|
541
|
Other / Meta / Re: VOD should be removed from default trust for systematic abuse of his position
|
on: May 22, 2020, 09:00:45 AM
|
You idiots can relax. Once I post the proof I'll be moving to my new clubhouse, and I will make sure I review all feedback I've left regarding OG's scam. My community will probably view him as a thief ( in blockchain we trust) - but your community can view him however you want, and I won't interfere. There are also tens of thousands who don't care enough to wade through all the junk you guys post to hide information. But right now I'm still building the relevant blockchain transactions, and OG is still calling me a pedophile as his defense. Like pirate, he has nothing to lose. TLDR; I don't trust you because of your actions; when I leave I won't care about you.  Edit: Shouldn't this be moved to reputation? What does this have to do with you abusing the trust system to punish people for leaving merit you don't approve of? |
|
|
|
|
542
|
Other / Meta / Re: HOLY FUCK !!!! THE SCAMMER IS ALSO A PLAGIARIST OF GIANT MAGNITUDE - SIG BAN NO
|
on: May 22, 2020, 08:58:34 AM
|
What I really wonder is, what the plagiarism bot was doing? It found lots of people with that offense but somehow skipped lauda which had multiple offenses.
Is the bot dumb or was it because the data was too big (26k posts) so it said "fuck it im skippin it" Or perhaps the bot is being used in a more targeted way as an automatic peanut hunting machine. |
|
|
|
|
543
|
Other / Politics & Society / Re: Medical experts within the Trump Administration want a slow reoopening
|
on: May 22, 2020, 06:29:18 AM
|
Let me know when you find some sources of your own supporting the premise that experts broke down the macroeconomic economic impact of these perpetual lock downs. Critiquing my sources is not the same as having your own. You cry and claim I am just making baseless proclamations, but you yourself have substantiated jack shit as you accuse me of the same.
Fair enough, to me it is common sense, but I suppose to you the info in your sources might be common sense. Anyway, tell me where you start to disagree and I'll start from there. Trump has an interest in the economy, the White House has economic advisors, Trump has consulted with his White House economic advisors, Trump has consulted with his medical advisors, They didn't just make up random stuff to tell the president, they both have the capability (human resources, equipment, ability) to make predictions, Policy was created based on their input. I believe I was very clear. The government is not monolithic, and a few key individuals can and have sold out this country over the years for private gain. "Common sense" and beliefs are another way of saying baseless assumptions they did their jobs and in our interest. Right now our country is filled with saboteurs at every level of government working for various ideological and profit motives. People don't know it yet, but we are already at war with China. We have been for at least a few years, and they have been at war with us for years before that. They have a very robust fifth column within our nation and part of all the chaos that is happening now is a result of that conflict. |
|
|
|
|
544
|
Other / Politics & Society / Re: Medical experts within the Trump Administration want a slow reoopening
|
on: May 22, 2020, 04:21:54 AM
|
|
Let me know when you find some sources of your own supporting the premise that experts broke down the macroeconomic economic impact of these perpetual lock downs. Critiquing my sources is not the same as having your own. You cry and claim I am just making baseless proclamations, but you yourself have substantiated jack shit as you accuse me of the same.
|
|
|
|
|
545
|
Other / Meta / Re: VOD should be removed from default trust for systematic abuse of his position
|
on: May 22, 2020, 01:29:39 AM
|
Now Vod is running around red tagging people for leaving merit he doesn't like.
No I'm not, troll. Edit: OG claims he heard me say I abuse children. Attacking me is his only defense. I try to post new information and it's quickly hidden by people who support the scammer or dislike me. I did mention this already, and I won't again. Troll away. What does this have to do with you abusing the trust system to punish people for leaving merit you don't approve of? |
|
|
|
|
548
|
Other / Meta / Re: VOD should be removed from default trust for systematic abuse of his position
|
on: May 22, 2020, 12:01:06 AM
|
vod gave me neg feedback for i gave merit to OG "Vod 2020-05-21 Reference Helping a scammer conceal a 2,600BTC scam." Now Vod is running around red tagging people for leaving merit he doesn't like. How much longer are you people still including Vod in your trust lists going to keep enabling this abusive behavior? As long as he abuses people you don't like or care about it is ok right? |
|
|
|
|
550
|
Other / Politics & Society / Re: Medical experts within the Trump Administration want a slow reoopening
|
on: May 21, 2020, 11:34:50 PM
|
And I see you have totally given up on attempting to make any kind of logical argument and have gone full logical fallacy retard. At least you are exposing yourself for what you are this time instead of just pussing out and running away like you usually do when you give up.
