 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1]
|
|
For the moment i can withdraw everyday, i hope it will last one month more at least to let me time to take back my capital
|
|
|
|
@Slow death, yes, normally i can withdraw tonight the 3% everyday, so i will not wait to have the capital now i know its a scam @stompix Thank you, the patent is a golf club, i am so stupid, i should have checked this If they are the golf club i suppose i am the golf ball  |
|
|
|
I involved no one  Too much paranoia, i am just a normal guy who thought he found a good plan... nothing else  That is not "a good" plan, that is "too good to be true" plan, there is a huge difference between them. And I don't believe in normal guys who registered two years ago and still can't recognize a ponzi scheme. You pretend to be a naive newbie, but that doesn't give you a right to promote very likely scams without consequences even if you invested in them yourself. You continue your paranoia, i came here to share and have insights, nothing more nothing less |
|
|
|
There is something in what you say, I suppose. This account has a huge gaps between posts, he woke up just for the purpose to post his referral link.
I would never trust such behavior, especially if promotion is done by newbie account with 7 posts.
If you or corrupt journalists you mentioned have involved enough people into that scheme, trustcapital.ltd will still be alive after month and you might get back your investments. For your referrals, it is going to be difficult to withdraw anything.
I involved no one Too much paranoia, i am just a normal guy who thought he found a good plan... nothing else |
|
|
|
I read every article and in a way they (trustcapital.ltd) have a lot of information, but take into account that the freelance writer Leah Hutton was unable to enter the trustcapital.ltd office according to Leah Hutton she verified that the algorithm patent is real, but for her to verify that she had to do it at the UK Intellectual Property Office that was open My question: The UK Intellectual Property Office was open, but the trustcapital.ltd office that I think has few employees is closed? something is not right here Here are the big points that Leah Hutton didn't check: 1 - who are the oxford scientists who created this algorithm in 2000? 2 - where is this proof of the algorithm in action? and this: The unique RJV12 algorithm allows our company to predict the behavior of financial assets with a probability of 97.6% and consistently pay dividends to our partners! if someone has that then they don't need other people's money. think, it would not be easier for them to make a loan at the bank and with this algorithm they would be millionaires, they would not need other people's money In the article its written the office is closed because of the virus, she asked the security guy The guy behind the algo seems to really existing, Caleb Hill, his name is in the patent And the need of this kind of website its the leverage, if you have an algo that does 6% by day, you give 3% and you keep the rest, it will be more rewardful by 100000000x than an loan with interest Anyway now i am in i will keep you posted on what's going on in the futur |
|
|
|
|
OK ok, thank you for your insights, its a cartel, scammers journalists and youtube together ok i got it
I cant take back all the capital its blocked, all i can do its get my 3% by day until all the thing blows up, hopefully i put only 1k, at end of the month i get back the capital at least
Thank you for your advises
Cheers
|
|
|
|
Here are my reasons how can I said you're not asking but promoting this scam website : I could be wrong too, let's wait other members comment and share his thought I did both, i did promotion and i warned that maybe its a scam and if it was a scam one of you was going to tell it, that's my "ask" I created in the bitcoin section because i thought it was the best place as its part of the ecosystem bitcoin as its described in the title section, i didnt see the scam part I clearly warned that may be a scam but if not, yes why not use my link ? It may work. Except if in the forum's rules its forbidden to promote referal link 1) Official registration 2) Check out the address 3) Unique patented RJV12 algorithm 4) Guaranteed income 5) Checked ourselves. SourcePoint number 1,2, and 3 check this thread Certificate of Incorporation- what it is and why it shouldn't be trusted!. There is so many project has manipulated and using fake address, registration, companies house, or license. Point number 4 and 5, how can you trust his said? What if the journalism is the scammer from that's project? Have you verify it? What i checked its the articles that the journalist published and they are many and very old comparing to the TRUST CAPITAL LTD's creation date I dont think that the journalist and the project are linked you can verify it by clicking on the journalit's name https://tokenhell.com/author/leah-hutton/page/8/ |
|
|
|
HI there Dont put me in it, if its a scam i am going to be scammed also, i put 1000$ in their deposit I came here to share the website and have your thoughts on it, not to be treated as a scammer.... so unflag please I discovered it on Youtube in this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e4fMDMBT3moAs you can see everybody is talking about it in the comments Its seems that they developped an algo that do the works RJV12 algorithm The company is registered, there is a patent, and journalists did the test in this article https://tokenhell.com/trust-capital/The journalists say its OK, that's what pushed me to test also |
|
|
|
|
Thank you for your reply
Both actually, the story explains why we need to start this project
Sorry for my bad english its not my first langage that's why maybe its not clear enough
I would love to create this project but i need the team first and i told myself that this forum is the best place to start, discuss first about the feasibility, create the team and launch the ICO
I can tell you that the end of crypto nonsense of nowadays will start like this, two tokens, GDT for gold and SVT for silver
When these two tokens will be in place and linked to a real bank account backed by real gold and silver all others cryptos and fiats will go to zero, even the BTC and the dollar
Because the only one real money is gold and silver, fiat currency is not real money, neither bitcoin is
Bitcoin will go to zero one day its sure, or because of a new bitcoin better or because of almost free energy. How will you be able to speak about store of value after that ?? You dont have this problem with gold, gold is 100% sure, nothing better than gold will come out soon be sure of that, it didnt happen since 5000 years...
