Bitcoin Forum
June 12, 2021, 12:03:54 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.21.1 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 ... 606 »
1  Other / Meta / Re: VOD should be removed from default trust for systematic abuse of his position on: August 11, 2020, 09:48:52 PM
Don't be lazy...

I'm not repeating myself infinitely because you don't like the answer.

If something doesn't exist it doesn't matter how much effort I exert, I will never find it.

Please quote your explanation since you assert it is totally real and you already did it.
2  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Post your favorite Biden Memes here on: August 11, 2020, 09:18:27 PM
I guess that is why he insisted on a woman VP...
3  Other / Meta / Re: VOD should be removed from default trust for systematic abuse of his position on: August 11, 2020, 08:51:26 PM
You and Mr. OG seem to post together...

I explained my feedback many times.  You don't like it, so you keep asking again. 

Great. Please quote.
4  Other / Meta / Re: VOD should be removed from default trust for systematic abuse of his position on: August 11, 2020, 07:34:25 PM
From what I could see through all this 5 years of accusation, there's only debate and insults happening without proper evidences. It could have been resolved if @TECSHARE compile evidences, arguments, and statements that might help with his campaign in a single post. How about you compile it in the first page? Even I don't have time to go page to page just to read this but I had to read this for the sake of context (takes time/days but this thread is a fun read lol). It's not helping your cause.

I'm not against anyone here. If you guys really want to finish this. Then give and compile concrete evidences so that theymos can look into this much easier. Imagine 5 years of debate and still not a single thing happening.

Like give examples, screenshots, quotes, or anything that might help everyone here.

From what I can see, this will never end.

So in short, what you are saying is I should compile all of the evidence that what I am accused of, in spite of it never being elaborated on by Vod, is not true? What? You might address that to Vod, because he has substantiated ZERO of the claims against me which he has used as an excuse to abuse the trust system against me in retaliation.

P.S. Theymos clearly doesn't give a fuck. Vod will remain his secret embarrassment because he refuses to take responsibility for propping him up.

Last I checked accusers were supposed to prove their accusations, not vice versa, but maybe you know better.




I'm not against anyone here. If you guys really want to finish this. Then give and compile concrete evidences so that theymos can look into this much easier. Imagine 5 years of debate and still not a single thing happening.

From what I can see, this will never end.

It's not a debate.  Techy is a troll.  He changes his position and demands as the situation changes.  I have never abused my position on default trust, as evidenced by never having been removed from it. 

You are incapable of documenting any of your negative trust ratings against me with any sort of documentation whatsoever, let alone even a plausible explanation for them.

3 Total negative ratings currently, and about 7+ in the past he removed, usually because he was shamed by the community into doing so or everyone would be forced to admit the trust system is a joke. Since everyone knows the trust system is a joke now, no one is bothering to preserve it and in their mind there is no need to take action against its abuse (unless of course it is self serving in some ulterior way).

I think you take criticism very poorly.
Feel free to make a topic about it. Until then stop posting off topic in a pathetic attempt to distract from the reality that Vod is incapable of justifying his behavior.

I've justified it to the 99.9%.  I can't spend all my time on the special needs 0.1%.  :/


Great. Please quote.
5  Economy / Collectibles / Re: [WTS] Garbage Pail Kids Cards - HUGE LOT on: August 11, 2020, 07:19:09 PM
i remember these as a kid, are any cards valuable, they had recently released a eos on chain set I think

I am sure some of them are. I have not picked through them, I don't have the time to look up each individual card. I saw a few that would probably qualify as errors, and there are hundreds of cards. Check out the images and feel free to hunt around for yourself and see what you can find!
6  Other / Politics & Society / Re: An Investigation into 5G + Thoughts on Health & the Coronavirus w/ cited sources on: August 11, 2020, 05:03:47 PM
Energy is absorbed. Oxygen properties are unchanged.

You really enjoy contradicting yourself and using straw man arguments don't you? If it is absorbing energy... how are its properties unchanged?
7  Economy / Collectibles / Re: [WTS] Garbage Pail Kids Cards - HUGE LOT on: August 11, 2020, 07:11:57 AM
update
8  Other / Politics & Society / Re: An Investigation into 5G + Thoughts on Health & the Coronavirus w/ cited sources on: August 11, 2020, 06:24:08 AM
60 GHz frequency causes electrons on oxygen molecules to spin, which makes the hemoglobin in our blood unable to uptake the oxygen and carry it to the rest of our body

It doesn't change chemical properties of oxygen. So much for "factual investigation" if the first randomly picked sentence turned out to be false.


https://lmgtfy.com/?q=5G+conspiracy+theories+debunked&s=d

You must be new to the Internet.

