Bitcoin Forum
May 07, 2024, 08:12:03 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2 3 »
1  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Problem starting maxcoin wallet - debian wheezy on: February 07, 2014, 12:30:27 AM
Quote
:~/clients-master/Maxcoin-linux64$ ./maxcoin-qt
./maxcoin-qt: error while loading shared libraries: libminiupnpc.so.8: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory

Can I run the maxcoin wallet under debian wheezy?
Do I need to install a package to get this to work?
2  Economy / Services / Re: Melbourne cafe accepting btc on: January 12, 2014, 04:17:21 AM
Cool I'll check it out one day.  Grin
3  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Bitcoin will be felled by regulation: Kerr Neilson on: January 10, 2014, 04:07:46 AM
http://www.smh.com.au/business/markets/bitcoin-will-be-felled-by-regulation-kerr-neilson-20140110-30ljr.html

The article raises several questions:

What's a global regulator? Is Australia a sovereign state or not?
4  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Why Did The Chinese Government Crack Down On Bitcoin? on: December 31, 2013, 02:43:11 AM
Watching trading closely with the BTCChina.com price movement, and knowing Chinese culture, where corruption and well positioned networks taking care of theselves isn't really considered corrupt like we in the West think, I think there is little doubt that the very Government officials who banned deposits onto the exchanges are themselves getting Yuan on the exchanges. Even if they aren't getting their own deposits on right now, the Chinese population assumes that's what's happening.  It's just the accepted way their economy and culture works, it's considered normal.

BTC made a $120 move in under 48 hours centering on Christmas day when all Western banks are closed. This move was clearly led by China. How do they do that when no new money is allowed on the exchange?

There is $15 Trillion in new money created in China over the last 5 years. You can see that it hasn't been too hard to get the money out if you go to my cities of Sydney and Vancouver. But surely there are many more billion$ to get out of China, enter bitcoin. They will be buying for a long time to come, and will be a big part of the run to $5000 and beyond.

What you say makes a lot of sense; cronyism and tribalism will never be eliminated and this is why we need to limit the power of government -- to minimize the pernicious effects of the misuse of state power.
5  Economy / Economics / Re: Strange. on: December 26, 2013, 11:16:58 PM
This is almost certainly malware. Delete it.
6  Economy / Speculation / Re: I've cashed out but this is not the end. on: December 26, 2013, 07:57:17 PM
There's a strong apparent upswing occurring on all charts; if think we've seen this bottom. I'm back in!

By taking this step unfortunately I have lost some bitcoin.

you mean you sat on too much fiat too long Smiley

Correct. Mr Market is waking up to how unsound fiat currency is and is demanding an alternative.
7  Economy / Speculation / Re: I've cashed out but this is not the end. on: December 26, 2013, 07:36:05 PM
There's a strong apparent upswing occurring on all charts; if think we've seen this bottom. I'm back in!

By taking this step unfortunately I have lost some bitcoin.
8  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Why Did The Chinese Government Crack Down On Bitcoin? on: December 25, 2013, 12:49:45 PM
The Renminbi is rapidly growing as an international currency. It recently came into the top 8 or 10 of most used trade currencies. The government of China's priority lies in promoting the renminbi not bitcoin. Bitcoin is facilitating capital flight from China. Why would they allow it? You are going to see a clampdown on bitcoin in all developing countries.

The only countries that stand to benefit from bitcoin are, ironically, financial centers. That's right! Places where bankers rule is where bitcoin is being welcomed the most. Consider Switzerland, Singapore and Germany. These countries are adopting bitcoin because they see it as a threat and it is essential for their survival that they play along. The only exception to this are the USA, because they want to preserve the role of the dollar, and the UK. I imagine the British are just following the Americans in this. Got to preserve that special relationship!

Makes sense.
9  Other / Politics & Society / Why Did The Chinese Government Crack Down On Bitcoin? on: December 25, 2013, 10:55:20 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JP9-lAYngi4&feature=youtube_gdata_player

In this discussion (3 min from the end) Andreas Antonopoulos suggests that the Chinese government should be in favour of bitcoin because it will provide an alternative reserve currency to the currency of its foe, the US government.

If this is true (and I'm not saying it is) but if true why would the Chinese government crack down on bitcoin?

Could the US government have applied diplomatic pressure on the Chinese government to force them to crack down on bitcoin?
10  Other / Off-topic / Re: NSA payed RSA to install faulty backdoor encryption on: December 25, 2013, 08:12:18 AM
The web site is back up, fascinating article. Despicable conduct by the "folks" at the NSA and I'm glad their scam has been exposed thanks to the genius and heroism of Edward Snowden.

ya, It's really incredible that they are running this enormous scam right under the public's noses.  I had even stated on here a number of months ago that our crypto standards are sabotaged by the NSA, the general response from the people on here was that this was a nonsense 'conspiracy theory'.

The real story is starting to come to light, that the field of cryptography is something like a scientific con game.

But what to do?

Having studied computer science I can tell you that cryptography is not a con. Strong encryption is entirely possible; just need to be wary of backdoors.

As to what you can do: Hire a trusted programmer to write your own cryptography application.

Any idea how much something like TrueCrypt would cost to write from scratch? Wink

A smart uni student should be able to bash out an implementation of one of the many encryption open standards in a few months. It just wouldn't have all the fancy (yet useless) "bells and whistles" one get with commercial software.
11  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: What are the most convincing arguments against Bitcoin? on: December 25, 2013, 08:03:27 AM
1. Buying goods with Bitcoin decreases value as merchants immediately cash out.  New money doesn't flow into falling prices of Bitcoin.

