
|
eagerly anticipating web wallet release, should be any day now
|
|
|
|
|
When will we see some of this work in action? Any upcoming dates as far as allowing us to test some of the features we've been seeing.
|
|
|
|
|
Very exciting to see all the progress begin to materialize. DNotes has been doing this the right way with organic, natural, sustainable growth. As a result we have a stable price point while all the hype coins pump or bleed excessively with every 2% BTC movement.
|
|
|
|
|
I still see no mention of a specific number of followers to participate in the twitter campaign but on the discord was hearing a number of 200. Can we get some clarification regarding that?
|
|
|
|
|
any update on when online wallet will be released? from what i remember team was pretty close to that milestone
|
|
|
|
|
I'm sticking around for AD5, but as someone who had no problems with AD1 and AD2 that got skipped for AD3 (Activity, after being told here were minimal activity requirements but not catching there was a new weekly tweet requirement) and AD4 (outdated signature which was changed without announcement, only in a separate - unnecessary subgroup - for signatures) if I get a same day, after the fact, notification for AD5 again telling me there is some new technicality to justify my exclusion I'm out. Can't be spending all this additional time on discord and bitcointalk providing marketing without reward, that isn't right. Which is a shame too because the project itself seems promising at the moment at this young stage. Certainly if a complete shitcoin like Verge can obtain success, Privcy can make real noise in the privacy coin sector.
|
|
|
|
|
Project moving along nicely. Getting back on CMC is nice, the volume picked up unexpectedly to accomplish that but I'm not complaining.
Stocks.exchange redid their user interface recently as well, which is where I buy my note, which is nice to see.
|
|
|
|
So I had another Mercatox moment today. A few hours ago I placed a limit buy order of 25,000 DNotes for 620 Satoshi. At the time there was a standing sell order of 400 DNotes for 620 Satoshi. So as soon as I placed the order I immediately bought 400 DNotes and that eliminated all sell orders for 620. Not too long after that, A sell of 25,084.1 DNotes at 620 Satoshi executed. But not one bit of my standing limit order at that price was filled. It still sits on the order book at 24,600 DNotes for 620 Satoshi and it might never fill because the price has been going nowhere but up all day. Since placing that order triggered the standing sell order to fill, I would think that meant my order was first in line. But instead, some other order filled first, and mine still sits there waiting.
How is this explained by technical difficulties?
I see no other orders for 620 Satoshi and haven't for hours. As far as I know, my order is the only one, and if there were invisible orders, mine had to be first. And yet, it wasn't the first to fill when someone else sold more than the amount I'd ordered at that price.
I feel like I'm playing by a set of rules I do not understand. Is anyone else trading on Mercatox? Could you share some insight?
How is this explained by technical difficulties?Depends how orders are filled. If you don't specify in which order orders are filled, they could fill in any order or default to newest to oldest. However I'm not arguing your issues are technical, the only ones who would truly know is mercatox. I do not see how an exchange would benefit from doing this intentionally either. I am just offering an alternative explanation that may not be so nefarious. I would recommend opening a support ticket to explain your experiences. This link seems to be working. https://support.mercatox.com/Thanks for the insight, and I'm really not trying to be a party pooper. Just observed some strange (to me) exchange behavior, and I will choose to take the view that these are unintentional technical things. I hear what you were saying earlier about it taking a lot "under the hood" to make an exchange truly work properly especially when lots of people are using it at the same time. I'm really looking forward to the DNotes Global exchange  There was a very brief flash crash before the price just went up by another 100 Satoshi, so in the end I got those orders filled and I'm already in profit. Thanks for the link to support--it works. I will open up a ticket if I have any more trouble. Mercatox is shady. No bad experiences with them myself as I have avoided them based on the experiences of others but mercatox has a long history of shady practices that are well documented especially when the price of XRB (now Nano) climbed exponentially in December. People had their coins locked up for months on there. I would not be surprised at all if what you are noticing is very real. I would also advise not using mercatox moving forward. |
|
|
|
|
I'm personally not convinced masternodes are the way to go, but I trust in the TWIST team at this point so whatever decision they make I support.
|
|
|
|
|
Reading through, I was unaware of the retweet requirement. That may be why I was placed as not active. I am happy to hear clarification that there are no strict post requirements.
|
|
|
|
|
Just wanted to point out that the discussion on discord a week back or so was that as far as eligibility for the airdrop, there wouldn't be an imposed threshold regarding activity so as not to promote spamming... yet, despite being active on both discord and btc talk my account was moved from active to not active. Just find that fairly disappointing and in direct contradiction to what was stated on discord. IMO, if there are to be threshold levels they should be made public. They also should be low so I don't need to listen to people on discord talk about what they are making for dinner and inane chatter such as that. Focus should be on productive conversation on the discord, no just conversation. Extremely disappointing to see that.
|
|
|
|
What has happened to TWIST, the price of TWIST has increased a lot in recent weeks, TWIST's price has been around 50 Satoshis in the previous few months, but recently it has quickly doubled.
TWIST's price is quite volatile due to the scarce volumes. It has surged quite a lot due to the cryptopia listing and now it has been retreating as some airdrop recipients has likely dumped their coins. But this all doesn't really matter, people dumping are just decentralizing the coin more and more, so in the long term that's all very good for Twist, since the project is super-cool, the roadmap is cool and the team is serious. Exactly. Most people should have had the opportunity to dump at this point. Meanwhile team continues to churn at a steady pace. Should see slow but steady price increase that will really explode when we finally exit this bear market |
|
|
|
|
Here to stay this time hopefully
|
|
|
|
|
Think a fresh start with new name is a good idea. Honestly, though I know it was stated the logo was likely to stay the same I would strongly reconsider that and use the opportunity to make a new logo. This is likely the final iteration so might as well capitalize with a new logo that jives well with the new name.
|
|
|
|
|
Cryptopia listing is huge, it's a well established exchange and it's reassuring not to be all in on one exchange.
Whoever said Binance, come on. That's not appropriate at this time at all. The Twist team thus far has been doing everything the textbook right way as far as I am concerned.
|
|
|
|
|
Merit system was a good idea in theory, terrible in practice. It's near impossible to rank up and I've lurked all over the forums here and high quality conversation is a rarity, let alone the opportunity to meaningfully participate in one. I think a lot of the older forum members are delusional when they say oh "participate in higher quality threads." This forum has very little of that. The merit system may have been implemented to help curb that, but it hasn't done the trick. It needs a serious revision.
|
|
|
|
|
