Bitcoin Forum
April 25, 2024, 12:12:42 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 »
61  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: I'm Kevin, here's my side. on: June 21, 2011, 02:26:19 PM
If a bank is robbed and the robber simply transfers money to other peoples accounts, what do you think the bank would do?  They're not going to let people keep the ill-gotten monies.

You buy exotic fruits. Later you found out you got them for 1 cent but they cost 10 dollars a day before. Later it turns out it was becasuse the baazar owner left doors unlocked and some people rearranged price tags.

Now YOU are called the thief.
And the guys that bought apples for 3 or 10 USD are also - well perhaps not called thiefs - but they are not getting the apples they dealed and payed for (well they will have their money returned, but they would prefer the deal to be carried out and shop owner is not reimbursing this).



62  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Someone hacking mybitcoin.com accounts: Proof on: June 21, 2011, 01:49:27 PM
Wow. And they offer no help... Don't use MBC guys! This is how it started with MtGox! I think MBC is either getting pwned, or they're stealing btc... What can I do with this guys address? Can I trace, or at least get an IP? Boycott!

Sure would be nice to have some signed receipts for all such stuff.
Like Fellow Traveler's Open Transactions system for example, or just openpgp or something.
63  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Mt.Gox and void trades: Force Majeure on: June 21, 2011, 01:45:05 PM
Just read the ToS of Tibanne, which you (as it seems?!) agreed to when opening an account on MtGox:
http://legal.tibanne.com/

I never read that and was not directed to read it during the registration process, so I cannot be said to have agreed with that.  Normal websites do have a 'I have read the ToS' checkbox at least.

No-one cares if you read it; but indeed there should be an  [ ] I have read and agree to ToS   checkbox.  Probably it depends on jurisdiction. Actually, which one counts here, JP or where the user lives or.... ?
64  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: MTGox Is Gone Forever.... ? on: June 21, 2011, 01:07:25 PM
iŽd go for http://tradehill.com seems like most professional exchange atm

tradehill.com seems like most professional SPAMMING exchange atm
65  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: I'm Kevin, here's my side. on: June 21, 2011, 12:59:29 PM
Robber steals from a bank.
Robber loses his loot on a chase.
You pick up loot.
+2

Fallacy.

It is really more of:
Owner of Art's dealing auction house gets drunk and forgets to lock up doors. Few times. (Or he gives they keys to his friend and he gets drunk). Either way he was warned for weeks to get the damn doors fixed.

Then someone brakes in, and rearranges price tags.

Then you come in and seeing paintings at affordable 13 USD instead usual 17 USD you bid for it and win.
Others do too, some even for 10 USD, 5 USD... and so on.
One dude buys all the paintings for a penny each - you think - what a crazy trade, wtf.

You come back to pickup your painting for 13 USD that you bought, but the owner woken up and closed the auction house.
Sign says it will reopen in few hours. Then in a day. Then "soon".

As buyer of picture at 13 USD I would expect some compensation if it was all a fuckup.

I, personally, would not demand to have the paintings are pries like 10 USD, or 5 USD, or 1 USD,  but some people might want to want to have compensation.


66  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: To Magical Tux on: June 21, 2011, 12:44:15 PM
MagicalTux,
As a bitcoin member that has dealt with you before, I want to say that over time you have built up my trust.

Well I can say that services from mtgox where good as far as I know (but this leak clusterfuck is horrible shit).

Obviously they need people that take take security as their life mission and are paranoid, not the "some hacks? well meh its probably the user fault" approach that was allegedly used.
67  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Mt.Gox and void trades: Force Majeure on: June 21, 2011, 12:32:36 PM
sure, i could be wrong but i see these as all logical deductions based on his behavior, the facts, and how he is conducting himself.

