|
very good points...but the ico space is still cluttered with a lot of insincere projects, hopefully the weak teams will be phased out by next year...
|
|
|
|
|
the problem is that even if the platform is working, the number of actual users are actually quite dismal... real world user adoption is a tough prob to crack...
|
|
|
|
|
i agree, regret not holding a larger percentage of my portfolio in fiat... was way too bullish when fundamentals were out of whack... fiat is ur gunpowder when the markets tanks without good reason...
|
|
|
|
|
no one can guarantee that...it's a tough market now, u have to do ur own due diligence, but platform coins have a better chance in the long run...
|
|
|
|
|
i diversify my holdings and hope that one or two of the projects take off...but try and ensure that the projects u're interested in/hodling are worth it in the first place..i.e., solid teams with good progress, strong concept.
|
|
|
|
|
u can't, it's just a platform/dashboard that enables u to interact with ur eth wallet...u can improve the security of access via using hardware token or metamask to access it
|
|
|
|
|
yups, greed is an everlasting evil. there will always be greedy folks ard, investors or participants in the crypto markets have to be more discerning...
|
|
|
|
|
too much noise or excessive hype...efforts could be better channeled to working on platforms/service and slowly gaining real users...
|
|
|
|
|
depends on how u selected those, if u didn't do any research on those projects before joining, rewards might be quite minimal to be honest...esp in this bear mkt
|
|
|
|
|
it might be hard day trading if u're not a veteran trader who knows what/when to look at in this mkt...
|
|
|
|
|
in the end it will depend on whether the real constraints of the eth system (scaling, cost, efficiency) can be resolved in a way that it can actually penetrate real world mkts...
|
|
|
|
|
if u look at the stats, new icos are still coming in at a steady pace, but it's a congested space...new solid teams and concepts are few and far between
|
|
|
|
|
i think utility token is better for the blockchain ecosystem as a whole in terms of real-world adaptation. securities tokens are not truly essential in the sense that shares/equity have been around for ages and the system has proven to be sufficiently robust.
|
|
|
|
|
a lot of bounty rewards are greatly reduced now, not really worth the time. blockchain as a tech as a good future, but it will take time to reach its potential...
|
|
|
|
|
litecoin hasn't proved itself much in terms of adoption. some catalyst event will need to take place for that to really happen.
|
|
|
|
|
too simplistic. the market will be a lot more challenging going forward. a few solid projects will rise and create real value by influencing real-world markets and industries. most will fail.
|
|
|
|
|
bounty hunters' average earnings have dropped drastically in recent months. think most campaigns are no longer worth it. maybe be more selective when u pick any to join. crypto trading is a challenging profession, only the best can be consistently profitable. if u're an amateur, u might lose ur funds instead.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
