|
181
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Dash price consolidates following a significant correction
|
on: March 05, 2017, 03:26:01 AM
|
I can't believe how much blatant lying there has been over the price of Dash in the scene lately.
I just looked now and it's $48.21
Soooo.. uhhhh... what now ? LOL
I'm somewhat disappointed that it stopped there. I really thought it was going for $300 or so right away. With their 10 coins in circulation, that shouldn't be too difficult now, should it ? Sorry about that miscommunication, but the $300 target is set for after implementing the Dash Evolution update end 2017 .. not before. Link about Dash Evolution : https://www.dash.org/evolution/Oops. I thought that Evolution was meant to solve bitcoin's problems. But to overtake it, you should aim for $3000 at least. $300 was to overtake ethereum. No, seriously, I would love to see DASH overtake ethereum. I would also love to see it overtake bitcoin If Dash did that then it would probably get as much mainstream attention as bitcoin. Can you imagine the negative press around the instamine? I've often said I've been bullish on Dash because of the limited supply, but I'm not sure how it will go if an adversarial media scrutinises it |
|
|
|
|
183
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] AEON [2017-02-24: important update to 0.9.7.1]
|
on: March 04, 2017, 09:43:10 PM
|
Hello guys, I believe you are experts here so can you help me answer some questions?  1, In what category is the coin first? In what category Aeon promotes itself? Crytonote 2, What new features Aeon brings? How is it unique? It has some differences to XMR. 3, Are promises kept by devs? Yes, though the dev/s don't make any silly ones 4, Are features on roadmap delivered regularly? It seems to be a slow and steady progress. I like this coin because 1.Slowly and surely the community is growing, and more people are contributing. It is becoming a community project 2.There isn't too much hype, but things are happening 3.The launch was fair. No premine. No ICO. Just POW. 4.The lead developer is a Monero core dev. He has a good reputation and is a steady character imho. 5.The lead developer has set aside a fund for future development (or to help the project or community). Some of this was donations from the community. 6.It already has a wallet at Poloniex, as it traded there a while ago |
|
|
|
|
186
|
Economy / Exchanges / Re: [Exchange] Liqui - trade and earn 24 APR on BTC, ETH
|
on: March 01, 2017, 08:57:01 AM
|
Hello to Liqui creators. Thank you for you website and project. A couple of ideas to improve things. 1.When I checked my account balance for TIME, I could not find a way to get back to the exchange section. there are other things...but méh. I would appreciate that one. |
|
|
|
|
191
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][BITLATTICE] A Revolutionary Step - Bitlattice.org
|
on: February 26, 2017, 03:09:24 AM
|
Thank you, but TBH, I still don't understand what that is.
In a blockchain, the new block refers back to the previous block, but in bitlattice the new block refers back to.......what?
It can be a new block in a new chain! What does that block refer back to? Are new chains being created that do not need to refer back to their original roots? Is this anything like the slicing that HEAT is looking to do? Or anything like Byteball? Forgive my interruption of your discuss... First - not blocks, I call it nodes (because they differ from what is called blocks in blockchain). Thank you. Now, I know what a block is. And a block must contain information. It's pedigree, and cryptographic information etc.... But what information is in a Bitlattice node? Each node contains combined hash and time of insertion? And this enables it (with the help of other nodes) to verify later information that is added? Is this like Byteball then? |
|
|
|
|
192
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][BITLATTICE] A Revolutionary Step - Bitlattice.org
|
on: February 26, 2017, 01:10:23 AM
|
Thank you, but TBH, I still don't understand what that is.
In a blockchain, the new block refers back to the previous block, but in bitlattice the new block refers back to.......what?
It can be a new block in a new chain! What does that block refer back to? Are new chains being created that do not need to refer back to their original roots? Is this anything like the slicing that HEAT is looking to do? Or anything like Byteball? |
|
|
|
|
193
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][BITLATTICE] A Revolutionary Step - Bitlattice.org
|
on: February 26, 2017, 12:51:15 AM
|
So..a blockchain is a chain of blocks. But Bitlatice is not a blockchain. So what is is?
Does it have blocks of information that get verified?
Can you explain a little more what the "lattice"is. It's not clear.
Thanks
In the present scheme of blockchain there is no possibility to perform more than two operations at once, stemming from the fact that every next blocks depends on the previous. Of course this is mitigated by packing multiple transactions into one block and hashing them collectively. But it’s far from concurrency, rather it’s just a way to deal with this very limited structure. In lattice things are different. There are multiple root points that are referred to from the main root. It resembles child chains in some applications, but is very different on the basic level of functionality.
With lattice, many operations can be performed at the same moment in time by different miners/processing units. And still the whole structure will retain integrity. Because clusters can but usually won’t overlap.
I think this can help you  Thank you, but TBH, I still don't understand what that is. In a blockchain, the new block refers back to the previous block, but in bitlattice the new block refers back to.......what? |
|
|
|
|
196
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 ChronoBank ICO is over! 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟
|
on: February 25, 2017, 08:16:14 PM
|
Not a valid ERC-20 token - the message received, what does it mean ?
I received this error message too first time I tried. I had entered my ether address and you may have as well. Make sure you use the Time contract address as shown above: TIME contract address: 0x6531f133e6deebe7f2dce5a0441aa7ef330b4e53 Then it should work for you. ok i see...I was worried i would send to the wrong address |
|
|
|
|
199
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 ChronoBank ICO is over! 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟
|
on: February 25, 2017, 02:31:12 AM
|
i guess they are now starting to create excuses and now won't send the bounties. they will soon announce the distribution may happen next month. and then next month will be another announcement to which they will postpone again. good luck to all who invested again. till all will be forgotten.
How are you so sure about this? tomorrow is the day for official announcement i am sure. who would have thought of "Cloudbleed vulnerability" as a reason to postponed the distribution. like the rest of the ICO, they are all going to be holding your coins forever until they figure to bewilder you and forget all about distributing. and you will still faithfully wait for it. of course you can't curse them at the top of your lungs because o well you still have to beg for them to send it to you.
If you changed your password and confirmed your withdrawal address, Cloudbleed is not a danger to you!
Make it ASAP!!! We want to distribute tokens today!!!
https://blog.chronobank.io/instruction-to-withdraw-time-tokens-5a87ded49a17
WTF is this all about? Is there somewhere you explain this? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