If you really see it, then address that, instead of doing childish insults.
68  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: The Flamers Are Back! on: June 21, 2011, 12:25:34 PM
Mtgox leaked our sensitive data.
They didn't leak your data. It was stolen.
your language is important.  i think the difference is obvious; leak implies intentional, stolen is involuntary.

redirected from Data Leak:
  Data breach      
  From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  A data breach is the unintentional release of secure information to an untrusted environment. Other terms for this phenonmenon include unintentional information disclosure, data leak and also data spill.
  Incidents range from concerted attack by black hats with the backing of organized crime or national governments to careless disposal of used computer equipment or data storage media.


I ment the same as Wikipedia defines it - Mtgox unintentionally released our secure information.


69  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: The Flamers Are Back! on: June 21, 2011, 12:01:11 PM
Mtgox leaked our sensitive data.
They didn't leak your data. It was stolen.
Are you really that retarded that you don't understand the difference?

Ok... so by comparsion, was Sony banking cards scandal a leak or "just data stolen" from poor poor Sony?

Even Reuters calls Sony heist "data leak", and the situation seem similar - someone hacked in and stolen the database - but perhaps they don't know shit, or perhaps this situation is totally different.

So sure - please explain to us this difference - why you say mtgox users database getting into Internet was not a data leak. perhaps I'm wrong.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/04/28/us-sony-stock-idUSTRE73R0A420110428
70  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: The Flamers Are Back! on: June 21, 2011, 11:54:25 AM
they are here to pummel mtgox the best they can.  look at all the newbie posters who have registered in just the last few days spreading FUD.

Mtgox leaked our sensitive data.

This is not a FUD, thoes are the solid, sad facts - you can find all our data leaked here on forum.

We know user DB leaked and passwords where cracked and more are cracked.

Some people used same passwords in few places and they are burned even more (but this is actually in big part their fault, smaller fault of mtgox imho).

I wonder now is transactions also leaked.
If they could log into accounts, they could see orders history. Including banking details.

IRS visit, anyone? Been paying all the taxes on bitcoin gains?
Anyone bought coins in mtgox and right away bought a sex-doll, or alcohol (in countries where that is not legal), or donated to pro-democratic foundations (say EFF?) in countries where that would bring trouble?

It is the worst banking secrecy disaster that could had happened to Mt gox users - full access to their accounts.

Personally actually I did paid tax on bitcoin (yeap), but this situation is really bad even if this part does not affect me.

Sorry mtgox, I did liked your services a lot;  but such horrible negligence pisses me off! 

71  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Mt.Gox and void trades: Force Majeure on: June 21, 2011, 11:42:10 AM
who is pathetic?  u register 2d ago AFTER all the events happen, give yourself a nick like that, and scream bloody murder against MT and mtgox and then call me a conspiranoid?
you had no money on the line in bitcoin, you have no interest in bitcoin (other than seeing it fail), you have no interest in mtgox, you have no interest in being a gentleman, you should leave.

1) you are pathetic (at least in this posts above) - for the reasons that follow:
2) you made ad ad hominem attack - actually it was all that your post was
3) you imply that person must be stupid because he just joined our community. This is a fallacy. How you know how long he used BTC overall (even if that mattered) - or better, how knowledgeable he is in business/finances/trading/law?
If Benjamin Franklin would join some local group of people talking about a politics, would you also imply he doesn't know shit, just because he just-joined?
4) "you had no money on the line in bitcoin" - how the hell do you know that?
5) you say that if he has no money on the line then he should not speak. Then what, if soliders would be murdering people in country X then you should not say anything bad (or good) about it unless you have family in country X?

Seriously.


EDITED:
Quote from: cypherdoc
The ad hominem is normally described as a logical fallacy,[2] but it is not always fallacious; in some instances, questions of personal conduct, character, motives, etc., are legitimate and relevant to the issue.
Sure but his motives are not relevant to his opinion how law would work here. Just the law matters no matter who quotes it.
72  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Mt.Gox and void trades: Force Majeure on: June 21, 2011, 11:35:19 AM
What damage ? When the exchange reopens you will find your $ and BTC balances untouched. The most you could claim is that you were denied service for a few days.

