Show Posts
|
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 [5]
|
traded 50 pxl with zxm7001
I sent btc first, got pxl back in minutes. good seller.
|
|
|
Big Question:
What happens with those coins spent on the pxl wall?
|
|
|
bjornw, thank your for your original work! It helps me to get a whole picture of the historical liquidity rates very well.
There are a few things you might consider to improve:
1. the FRR order is missing from your order book 2. add zoom in to the liquidity demands/offers graph (does highcharts support it?) 3. currently I see two liquidity offers order book where one of them should be liquidity demands.
again, a great job.
|
|
|
Adding an "Interest Paid" column for each loan closed, would help for accountability. And having those details reflect in History as "Closed Offers".
We should have a loans history, to be able to check how much time each of them did last, how much interest each of them generated, etc. +1
|
|
|
Everybody loves free dollars!
rwfRURp1L9RKbJG9yW2QpCg7GwCb9iMXxQ
|
|
|
I would like to see Ripple to be listed as:
Ripple XRP
|
|
|
In the UK you can get a chinese currency bank account with Bank of China (there are 4 branches here, 1 an hour from where I live). But I'm uncertain if you could withdraw from BTC China (directly or via tenpay) to it. Is this possible in the USA?
Failing that, if you could just uproot, quit your job and live anywhere for a year to arb bitcoin would Beijing be THE optimal place to do it? The biggest arbs seem to be between BTC-e and BtcChina, is it easy to fund BTC-e from China?
Sadly you can't. CNY can not be sent outside of China via any bank/payment system. It's forbidden by law.
|
|
|
Many Chinese are doing this for days.
Current best arbitrage strategy is to buy from mtgox/bitstamp/btc-e and sell on any Chinese exchange.
The profit is somewhere between 5-40% for the past week depending on your cost to move money.
I did it once with my Janpan friend through Mt.Gox two days ago with 60 BTC, and both of us made a solid 8,000 USD in a commercial break time.
The spread is much narrower now, but still very profitable.
If you can move money quickly into bitstamp/btc-e, you can do this too but a trustworthy Chinese partner is needed.
|
|
|
All these Chinese exchanges with 0% fee. The result... A game to shake people down.
Running a BTC exchange is a risky business. So are BTCChina et al a charity? Heck no, they're likely all making lots of money -- the future of BTC be damned.
I hope investors can see the huge information asymmetry with big players they have in this giant game of chicken. The only winners can be the biggest holders already.
With 0% fee, exchanges can only operate fairly if they publish more data --- e.g. Volume per user. Without this, you may as well be playing Russian Roulette.
This should be abundantly clear today. The question is, where do we go from here? Because this is not sustainable at all. Smaller players will lose all.
Agree. It is so easy to fix prices and fake volumes in a 0% commission market. This rally has a lot to do with the trend that most major Chinese exchanges switched to 0% commission mode to start a price war.
|
|
|
As Gavin Andresen wrote today posted in Core Development Update #5 https://bitcoinfoundation.org/blog/?p=290Smarter transaction fees
Today, transaction fees are hard-coded into the Bitcoin-Qt/bitcoind wallet software, and the rules surrounding those fees are a collection of heuristics that evolved over the last four years. In short, the current fee-handling code is a complicated mess that will stop working as soon as transaction volume doubles a couple of more times.
In theory, it should be simple: transaction fees should to be set by a give-and-take between the people creating transactions (who want to pay as little as possible) and the people validating and storing the transactions (miners, who would like to be rewarded with higher fees).
And the code that miners are using today to select transactions is simple: they fill their blocks with the highest fee-per-kilobyte transaction (and highest priority transactions, if they choose to set aside some space in their blocks for free transactions).
I’ve been working on teaching the wallet code to estimate how low a fee (or priority) a transaction needs, at the moment it is sent, to be accepted by miners and included in the next block or three. The estimates are based on watching transactions as they are broadcast on the network and keeping track of which of those transactions are accepted into blocks.
The danger with estimating transaction fees is miners have an incentive to try to game the estimate to make transaction fees higher. For example, if the estimate was based on the average transaction fee for all transactions in the last N blocks, miners could add very-high-fee pay-to-self transactions to the blocks that they mine to drive up the average. However, by only considering fees for transactions that have been broadcast on the network that threat is eliminated– miners could broadcast very-high-fee pay-to-self transactions, but would end up paying those high transaction fees to other miners. The transaction estimation code also uses median transaction fees, not averages, to make it much harder for a minority of transactions to influence transaction fees.
If most of the miners got together and agreed to all broadcast lots of high transaction fee transactions they could succeed in driving up the average transaction fee… but that isn’t going to happen because it would be easy for miners to “free ride” by breaking the agreement and just collecting the higher transaction fees for themselves.
All of the above will work well for fully-validating software like Bitcoin-Qt/bitcoind. More thinking is needed to figure out how lightweight simplified payment verification software (like Multibit) can better estimate transaction fees, because today they can’t calculate how much transaction fee each transaction is paying.
What do you guys think of this approach?
|
|
|
they have an ICP
If you look carefully, you'll see what BTCChina has is "ICP Bei (备)", not "ICP Zheng (证)". ICP Bei is compulsory for all non-commercial websites run by Chinese individual/company, ICP Zheng is for commercial websites. Technically, it is illegal for BTCChina to make a profit. The government has every reason to shut it down at their will, although I believe it is unlikely to happen any time soon.
|
|
|
BTCchina is licensed by the Government of China. People who know about doing business in China will know what I am talking about.
What are you talking about? There is no license even remotely related to bitcoin exchange in China. There is no forex business outside of banking system. BTCChina is not licensed other than the regular business license.
|
|
|
Domestic JPY seems okay.
Currently it takes about a week if you live in Japanese and have a Janpanese bank account.
|
|
|
看样子核心竞争力在于反欺诈能力。当年TradeHill就是被chargeback搞死的。
问题是Google Wallet禁止了涉及BTC的交易怎么办?
|
|
|
补充几点:
1、Mt.Gox不是完全不能提现,最近有很少数人收到了提现款,主要是SEPA提现用户。申请提现的时间在6-7月份。
2、大额用户可以加付5%手续费给Mt.Gox,要求优先人工处理提现。
|
|
|
希望有慈善机构直接接受BTC捐赠。用BTC捐款的好处是非常透明,这点尤其重要。
|
|
|
|