 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 »
|
|
What do you guys think of idea ZEN to become multi POW coin.
One POW would be ASIC, one would be GPU frendly. Reward would be evenly distributed between between them.
That way both, ASIC and GPU proponents would be happy, and security of the chain would increase significantly.
Other proposition is to have 3 POW, one for ASIC, GPU and CPU, so that everyone have their opportunity to acquire ZEN.
GPU (and CPU) POW will be closely monitored and if hashrate increases significantly, hard fork to maintain GPU (CPU) mining will be conducted.
|
|
|
|
|
The biggest wallet without any doubt is Poloniex wallet.
|
|
|
|
|
@dbkeys When can we expect new hard fork? I can't find that information anywhere.
Changes you described are more than welcome at this point.
|
|
|
|
@onlineproof I've read the whole discussion - https://github.com/project-bitmark/bitmark/issues/68 I don't see why you oppose that proposal. Developers just want to reduce reward for merged mined blocks because cost of creating those blocks is much lower then block created with direct Bitmark mining. It makes sense to me. This would probably have very positive impact on the price. And for some reason you don't like that. It is very hard to understand you ideas in a discussion. Sometimes they are even laughable. What is your agenda here? Do you get a cut from merged miners? |
|
|
|
Top Mining Club is proud to announce first equihash mining pool for Bitmark - topmining.club. Pool fee for the first month is 0%, after first month pool fee would be 1%. Happy mining. PS. We'll soon start adding support for other Bitmark mining algorithms. Next in line is Cryptonight.Example command line options for some of the miners: EBVF: miner --server 172.104.215.38 --port 4032 --user <YOUR BITMARK ADDRESS> --pass x
Bminer: ADDRESS=<YOUR BITMARK ADDRESS>
USERNAME=$ADDRESS.w
POOL=172.104.215.38:4032
SCHEME=stratum
./bminer -uri $SCHEME://$USERNAME@$POOL -api 127.0.0.1:1880
For single GPU please use port 3032, for multiple gpu port 4032, and for nicehash 5032. |
|
|
|
Top Mining Club is proud to announce first equihash mining pool for Bitmark - topmining.club.Pool fee for the first month is 0%, after first month pool fee would be 1%. Happy mining. PS. We'll soon start adding support for other Bitmark mining algorithms. Next in line is Cryptonight.Example command line options for some of the miners: EBVF: miner --server 172.104.215.38 --port 4032 --user <YOUR BITMARK ADDRESS> --pass x
Bminer: ADDRESS=<YOUR BITMARK ADDRESS>
USERNAME=$ADDRESS.w
POOL=172.104.215.38:4032
SCHEME=stratum
./bminer -uri $SCHEME://$USERNAME@$POOL -api 127.0.0.1:1880
For single GPU please use port 3032, for multiple gpu port 4032, and for nicehash 5032.
|
|
|
|
Bitmarks "MARKS" be taken out of Maintenance mode & ENABLED FOR TRADING @Cryptopia_NZ on Friday "July 6th"
Thanks @Cryptopia_NZ MARKS is already being traded on Cryptopia. You probably meant deposits and withdrawals will be enabled again? |
|
|
|
EH: There was a recent sharp rise in EquiHash performance, if you know which pool / source this is coming from, please PM or post.