What with orders @10 @12 @15 placed at least partially (imho mostly) by legitimate users.
73  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Mt.Gox and void trades: Force Majeure on: June 21, 2011, 11:33:34 AM
For Force Majeure requires three conditions:
[...]
hey jerk; go back to where u came from 2d ago!

Your ad hominem attack is proving that even a new member of forum can say more correct and informative things that "hero member" as you.
74  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: I'm Kevin, here's my side. on: June 21, 2011, 11:26:20 AM
Let's say we let Kevin keep all of those 200K+ coins,
then mtgox "accidentally" gets hacked again,
and this time that single hacked account happen to be Kevin's
(the hack happened so fast before Kevin could withdraw anything)

What would Kevin say? Rollback or not?

This is again, why reimbursing everyone (so doing a rollback while letting people profit as if there would be no-rollback) would be most just (and unrealistic since it requires liek 400,000 usd)
75  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: [Full Disclosure] More likely MtGox Post-Mortem on: June 21, 2011, 10:38:38 AM

Mediafire seems to require JavaScript turned on to download the fucking text file.

Someone should paste that to normal pastebin instead of this crap
76  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: I'm Kevin, here's my side. on: June 21, 2011, 10:20:21 AM
I can't believe the greed dripping off my screen. You know it would be fair to roll back, but boy, being a millionaire does sound good. Whatever Mt. Gox' history, this is not right.

What if people in china would rob some farmers. The farmers would be forced to work at slave wage or just for food at local factory. It would make new abibas boots from there cost x100 lower then you pay in normal shop. Someone would import them to your country, and you would buy them at x5 lower price at local baazar and then open up a shop.

No wait, not baazar.

You would buy it at most respectable and biggest imported good distributor in your Bitcoinville country.

Later police comes in and takes all your goods. Happy?

Again - I am not saying here necessarily that say mtgox is bad for doing the rollback or anything; Just trying to look at legal-moral problems that arise with trades triggered initially by some wrong doing; How should they reverse, who should refund which trader.

77  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: I'm Kevin, here's my side. on: June 21, 2011, 10:11:43 AM
Short: lots of people not wanting to deal with "probably stolen" bitcoins, selling them, making the bitcoin's value drop, and so on. Then, 250 000 bitcoins robbed:
- will be worth nothing if nobody want to pay for them
- still is illegal

And if the crash would be "just" to @5 then what? Is it some hacking or bubble bursting?
What if @3 ?

Here it happened, first it was drop to @10, then @5 then to @1 and so on.

There are more people involved then the @0.01 guy.

I would buy like hell if the price would drop to say @9, and most people on this forum would. With price @1 I doubt anyone would not buy (unless he started to think the entire bitcoin thing collapsed overall).
78  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: A suspect mail from "zendesk@mtgox.com" on: June 21, 2011, 10:07:28 AM
I deposited a small sum of Euro and it took 4 days to clear, so I contacted mtgox. They sent an e-mail after a day or so confirming that the funds were deposited, and I had them during the "crash". Today I received following e-mail, which I doubt comes from mtgox. As I am a hack illiterate I post it here as it shows the hackers have, if the e-mail is not from mtgox, access to mtgox e-mail account. But maybe this is known by everyone but me, in which case I appologise for my newb question.


MtGox.com Team
[/quote]

It would be cool if email's would be openpgp signed (separate key ofcourse for automated notifications etc, other for real humans/support)
79  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: [POLL] Roll it Back or Not? on: June 21, 2011, 10:05:18 AM
Rollback. 
In ideal world I would also add "and refund people loosing profits due to rollback".
80  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: MtGox flash-crash rollback - Requesting full disclosure or referal to SEC/JSDA on: June 21, 2011, 10:03:48 AM
considering all the info, the 500k BTC probably never existed but where created by SQL injection.
so there is no main beneficiary.

Never existed in what sense? There are blocks carrying 400 k transaction around - although it is just mtgox backing up its wallets AFAIK,
and the fortune gained due to hack leading to 0.01 price was contained inside mtgox database of balances of internal accounts.
Pages: « 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!