Dollar and other fiats will go to zero because of the printing money monopoly as it was always be the case since human exists, you just have to look at the money history to see that any fiat doesnt stay more than 200 years before self destruction by inflation and debts
We dont have this issue with gold and silver, gold and silver are the only one real stable coin and the only one real store of value because you cant print them
Gold was here before human and will stay after human
Do you understand now why gold and silver are the only way out for prosperity and peace ?
But only crypto can make it real because no one wants to have gold and silver coins in his pocket, its not convenient but a token solves the issue
It's time to thank BTC for its technology and to use it for real now and for this we need to link blockchain with gold and bank
|
|
|
|
All stable coins will be banned this year : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=951_newJ29gIts funny because two days ago i told here in my first post that they were a scam, not bigger scam than dollar or euro be reassured  The only one crypto that should be existing is the one i described, all others are useless, who cares about smart contract except companies ? And never someone with a brain will put all his difficult days of work in some lines of code because that's what it is the crypto world... Unstable so not trustful Only gold can save us and that's why they did bretton woods, to take from us the only real thing that could make us rich thanks to our work Bretton woods made us all slaves but the crypto can bring back the gold standard The first thing i want as a citizen its to have my savings in a safe heaven and stopped being stolen by the inflation and stopped seeing the government do shit with our currency Only gold can do this Why nobody is answering ? Am i in the wrong part of the forum to talk about new project ? Yes my project is not a coin that will do 1000 x but in the other hand my crypto will save the world and the system Nobody is interrested by building a team and create the GDT ? To kill the system we need to enter in it, like the Trojan horse that's why we need to create a bank first before imploding the system of their fake currency from the inside |
|
|
|
Dear all, I hope you are all fine I will begin to present myself, give my opinion on the crypto today and then explain why i bring you GDT, the Gold Token I am 38 years old and i work in computer science, i am a developper since 13 years Maybe i am all wrong because i am not a crypto expert and that's why i open this topic, its to have your point of view on the project If i am wrong nothing will happen, i will just be educated by you, but if i am right this crypto will be the one and all banks will go bankrupt soon for the sake of humanity So the global idea is to bring back Bretton Woods thanks to the crypto, i will explain how below I discussed a lot with my brother who is a financial mathematician about crypto and he told me that Bitcoin will not make it for multiple raisons, neither others crypto and here is why Bitcoin is deflationary, as the circulating supply is blocked you will never be able to use it in the real world because the prices will always move. No retailers can work with a currency which has this kind of fluctuation. And as the circulating supply is blocked the BTC's price will never stopped to rise and you will prefer keep your bitcoin hopping a higher price tomorow instead of spending them today and the effect of this is that the sales will plummet as everybody is just watching the price going higher and higher and not buying anything with it, if Bitcoin is only used its the end of the economy, that's why we saw stable coin coming in, but the stable coin are a scam as they are backed by fiat scam monopoly currency Let's be clear here, i own myslef bitcoin and i see bitcoin as the most revolutionary thing after internet but as a financial assets bitcoin will stay as it is, a strange asset of store of value which carries the risk to go back to zero one day, especially if energy becomes almost free thanks to the nuclear fusion for example because the price of a BTC is 70% cost of energy so if energy drops BTC will drop with it https://coinsavage.com/content/2019/12/bitcoins-production-cost/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vPS-epGPJmgSo now, what is the only one real money in the world ? Its gold, nothing else, all others things are debt, but gold has a problem, its heavy, so lets tokenise it to make it liquid https://monetary-metals.com/why-did-jp-morgan-say-money-is-gold-nothing-else/JP Morgan say “Money is gold, nothing else”? “Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value -- zero.”