Repeat after me.

I, Suchmoon am wrong, and I will not compound my display of ignorance by denying it and again acting arrogant while in the process of being horribly mistaken.


"Fixed Wireless Communications at 60GHz Unique Oxygen Absorption Properties"

https://www.rfglobalnet.com/doc/fixed-wireless-communications-at-60ghz-unique-0001
9  Economy / Goods / Shark ION Robot Vacuum R75 with Wi-Fi and Voice Control Alexa Compatible $100 on: August 11, 2020, 02:36:50 AM
I have two Shark ION robot vacuum model R75 (RV750) with Wi-Fi and Alexa voice control capability. They are used, in great working and cosmetic condition. It includes the factory charging wall wort and automatic charging dock. Get them for ($100) each or ($150) for both. Price includes shipping to the US. LTC also accepted. PM me.


Retail Reference: https://www.amazon.com/Aspiradora-conectividad-Control-funciona-RV750/dp/B075JRB2Z9/









10  Economy / Collectibles / Re: "What is Bitcoin?" Silkscreen Posters From 2014 - Limited Numbered & Signed Run on: August 11, 2020, 01:38:39 AM
update
11  Other / Politics & Society / Re: [BET] Trump or not Trump 2020, eddie13 vs suchmoon on: August 10, 2020, 05:30:35 PM
Shipments Of 20,000 Fake IDs From China Seized By Feds Ahead Of Election"

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/shipments-20000-fake-ids-china-seized-feds-ahead-election

Russia working with Republicans = credible threat justifying years of investigation in spite of total lack of evidence.

China working with Democrats = INCONCEIVABLE!
12  Other / Meta / Re: VOD should be removed from default trust for systematic abuse of his position on: August 10, 2020, 02:23:55 AM
I think you take criticism very poorly.
Feel free to make a topic about it. Until then stop posting off topic in a pathetic attempt to distract from the reality that Vod is incapable of justifying his behavior.

I've justified it to the 99.9%.  I can't spend all my time on the special needs 0.1%.  :/


Great. Please quote.
13  Economy / Reputation / Re: Ree @hacker1001101001 ICO bump account on: August 09, 2020, 06:13:23 PM
So how much longer do you think you guys will need for your homoerotic forum cop wankfest before you guys are finished?
14  Economy / Reputation / Re: Vod is a liar. on: August 09, 2020, 06:11:44 PM
More deflection...

He says as he uses his accusations against OGNasty to avoid being forced to justify his own actions in at least two separate threads. What is the subject of this thread again? Oh right, Vod is a liar. Who is deflecting? Weird how the mods never seem to clean up this kind of garbage from specific people here, but be assured there is no selective enforcement.
15  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Trump has declared that he’ll ban Tiktok over privacy concerns!!! on: August 09, 2020, 01:54:43 AM
Nothing to see here. Move along.

"As Trump Advances Ban, CIA Says No Evidence of TikTok Giving Data to China"

https://news.antiwar.com/2020/08/07/as-trump-advances-ban-cia-says-no-evidence-of-tiktok-giving-data-to-china/
16  Economy / Reputation / Re: Vod is a liar. on: August 08, 2020, 09:37:24 PM
Mr. OG, what did you do with the 2600 BTC you owed your investors?  In your wallet one day, then vanished and you paid out an insurance fund.   It will bug you till the day you are stabbed to death that I found out.  

Write whatever lies you want.   As far as I'm concerned, you're posting from jail on your boyfriend's phone.

Vod’s fantasies about me have turned homoerotic.  We all knew it was coming.  The death threat is probably uncalled for though considering what a bitch he is.  I wonder if this was another drunk post or if he’s stroking out again.

I would say Vod is firmly into felony territory under US as well as Canadian law. It would be a shame if the forum suffered some kind of legal action when he inevitably harms some one or causes some massive financial damage in spite of his clearly illegal behavior being quite public. At this point it is kind of hard to claim ignorance.


It should also be noted that what Vod did also qualifies as harassment under Canadian law.

"The Criminal Harassment section of the Criminal Code of Canada states:

264. (1) No person shall, without lawful authority and knowing that another person is harassed or recklessly as to whether the other person is harassed, engage in conduct referred to in subsection (2) that causes that other person reasonably, in all the circumstances, to fear for their safety or the safety of anyone known to them.