No, my second point was actually real, you communist puppet. You are allowed to make outlandish claims without any proof other than that its a possibility, so I'm just mirroring that sentiment. IE this is an intentional economic/power play. Is it not equally as likely that this is an intentional economic/power play but perpetrated by another government rather than our own? I just wanted you to see how joyous it is when all of the proof in the world means nothing in the face of some random conspiracy theory, and everyone else is a jackass because they dont immediately buy into your claims. Even the people who hunt bigfoot look for hair/tracks DNA, speak with people who claim they've seen something, etc. You've provided no data, actions, evidence, but it somehow is on equal standing with a countable number of bodies, data from hospitals, economic advisors and the models they've used for decades on a daily basis for any mundane reason. People run away from talking with you because theres absolutely no reason to, your logic that you expect everyone to buy into defies common sense yet stands on its own with no evidence. If you declare the moon is cheese, it is so. You have no burden of proof, but the burden of proof on others is impossible because if it fits into the framework of the standard for collecting information and analyzing it, its somehow unreliable because thats what they want you to think. On top of that, you aren't particularly pleasant to talk to. Sticking your fingers in your ears and going NANANANA until the other party walks away doesn't make your points any less groundless, it just means you get to continue your conversation all by yourself. Look at BADecker, they're out there as well but people continue to entertain them because though the standard of proof is still impossible to present, at least every other word out of BADecker's mouth isn't, Sweet strawman you non sequitur logical fallacy, and righteous indignation. Here is logic: Assumption 1: Government wants you to continue paying your taxes and their salaries. Assumption 2: They have plenty of employees to model different economic situations on retainer so they can decide economic policy. Assumption 3: They have plenty of internal medical employees (CDC/FDA/NHS) There is a deadly virus which we've both acknowledged exists. The government aims to maximize tax revenue to pay their salaries, compete in the global pissing contest that is, who has the highest GDPs/wealthiest countries etc. External medical personnel (in every country) said oh damn look at this virus, its bad, it'll cause X people to die and Y people to get sick. Internal government medical agencies see that information and go, yup that is right it looks like X people will die and Y people will get sick, here is what we should do (social distancing/shutdowns/masks). Trump administration that is not medical personnel says ok, we need to weigh X people dying and Y people getting sick with the economic damage that will be caused from the suggested measures. They get their wizards to model various scenarios and say, yup if we do this for this long, we'll lose $Z. So you compare the $ in X, Y, and Z and make a policy to minimize all three of those things. So thats the logical course of action, why should we expect them to do that? Is it because we're government stooges? No, its because thats what their job is and whats in their best interest. The Berkeley economics major employed does not care a single iota about your rights, protecting them or taking them away. They don't get to hold your head down in the mud and make you eat worms whether they fudge the numbers or not. They just want to do their job and get a paycheck. Whenever I get my oil changed, I don't hugely worry about them using vegetable oil instead of motor oil, because the people working there have no reason to try to screw me over. The reasonable assumption is that people will do their job. Even if economics modeler A was disgruntled and secretly a spy sent to destroy our financial system, economics modeler B-Z6 would go, hey thats not right? So we've got this conclusion drawn by multiple medical professionals and multiple economics professionals that we should follow a certain plan to minimize the three concerns. Nah, all of that logic is nonsense because the gubmint wants you to submit to them. We should assume they don't act on logic based on the resources they have available, and instead are just out to get us. They'll hurt their own wallets to tell people to stay inside. Medical researchers A-Z15 that are unrelated are just going to let lies pass through. Economics advisors who do this type of work on a daily basis are suddenly stricken with the brain dumb and are no longer competent to do their jobs. Economy is complex, so all of those forecasts that we've been doing all along are no longer able to be completed, and it is to be assumed that policy created is either a toss at a dart board, or an intentional act of destruction to... destroy themselves...? On top of all of that, on the 1 in a trillion chance the US Government is actually doing all of this out of incompetence or malice, that would also imply every other country following the same plan is also doing this out of incompetence or malice. So we're now to either believe this is a global ploy, or that there is not a single competent government out there and every unrelated economics/medical team are all coming to similar conclusions absolutely by coincidence. Nah, lets