~ Voltaire I invit you to watch this documentary of Mike Maloney, Money vs Currency - Hidden Secrets Of Money, to understand difference between real money and currency https://www.youtube.com/user/whygoldandsilverIf fiat currency was unlinked from gold ( Bretton Woods ) its to give them the possibility to print fiat like monopoly for wars especially and in the same time make us all poor because of the inflation, its why the houses worth 300K, inflation is a hidden tax that makes you a slave poor, you work and they take your wealth through inflation When you put 100 000$ in a normal bank account with a rate of 3% inflation by year, you lose 30% of purchasing power in 10 years that's why all currencies are for slaves and that the only real money is gold because gold protects you against inflation so after 10 years with gold you are 30% richer with no risk to go back to zero The role of gold is to protect you against inflation, against fiat currency and therefore its the only one real money and the only one real store of value, a real store of value dont do -50% in some months as the BTC does it... The only way to get out of the slavery its to have a crypto backed by gold that we can spend I checked if this idea was already done by the commnunity and i saw a lot of problem, or the token is not yours, or you cant ask for the gold regarding the token you have And the most important thing you cant spend them, no credit card or app to do so ! So finally there is no real project crypto with gold really working in the real world today from what i saw Here is my idea 1 - Create a real bank to get access to Swift and the payments terminals arround the world 2 - Create an exchange to have zero fees 3 - Each time someone put dollars in his bank account the bank automatically buy gold with the money and securise it in a vault which will be audited 4- The bank tokenizes the amount of the gold in GDT and put it in the crypto adress of the user at rate 1 GDT = 1 g of gold 5 - When the user spend GDT with their phone or credit card the bank sells the GDT against dollars thanks to its exchange and makes the payment 6 - The person who bought GDT against dollar on the exchange has now real gold and can come ask for it at the bank or spend them Conclusion, everybody is now backed by gold and can spend them and all that could be only possible thanks to crypto All banks will close because everybody will open an account in our bank gold crypto because it will be the only bank who makes you really richier with time, you just have to look at the gold charts, if this was already existing we should have triple our savings in the last 10 years, lets dont miss the next 10 years https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fichier:Gold_price_in_USD.pngI had the idea and when i proposed it to my brother he tolds me that he will be my first client so i really have faith in this project I dont know if what i said is technically possible but if it is its the real solution And it will be decentralised, the nodes will take care of the transactions and the accounts For me this project is totally valid as i saw credit card which gives you the possiblity to spend crypto, i imagine there is an exchange that transform the crypto in dollars before the payment Everything is existing, the bank, the crypto, the gold, the exchange and the credit card to spend the crypto, all we need to do is to put everything together but its only my view and as i am not crypto expert i cant really know if we can make it or not GDT will become the world reserve currency at the end and goods can be labelled in GDT because gold dont move, the price of a cow never changed in 5000 years in gold, its the value of dollar that moves which makes the gold price move, dollar goes down and makes gold goes up If we can lets begin the work, the ICO will help to create the bank and all the rest. And if we cant sorry to have bored you and i will be pleased to read your comment Thank you for reading |
|
|
|
I solved with this site https://eosauthority.com/ Free trx here 72 hours to unstack and then this error 4 days for nothing and research to understand how to do a simple trx wtf I sold every EOS and went back to BTC In fact this shit of blockchain 2.0 is not working after 10 years... Its way too complicated for normal people to use. In 10 years we will still be there while the FED will laught at us with the US digit dollars Its Game over  |
|
|
|
So if i buy now ( example $1000) , how much profit do i get for 6 month later ?