Prohibited conduct

(2) The conduct mentioned in subsection (1) consists of

(a) repeatedly following from place to place the other person or anyone known to them;

(b) repeatedly communicating with, either directly or indirectly, the other person or anyone known to them;

(c) besetting or watching the dwelling-house, or place where the other person, or anyone known to them, resides, works, carries on business or happens to be; or

(d) engaging in threatening conduct directed at the other person or any member of their family.

Punishment

(3) Every person who contravenes this section is guilty of

(a) an indictable offence and is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding ten years; or

(b) an offence punishable on summary conviction.

As can be seen, sub-sections 2 (a), (c) and (d) describe rather obvious forms of prohibited conduct—stalking and threatening behaviour. However, the vast majority of charges laid under this section of the Criminal Code are under 2 (b) and deal with a much more subtle issue–persistent communication with another individual. Cary Grant and Christian Grey beware.

In our age of the internet and ubiquitous smartphones, instant and whimsical communication is easy. But take heed; one too many emails, texts, or facebook messages can land a jilted lover or persistent suitor in criminal trouble.

So when does unwanted communication become criminal? In fact, section 264 (2) (b) of the Code has quite precise requirements before proof can be found. Based on the legislation and its interpretation by the courts, the following must be shown to establish the elements of criminal harassment by communication:

The communication must be repetitive (however, this has been interpreted by the courts to mean simply more than one occasion of communication).

The target of the communication must be harassed (a definition of harassment often quoted with approval by Canadian courts is “The complainant must be more than vexed, disquieted or annoyed by the prohibited conduct. The Crown must demonstrate that the complainant was tormented, troubled, worried continually or chronically, plagued, bedeviled and badgered”—note the use of the disjunctive “or”).

The defendant must know that the complainant is harassed (on the other hand, keep in mind that such knowledge need not be proven by direct evidence; the necessary knowledge on the part of the defendant may be inferred from the circumstances of the communication and may include reference to the nature of the relationship prior to the conduct that forms the basis of the charge).

The conduct complained of must cause the complainant to fear for his or her safety or the safety of anyone known to him or her (once again, the caveat in point 3 above also applies here—the necessary fear may be inferred from the context in which the communication takes place including the history of the relationship between the parties)."

https://davidgbayliss.com/criminal-harassment-canada/


17  Other / Meta / Re: VOD should be removed from default trust for systematic abuse of his position on: August 08, 2020, 05:33:10 PM
I think you take criticism very poorly.
Feel free to make a topic about it. Until then stop posting off topic in a pathetic attempt to distract from the reality that Vod is incapable of justifying his behavior.

I've justified it to the 99.9%.  I can't spend all my time on the special needs 0.1%.  :/


Great. Please quote.
18  Other / Meta / Re: VOD should be removed from default trust for systematic abuse of his position on: August 08, 2020, 04:40:14 PM
I think you take criticism very poorly.

Feel free to make a topic about it. Until then stop posting off topic in a pathetic attempt to distract from the reality that Vod is incapable of justifying his behavior.


19  Economy / Reputation / Re: [SOLVED] Abuser gave me a negative feedback. on: August 08, 2020, 02:09:23 PM
Notice how Dr. Techy ignores my comments, then complains when I do the same to him?

Imagine complaining about something for a decade...

Unlike you Vod, I am perfectly willing to discuss my behavior. You on the other hand abuse all of the forums systems then run away like a scared little girl and refuse to respond any time anyone asks you to explain yourself. Then you go hide like a child so people forget how horribly you have been acting until the coast is clear, then you do it again! You are an old, fat, bald, alcoholic, mentally unstable child.
20  Other / Meta / Re: VOD should be removed from default trust for systematic abuse of his position on: August 08, 2020, 02:01:56 PM
There's actually considerable overlap in the delusional qualities of schizophrenics and those with Paranoid Personality Disorder. Speaking of the latter, here is a list of some of their characteristics:

  • Doubt the commitment, loyalty, or trustworthiness of others, believing others are exploiting or deceiving them.
  • Are unforgiving and hold grudges.
  • Are hypersensitive and take criticism poorly.
  • Read hidden meanings in the innocent remarks or casual looks of others.
  • Perceive attacks on their character that are not apparent to others; they generally react with anger and are quick to retaliate.
  • Cannot see their role in problems or conflicts, believing they are always right.
  • Have difficulty relaxing.
  • Are hostile, stubborn, and argumentative.

It's almost like 90% of somebody's presence on this forum (won't say who) is guided by a pathological state of mind.

I can respect that you don't want to call out Vod by name, and that is a very accurate description of his behavior. Thanks for that.
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 ... 606 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!