discard all of that and go with Communist ploy to take over the world. I spent 20 minutes writing a post, and rather than replying, "You see, here are the numbers that show X, Y, and Z, based on this model and as you can see at our current paces and projections, Z was always significantly higher. Don't forget the government also has voting interests in not letting people die over the economy" I'll get, YOU IDIOT GOVERNMENT STOOGE, THEY GOT YA! Some buzz words from debate club, and a rehashing of, they are out to get you so they'll act against their own interest in order to get you. If you question me or ask for more details, you're an idiot, and if you leave the thread because its pointless to continue as my words are gospel without a single iota of proof to my claim, you're running from the truuuuuth. Just because you dismiss or don't understand the evidence I present doesn't mean I haven't presented it. You keep telling me about how I provide no support for my claims when I have provided MANY sources, and so far you haven't provided shit but "trust the government, they are here to help!" and "they are the experts!". No documentation. No evidence, just proclamations of correctitude on your part along with strings of logical fallacies and ad hominem attacks. You don't like being treated like a chump? Start documenting your claims. Provide evidence. Use actual logic, not just declaring yourself correct because mommy and daddy gubmint says so. Here is a small sample of the supporting documentation I have provided in this and other threads related to this subject. Actually review some of it before responding chump. Time isn't on your side. Self imposed destruction:Overstating of the threat:"It is important to remember that death certificate reporting may not meet mandatory reporting requirements for reportable diseases; contact the local health department regarding regulations specific to the jurisdiction.In cases where a definite diagnosis of COVID–19 cannot be made, but it is suspected or likely (e.g., the circumstances are compelling within a reasonable degree of certainty), it is acceptable to report COVID–19 on a death certificate as “probable” or “presumed.”" https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid19/index.htm |
|
|
|
|
551
|
Other / Politics & Society / Re: 2020 Democrats
|
on: May 21, 2020, 04:51:35 AM
|
Thanks for demonstrating to everyone
That you're a delusional conspiratard who can't be trusted to not fly off the handle even with something as simple as a wager. If you were truly so worried about the law enforcement coming after your nickname and avatar on some website we could have done what Twitchy suggested... maybe have you change your avatar to Hillary's photo if you lose, that'd have been fun and hopefully not against the law in whatever hillbilly shithole you live. The text under the avatar could say "I was wrong". Remind me to laugh extra hard when Biden isn't the Dem candidate and Trump wins in November.
Well, I'm still waiting for the military tribunals and the war with China, so pace yourself, Nostradamus. And stop topic sliding, you were very specific as to who the candidate will be so man up and own it. There never was a wager. I said no, you keep pressing the issue, but I am "flying off the handle". You, your red nosed buddies, and your demands for bets can all line up and kiss my ass. I don't give a fuck about your demands. You are a bunch of thirsty chumps. Yeah, some one should do something about all these hillbillies in Chicago. Speaking of being wrong... you dildos have been rather quiet in the Pussygate thread lately with your assurances of Flynn's guilt. Can you say you were wrong Suchgoon? Maybe you would prefer to keep telling me about how that Russiagate evidence will materialize suddenly after 3 years? Perhaps instead you wish to regale me with tales of Justice Kavanaugh's guilt? You are all pretenders, posers, and muppets with floppy shoes and red noses. You can spew all the bullshit you like, you aren't going to change reality in your perpetually desperate attempts to convince people of your personal delusions via repetition. |
|
|
|
|
552
|
Other / Politics & Society / Re: University Study Finds Fire Did Not Cause Building 7's Collapse on 9/11
|
on: May 21, 2020, 01:20:35 AM
|
I rather doubt he’s an Iranian puppet.
More likely just a silly deluded fool who likes to perpetuate his nonsensical threads on
these boards because of course he can.
I always picture the sane folks on this forum who are familiar with his buffoonery,
more than likely just shake their head, roll their eyes and scroll past him whenever
he chimes in with his drivel.
That still makes him a an Iranian puppet, just an unintentional Iranian puppet. It remains that argument by proclamation isn't a debate or a discussion.[/quote] What does that make you? A Saudi puppet? |
|
|
|
|
553
|
Other / Politics & Society / Re: China US Trade war next level
|
on: May 21, 2020, 01:17:18 AM
|
You're the one desperately trying to make a connection, where none exists. Let me spell it out for you: It's quite possible for me to suspect that the Obama administration conspired to fabricate a crime to pin on Michael Flynn without believing there's some super-secret, uber-powerful, international mafia pulling the strings. There's reasonable evidence to support the former, but only fantasy supporting the latter. Despite your efforts to make it appear otherwise, there's no contradiction in my position.
