For the projects that I like and truly believe in (which pretty much means almost my entire portfolio), I plan to hodl

I agree with many others here, DeepOnion has been the best

I've seen some ICOs allow fiat purchases, so yes it is possible

I actively try (and have been able to so far) to avoid selling at a loss - not that all my investments are positive but I just have not sold those that did not do well

NEO has been for a while now one of my key holdings and I think the prospects for it are fantastic!

Yeah you definitely have to exercise some discretion when choosing which airdrops to join, otherwise it'll be a huge waste of time. If you are able to find some community managers who are trustworthy with the airdrops they hold, then maybe you can keep in touch with them and have them tell you whenever they are organizing one.

I would think to view it as any other token/alt coin - if you feel the project makes sense then hodl, otherwise sell immediately

Ethereum, Stellar, Neo are my forever hodls...

Other alts that I like include: republic protocol, te-food

Hey it'll be fine, people make mistakes all the time so don't be too hard on yourself. Just learn from your mistakes and try to move on.

It really depends on what your goals are - I would say that cashing out your initial investment is a great way to allow yourself to feel better about taking (additional) risks, but at the same time if you view your initial investment as "lost" capital, then you can just let it ride!

I would very much rather invest time and effort into bounty campaigns. However if you prefer airdrops, all you have to do mostly is to just register your details (e.g. telegram username, wallet address etc.) with the team and that's about it. Usually the project team will ask you to stay in their telegram chat channel till the airdrop happens (typically a few weeks from the time they start)

One of the largest lessons I've learned thus far in crypto-investing is to never have knee-jerk reaction to anything that's happening in the market. Be confident of the conviction you have in your investments and disregard whatever fud others might be spreading.

I believe that some were prescient enough to understand the potential of cryptos and hence should be rewarded, while of course others likely just rode the wave and got lucky. Even for the ones who got "lucky" I think deserve it because to be a crypto millionaire you must have really had some sort of conviction in cryptos. Sure, the value exploded recently and it did not take a significant investment "back in the day" to be a crypto millionaire now, but if we draw an analogy, it might be like asking you to invest in something that has almost absolutely no value now and that no one really believes in

Sure I do, but you really have to practise some discretion when participating. A lot of them out there are simply a waste of time. I would at least have a look at the company's website and glance over their whitepapers.

Gender equality should not to be mixed with just solely women rights. Granted, many women are all too familiar with the “glass ceiling” that keeps them looking up at similarly (or less-) qualified men in positions above them. Add to this a wage gap that, while narrowing, stubbornly persists.

It has been suggested that a dual-pronged effort of increasing entry and retention of more women to the workforce represents a substantial opportunity for growth of the world’s principal economy. In the US this is a 5-10% addition to GDP in just a few decades.

Education can be the springboard for women’s progress. Specifically, promoting higher education in STEM (science, technology, engineering, and math) fields and other areas conducive to careers traditionally pursued by men is the key that could unlock the earning power of women.

I think NEO will be a very good platform on which many other technologies will be built on and am bullish on it.

I read all the whitepapers of ICOs that I participate it, I think you should at least have a little knowledge of the ICO

Yeah and it already did over the past ~2 days, superb performance

Maybe a kind of voting system would work as well? That's assuming that the majority of people do not want a nuclear war to happen... I tend to think of the possibility of a war happening only due to the ego of a politician being challenged.

Definitely better to invest if you do not see yourself needing the money in the near future. If history is any gauge, it always outperforms saving.