It is coming from http://www.smilingmining.com. They said on discord they are testing it now, and it should be available for miners soon. It is been a couple of days since, maybe they just decided to mine equihash only for themselves. |
|
|
|
Get some actual working nodes from the pool. Click on connections count. but now 7 day ago~and stop syn It could be an issue with out-of-sync clocks. Please check that your machine has the right time, and that Windows is configured for your time zone. To maintain the right time automatically: Click on the clock in the Task Bar, to open the "Date and Time" preferences window. Go to the 'Internet Time' tab, then 'Change Settings' button. Make sure that there is a good choice for "Synchronize with Internet Time Server", then click the "Update Now" button. - - - % - - - Also, there please use the new Windows wallets: ( 0.9.7.1-RC1 version ) My wallet is still not working. Jammed at 12day (s) behind  Try specifying 0.9.7 nodes in bitmark.conf. You have a list couple posts above. |
|
|
|
After I bit the bullet and deployed an Ubuntu 16.04 vps, resynched (and constantly restarting the daemon as it hangs regularily) I am now on block # 453174. At the same time, Cryptopia shows a blockheight of # 450962 and Tradesatoshi shows # 450909 (but says the wallet is in maintenance). BE1 shows # 450890 and BE2 # 453175. I guess I'll use the node list from Cryptopia and make sure I am on the same chain as they are so I can at least transfer the coins to them. This is the only block explorer, I can find right now, which is working: http://explorer.bitmark.co/That one stopped on first merged mine sha256d block. |
|
|
|
is there any problem with network? error -2: safe mode: warning: the network does not appear to fully agree! some miners appear to be experiencing issues. I had similar issues, and then I've added force connections to 0.9.7 nodes inside bitmark.conf, and now it is working fine. connect=144.217.73.112
connect=216.240.168.227
connect=173.255.212.141
connect=204.68.122.12
connect=204.68.122.18
connect=204.68.122.22
connect=204.68.122.40
connect=139.162.122.138
connect=216.240.168.226
connect=173.255.252.140
connect=185.185.68.71
addnode=94.23.33.83
addnode=79.143.180.57
addnode=139.162.232.242
addnode=139.162.128.92
addnode=94.137.177.227
addnode=108.170.1.134
addnode=157.161.128.56
addnode=172.104.157.27
addnode=173.255.252.140
addnode=188.124.94.249
|
|
|
|
After I bit the bullet and deployed an Ubuntu 16.04 vps, resynched (and constantly restarting the daemon as it hangs regularily) I am now on block # 453174. At the same time, Cryptopia shows a blockheight of # 450962 and Tradesatoshi shows # 450909 (but says the wallet is in maintenance). BE1 shows # 450890 and BE2 # 453175. I guess I'll use the node list from Cryptopia and make sure I am on the same chain as they are so I can at least transfer the coins to them. This is the only block explorer, I can find right now, which is working: http://explorer.bitmark.co/ |
|
|
|
Though deposits seem not to work, my test deposit of 50BTM from 2 days ago still doesn't show up. Do yourself all a favour and test first with a small amount before moving big chunks of BTM to Polo! It works, but you have to open support ticket on Polo, and then Polo staff will increase you balance manually. I don't know why they are doing it manually, but that is procedure for now. |
|
|
|
Any update for Cryptopia list?
I join To a question. What with listing on cryptopia? Never Look at this line from topic starter post and do not say what you did not know about. Exchanges (PayPal -> BTM) : Poloniex :(Early 2018) Cryptopia lol the man isn't wrong. Bitmark was suppose to be listed on YoBit last month, but thats a joke now We don't need YoBit now, when Poloniex has enabled BTM wallet. damn thats the best news i've read today. not too sure how i missed that. meh to YoBit then As posted in the older BTM thread, deposits seem not to work yet. At least a few people complain (inlcuding me) that their deposits do not show up (mine was ~2days ago and has hundreds of confirmations). Make sure you test with a small amount before sending all your BTM into Polo-Limbo.. It works, but you have to open support ticket on Polo, and then Polo staff will increase you balance manually. I don't know why they are doing it manually, but that is procedure for now. |
|
|
|
Any update for Cryptopia list?
I join To a question. What with listing on cryptopia? Never Look at this line from topic starter post and do not say what you did not know about. Exchanges (PayPal -> BTM) : Poloniex :(Early 2018) Cryptopia lol the man isn't wrong. Bitmark was suppose to be listed on YoBit last month, but thats a joke now We don't need YoBit now, when Poloniex has enabled BTM wallet. |
|
|
|
How does the community feel about a new SLACK Channel dedicated to bitmark & MARKS from this day forward?
It is good idea to have bitmark SLACK channel. Why do we need another thread? Yeah....I think we can just delete users and open it up to new community members let me see if I can filter out users that have not checked-in to SLACK in over 3-6mon Could you open a discord channel then all the people are interesting can join. +1 for discord. |
|
|
|
How does the community feel about a new SLACK Channel dedicated to bitmark & MARKS from this day forward?
It is good idea to have bitmark SLACK channel. Why do we need another thread? |
|
|
|
Hi dbkeys,
Do we have a date for the listing on Binance? I have an answer from Binance by the end from the month....
Thanks
A bit early for April fools, isn't it? Maybe it's because it isn't a fool? 😂. But yes, show us the email... Let's first be added to Cryptopia and YoBit. Hopefully it is this week. |
|
|
|
Do we have a date for the listing on cryptopia?
From Cryptopia, dated February 26: "I can confirm that MARKS (Bitmark) will be listed within roughly the next 3 weeks." We decided to go with the MARKS ticker symbol, as we felt it is much more descriptive of the coin and its purpose, and also because we can standarize on all exchanges with the MARKS ticker. Would naming it MARKS be a little confusing? Because currently BTM wallet on about to send some coins states that 1000 MARK is 1 BTM. |
|
|
|
|