You're like a child who's stubbornly digging in his heals once his argument has been dismissed. Now you're following me around the P&S board, making off-topic posts in every thread in which I've made a post, desperately trying insinuate a contradiction.
It's not all about you and your ignorant theories. And, please do keep in mind; I am entitled to disagree with you. Yes, who ever heard of The Triads, or Chinese tongs right? Certainly just a myth. Mafias certainly aren't secret or powerful, and the CCP certainly isn't a gangster organization. This all is just as much of a myth as all the times the US was sold out for kickbacks under the Obama administration (not to mention the Clintons). After all, them selling out US national security to Chinese interests is unimaginable. You are entitled to you own opinion. You are not entitled to your own reality. |
|
|
|
|
554
|
Other / Politics & Society / Re: 2020 Democrats
|
on: May 21, 2020, 01:10:04 AM
|
jibbering Thanks for demonstrating to everyone what petty harpies you and your clown clan are, and exactly why I am not interested in giving you any opportunity whatsoever to harass me using the state as a weapon to do so. After all that is exactly what Vod did, and he is still on all of your trust lists, so you have made it clear you find that behavior acceptable. Remind me to laugh extra hard when Biden isn't the Dem candidate and Trump wins in November. |
|
|
|
|
555
|
Other / Politics & Society / Re: 2020 Democrats
|
on: May 20, 2020, 06:36:01 PM
|
I mean plus like, what prosecutor is going to go after the people betting among themselves? That's pretty much unheard of when it comes to small recreational people. They're going to go after the people using setting up gambling clubs and rings, and the people running big programs like this. No one cares (AT ALL) about the little people that are doing casual gambling. I personally know people who have lost everything due to a related incident. For some one studying finance you are pretty ignorant about how much destruction can be cause with the totalitarian financial regulations that exist in the US. Not saying it doesn't exist, just saying the likelihood of it happening is probably pretty low. You can do whatever you want when it comes to gambling online and all that, honestly it doesn't bother me in any way at all. You do you man. The billions of dollars of assets stripped from people in this country under civil asset forfeiture laws say otherwise. For some one who is so lassie-fair you seem rather interested in my decision here. By the way, weren't you supposed to be ignoring me for like the 4th time? |
|
|
|
|
556
|
Other / Politics & Society / Re: 2020 Democrats
|
on: May 20, 2020, 06:30:22 PM
|
It is not paranoia if people are really out to get you, and you floppy shoe fucks sure have proven that.
You believing people "are really out to get you" is a product of your own paranoia. Regardless, there's a million ways to handle a bet where you would never sacrifice your legal well-being if you were interested, not that it was ever an issue for 1 second. Yeah, I am sure your continual manufacturing of narratives about me here all around the forum have nothing to do with it, or your swarm of red nose clan members. I don't gamble. Is that good enough for you little girl? I mean plus like, what prosecutor is going to go after the people betting among themselves? That's pretty much unheard of when it comes to small recreational people. They're going to go after the people using setting up gambling clubs and rings, and the people running big programs like this. No one cares (AT ALL) about the little people that are doing casual gambling. I personally know people who have lost everything due to a related incident. It is just a matter of you having something they want. Ever heard of civil asset forfeiture? No prosecution needed. For some one studying finance you are pretty ignorant about how much destruction can be caused with the totalitarian financial regulations that exist in the US. |
|
|
|
|
557
|
Other / Politics & Society / Re: China US Trade war next level
|
on: May 20, 2020, 10:47:25 AM
|
You aren't a conspiracy theorist are you?
Lol, you never quite do you? I don't consider myself a conspiracy theorist, no. But that doesn't mean that I don't believe conspiracies exist. It also doesn't mean you'll let the discussion we had in the other thread remain in that thread, but I've grown to expect that from you. Perhaps because it is the same discussion and you have yet to make the connection. |
|
|
|
|
558
|
Other / Politics & Society / Re: 2020 Democrats
|
on: May 20, 2020, 09:39:27 AM
|
No, it makes me smart enough to not openly engage in criminal activity with people who have demonstrated very clearly they will do anything they can to attack me, interestingly enough simply because they don't agree with me.
Sounds an awful lot like you are using your well-known penchant for paranoia as an excuse to chicken out. It is not paranoia if people are really out to get you, and you floppy shoe fucks sure have proven that. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