I know a merchants that don't cash out.

2. Numbers aren't easily digestible.  Ever pay 0.004994321 BTC for a loaf of bread?

0.004994321 BTC = 499,432.10 μBTC and what's and easier way of representing $499,432.10?

3. BTC is not deflationary.  Altcoins such as LTC extend the supply if adopted.

Whether or not BTC is deflationary will be determined by the market for altcoins. Capital may be mostly attracted to BTC and if BTC proves itself to be technically sound it will stay there.
12  Other / Off-topic / Re: NSA payed RSA to install faulty backdoor encryption on: December 25, 2013, 07:48:39 AM
The web site is back up, fascinating article. Despicable conduct by the "folks" at the NSA and I'm glad their scam has been exposed thanks to the genius and heroism of Edward Snowden.

ya, It's really incredible that they are running this enormous scam right under the public's noses.  I had even stated on here a number of months ago that our crypto standards are sabotaged by the NSA, the general response from the people on here was that this was a nonsense 'conspiracy theory'.

The real story is starting to come to light, that the field of cryptography is something like a scientific con game.

But what to do?

Having studied computer science I can tell you that cryptography is not a con. Strong encryption is entirely possible; just need to be wary of backdoors.

As to what you can do: Hire a trusted programmer to write your own cryptography application.
13  Other / Off-topic / Re: NSA payed RSA to install faulty backdoor encryption on: December 24, 2013, 11:24:44 PM
The web site is back up, fascinating article. Despicable conduct by the "folks" at the NSA and I'm glad their scam has been exposed thanks to the genius and heroism of Edward Snowden.
14  Other / Off-topic / Re: NSA payed RSA to install faulty backdoor encryption on: December 24, 2013, 10:49:09 PM

http://www.altchain.org/?q=content/nsa-payed-rsa-install-faulty-encryption

Quote
As a key part of a campaign to embed encryption software that it could crack into widely used computer products, the U.S. National Security Agency arranged a secret $10 million contract with RSA, one of the most influential firms in the computer security industry, Reuters has learned.

This has been discussed in other threads already.

Can you provide a link to back up that claim?

hey David,

 unfortunately the altchain.org site was hacked recently so that link no longer works.  ASMOF, it was hacked not long after that link was posted.

 seems you are new here, most of of the people posting here are running cheap scams and take offense when anyone takes attention away from them for a moment.  There is at least one person posting to this thread on my ignore list.  I can't even imagine how someone could possibly read this forum without an extensive block list because a good 80+% of the posts are useless, distractions, scams, etc.

-bm


Thanks blue,

Yep I'm starting to get the impression. If you know of any other bitcoin/anarcho-capitalist forums not infested with trolls pm me.

15  Other / Off-topic / Re: NSA payed RSA to install faulty backdoor encryption on: December 24, 2013, 05:44:58 AM

http://www.altchain.org/?q=content/nsa-payed-rsa-install-faulty-encryption

Quote
As a key part of a campaign to embed encryption software that it could crack into widely used computer products, the U.S. National Security Agency arranged a secret $10 million contract with RSA, one of the most influential firms in the computer security industry, Reuters has learned.

This has been discussed in other threads already.

Can you provide a link to back up that claim?
16  Economy / Economics / Re: Sound Money Definition on: December 23, 2013, 08:27:45 PM
can we merge these "is bitcoin money? / what is currency?" threads into one big one? this is getting ridiculous

edit: I pm'd a mod


Why would you want to do that?

The question of whether of not bitcoin is money and what is "sound money" are two different questions and warrant their own thread.
17  Economy / Economics / Re: Sound Money Definition on: December 23, 2013, 06:50:07 AM
Feel free to redefine "sound money" to take into account bitcoin.

Redefine it from what?


But honestly, I don't hear the phrase "sound money" that much, where do you keep hearing it?


Really? Do you only read mainstream media finance articles?

The phrase is used a lot in the Daily Reckoning for example:

http://dailyreckoning.com/why-the-feds-really-hate-sound-money/

18  Economy / Economics / Re: Sound Money Definition on: December 23, 2013, 06:02:25 AM
I was hoping for a definition that says something like:

sound money is a currency that cannot be debased or counterfeited...

Modern economic definitions have not quite caught up yet with redefining everything in terms of bitcoin.

I strongly suspect you are right about that.
19  Economy / Economics / Re: Sound Money Definition on: December 23, 2013, 04:35:20 AM
I googled it for you and got back:

"Sound money is a phrase technically synonymous with a currency backed by or pegged to some good or commodity. It can also mean a currency that is not rapidly inflating or deflating in value. As even the technical definition is rather fuzzy, in reality, it's often synonymous with whatever economic woo its promoter is hyping. Sound money is often a cover for gold buggery, though it can mean whatever the hell the bullshit purveyor wants it to mean."

Did you get that from here?

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Sound_money

Seems like a very biased article. For example does sound money really need to be "backed by or pegged to some good or commodity".

In my view that article isn't very credible at all; seems more like propaganda.

I was hoping for a definition that says something like:

sound money is a currency that cannot be debased or counterfeited...


20  Economy / Economics / Sound Money Definition on: December 23, 2013, 03:07:22 AM
One sees "sound money" being talked about a lot on the interwebs; but what is the definition of "sound money"?
Pages: [1] 2 3 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!