2 lambos and two houses approximately, ho ya and i almost forgot, certainly one or two horses also |
|
|
|
Hi There I wanted to do all in on XRB so i made some research and i came accross all these posts What are your thoughts please on this ? It appears (from the writeup) that you are unaware of sybil attacks?
The graph of transactions in bitcoin already functions like what you describe (except 'accounts' are single use txouts); Bram Cohen likes to call Bitcoin without the blockchain "bitpeso". In Bitcoin the blockchain is overlaid on top of "bitpeso" to resolve "complex forks" (using your language) in a manner that allows someone to join the network and know which resolution is authoritative in a way which is both robust to sybil attacks and does not require membership (because a membership process would create control over the system).
In your description you appears to liberally conflate forks and double-spending. In Bitcoin, double spending a traditional txout requires malicious behavior, just as you describe. Blockchain forking in the absence of double spending is benign and no different to the "multiple resolution rounds" you mention from your resolution protocol but fail to describe detail sufficient to permit any analysis.
afaics you have not definitively stated the frame-of-reference—employed by your ("every UTXO output has its own block chain")
Those words are in quotes though it is not factually a quotation. Perhaps American English is not your native language? I did not quote you. If I did, I would have used the normal forum quoting as I always do. Placing a phrase between double quotes can also mean that the quoted description is an example of how someone might say it (not specifically any person, since the quote was not attributed to any person) According to the writer's handbook https://writing.wisc.edu/Handbook/QPA_quoting.html Quotations are literal quotations and should cite references, Adding Clarification, Comment, or Correction requires square brackets around what you're modifying. Observe the following guidelines for uses of double quotation marks other than in material quoted directly from a source.
to introduce a word or phrase used as an ironic comment, as slang, or as an invented or coined expression. Use quotation marks the first time the word or phrase is used http://www.scribendi.com/advice/when_to_use_double_or_single_quotation_marks.en.htmln much specialist writing, including linguistics, philosophy, and theology, terms with particular meanings that are unique to that subject are often enclosed in single quotation mark
I'm sure you'll have no problem writing up another post I warned you not to write condescendingly to me again. Now I will more forcefully state the facts. I can see I am dealing with a pedantic Dunning-Kruger jackass who has too limited understanding of the technical field to discern technobabble from expertise. Arguing with someone who is not knowledgeable enough in the field to know whey are acting as a Dunning-Kruger jackass, ends up being an enormous waste of time and effort for the expert. When you are ready to come down from your ignorant high horse and learn, let me know. Note most readers here are not knowledgeable enough to discern that you are not an expert. Thus you can probably convince them to invest in your project. The proof of failure will come down the line. No need for me to educate you beforehand, given your attitude. I'm afraid I largely agree with TPTB_need_war; without a voting history, I find it hard to see how there can be a reliable, unforgeable consensus for 'now'. That's not correct, the consensus now is all that matters. For instance as humans we don't have a record of all governments and all decisions going back to the beginning of time yet we have a consensus about what we agree to at this moment. A historical record can be interesting but the only thing that matters is consensus at this current point in time, only historians care about anything else and currency isn't about a history lesson.
