The admin login page is vulnerable to SQL injection.


This line is vulnerable to SQL injection if an attacker sends a custom user agent.

---

Edit: This is a recurring issue through out the script. Frequently the script records the user-agent without sanitizing it first.

Just found out this exchange is no longer up /: I had Tigercoins (TGC) on it. So that sucks.

Hello, fellow bitcoin folk. I had an idea which I've been searching for.

Recently I've come across a need for a interesting pool setup. The pool would mine crypto-currencies on the quark algorithm using profit switching (between qrk, fz, cnote, src, etc.) and then auto exchange to btc. It would then cash out to a specified BTC address when the mined amount meets a certain threshold.

The reason I want to mine on the quark algorithm and then exchange to btc is very simple. I have a website and I would like users, who don't have special ASICs or superb gpu's, to be able to mine btc to an address created for them and then when this btc accumulates to a specified amount, they can exchange the btc on the address for my products. I can handle everything except the pool.

If a pool like this were to be established, it could be highly profitable for not only me, but any other business which wants to give users the ability to donate their processor power in exchange for free product.

In effect, it would be similar to a site like www.CleverMining.com, but based around the quark algorithm rather than scrypt.

If something like this exists for the quark algorithm, I would love to find out. If not, does anyone else have an interest in something like this?

Thanks,
LilGhost

with this statement you are establishing regulations. You may not mean it intentionally, but you're calling for no regulations and then contradicting your original petition by saying this should be a rule. While I do agree that regulations should be toned down, I just wanted to point out this issue that I noticed.

Hello. I run a small software development business. I was wondering if let's say 30 computers mining at roughly 10MH/s each to the same worker would be at all useful? I ask because my applications that I sell/distribute are made to be used for extended periods of time. So if a user is running my software and my software automatically runs CGMiner on their system (yes, I would get their approval first via the TOS), would it actually produce anything?


------
Edit:
Would I be better to use LTC?

Open the wallet in a virtual machine + a sandbox in that VM (can't be too safe) while running a vpn, check to see if it really has ~51 BTC. If it does take out a 15% fee for the transfer and send him 85% of the funds on the wallet. Nothing to lose, he gets ~43.35 BTC and you get ~7.65 BTC for conducting the transfer. Win-win and your morals don't feel destroyed.

"15%OFFURY" was about to order 1, but seems like the coupon code is invalid now.

I had no problem loading some into my cart.

Hey, I was wondering if amagi metals is down for anyone else? This has been on going for days. I open the main page with no problems, then I try to open another page and suddenly that page never loads.

I doubt the FBI will sell them back because they're evidence.

mine asc coin over on coinex

Agreed. Where are you mining it on? I'm mining on Coinex.

I'm currently running 12 ASICMiner block erupters on 2 hubs.

Buy an old computer case, hook up a bunch of block erupters onto usb hubs you've mounted in the case that are powered off the pc power unit, load in usb fans, mine inconspicuously.

Thank you very much.

Hi, I've done some digging on google but haven't come to a sure answer. Is it possible to daisy chain the RHB-500 (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B004F38WT4/ref=ox_sc_act_title_2?ie=UTF8&psc=1&smid=ATVPDKIKX0DER)? I currently run 6 miners and a fan (limit of 7 miners and a fan, but I'm playing it safe and only running 6). I'm looking to add a few more miners and was wanting to know if daisy chaining these usb hubs was possible? Thanks in advance.

Popularity goes up, difficulty goes up, average bitcoin per user goes down, price per bitcoin goes up. Thus the small reward even my hobby 4 GH/s rig pulls currently will be valuable as soon as the difficulty has been up for a couple of months. Some basic economics.

I see it as being a good thing. The silk road was casting a bad light on those of us who mine/trade/use bitcoins and do not have any interest in using services like the silk road or performing/purchasing illicit activities/items with bitcoins. Because of this, I view the silk road being closed as a good thing.

My thoughts exactly.

What makes you think that?

I would be interested, but I would like the OP to give a little more clarity as to his idea as bitcoins are a virtual currency not physical. Are we saying users would have a card and they'd be able to slide the card and based on the current exchange rate transfer X amount of bitcoins to a bitcoin account and then withdraw USD. If so, i'm interested, but currently the US government is going against bitcoin and thus these would probably lead to expensive lawsuits which I am not interested in.