This is true in the real world because time travel is impossible. Cryptocurrencies must strive to make time travel, voting on past history, or presenting fraudulent histories very hard, or the 'now' won't be reliable or consistent. As monsterer and I have been alluding to up thread Monsterer and I have been having discussions and you may not be in as much agreement as you believe. I will wait to see a public post from monsterer if he disagrees with my assessment. Are you referring to private discussions with him? Because in my quick perusal of his public posts in this thread, they seem to be congruent with my points. Feel free to point out a case where you think his points are not congruent with mine. afaics you have not definitively stated the frame-of-reference—employed by your ("every UTXO output has its own block chain")
Those words are in quotes though it is not factually a quotation. Perhaps American English is not your native language? I did not quote you. If I did, I would have used the normal forum quoting as I always do. Placing a phrase between double quotes can also mean that the quoted description is an example of how someone might say it (not specifically any person, since the quote was not attributed to any person). design—for Byzantine fault tolerant consensus
There is no such thing as Byzantine fault tolerance since the byzantine problem is stated in terms of separation of communication a.k.a. network partitioning. Only after partitions have been merged can a final conclusion be reached for instance bitcoin isn't tolerant against partitioning since if the network was partitioned and each separate segment was generate separate block chains, a conclusion as to which is the longest couldn't be reached until the partitions were merged and the results compared, hence it would no longer by a byzantine problem. Please read up more on the topic before commenting on them. Do NOT again write an absurd condescending remark that assumes I hadn't yet researched the fundamental concepts. Try to remain respectful please (and leave the ad hominem diarrhea aside) as we had been up thread. I have no idea what rational basis you have told yourself to justify assuming I don't understand the definition of Byzantine fault tolerance. How could I possibly be commenting with so much technical knowledge in your thread if I hadn't yet researched the fundamental concepts. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Byzantine_fault_toleranceByzantine fault
Any fault presenting different symptoms to different observers
Byzantine failure
The loss of a system service due to a Byzantine fault in systems that require consensus
Your understanding of Byzantine fault tolerance is incorrect. Per the definition above, Bitcoin delivers the same expectations (symptoms) for CAP (consistency, access, and partition tolerance) to all observers which are participants in the longest chain partition. The probability of a failure decreases probabilistically over time as the number of confirmations on the longest chain increases. There are degenerate cases such as the 51% attack where Byzantine failure occurs. Note the double-spending on a minority chain is not a Byzantine failure, because by definition the minority chain is invalid. There is no such thing as absolute anything in the universe, thus arguing that Byzantine fault tolerance is not universal is a vacuous assertion. Byzantine fault tolerance is defined for a system and the defined objectivity of the system, not for universal absolutism. , so I have now expended the time to research, think, and hopefully correctly define it. Your design's frame-of-reference for Byzantine fault tolerant consensus is majority of the vote by the "voters" which have locked a suitable amount of coins (value). We must determine the (game theory) objectivity of this frame-of-reference and the impacts within the CAP theorem.
Again, the CAP theorem states that all three states cannot simultaneously be achieved so by the nature that RaiBlocks, in addition to any crypto currency, does not claim it can operate while partitioned, this means at most we're claiming 2 out of 3 which by definition satisfies the CAP theorem and no cryptocurrency out there is violating it. Please read more before commenting. This ad hominem noise again. Yet another vacuous argument demonstrating that you do not understand that Bitcoin is partition tolerant within its Byzantine fault tolerant objectivity. Byzantine fault tolerance doesn't mean that CAP has to be fulfilled for those observers who are ignoring the longest chain rule or who are unwilling to accept the probabilitistic nature of the expectations (and thus the fault tolerance). Within Bitcoin's objectivity of the longest chain, all three of the CAP attributes are attained. And my criticisms of your design are about its ill-defined objectivity. Let this technical rebuttal be instructive to you on the fact that my skills/expertise/research in this area are higher than you apparently assume (given your condescending remarks and your continual unwillingness to accept that 3 experts gmaxwell, monsterer, and myself have come into your thread and graciously tried to explain that your design has serious flaws). The rest of your reply really seemed to start going off the rails of rational logic. But I will try to find the desire to reply to it point-by-point after I cool down from the lashing of your condescending assumptions above. Nodes take the first block they receive or which ever block is winning in votes as observed by vote traffic coming off the network compared against the set of stake holders currently in the ledger. So at the very least, nodes which are syncing would accept my fork as truth? Also possibly online nodes if my fork was presented within some window of time? Sounds right I think, bootstrap poisoning is one attack vector. One way to address this would be to bootstrap to your representative or whoever gave you your wallet code. Presumably if you trust them enough to download and execute a program that manages your private keys, you can trust them to bootstrap you correctly. Another option is to bootstrap to someone you're interested in sending to, a merchant perhaps, because in the end the only thing that matters is if they'll accept your payments as valid and they'll tell you what they're accepting through bootstrapping. Another problem would be if almost everyone simultaneously changed their representative while forks were occurring. This would would require every account to be online and simultaneously signing a change to their representative; interesting but I don't see that actually happening. But after reading all this i concluded that XRB is not finally secure and that i needed to stay away of it, that's why no exchanges is selling it, its because they understood that its gona be a big mess no ? I see multiple experts of this forum telling that its XRB is faulty so i do not understand why this hype... Thank you for your help if maybe i am not understanding well the situation |
|
|
|
|
