What do I need to do to participate in this bounty campaign?
Well, first you need to decide which campaign you want to participate in. These can be signatures, articles, social networks, etc. Then you need to fill in the appropriate form and follow all the terms of the selected campaign. Can I participate in several bounty campaigns? For example, deal with translations and also participate in a campaign with signatures. Is it allowed by the rules? |
|
|
|
|
What do I need to do to participate in this bounty campaign?
|
|
|
|
|
I'm very interested in how this project will bring profit to its creators, as the team plans to coin it.
|
|
|
|
When is the project to be launched? is there an approximate date for this?
Well, if you look at the road map, then the beta version of the first revision of the DML protocol is planned in July-August 2018 Can we say that it will be an open and accessible beta version for everyone? Or will it be some kind of closed test? I do not think that it will be a closed test of the system. Because all the closed tests do not make sense to publicly disclose. Most likely it will be public access to the platform, and all the closed tests will not be covered in the road map. But in any case, in order to have access to this platform, I need to have a certain balance of tokens, right? Well, naturally yes, it is. without them you can not be part of the system and have access to it But how exactly can I get these tokens. Just on the website, I did not find a link or an address to which I could transfer my investment. and in general I do not really understand how to do it. |
|
|
|
When is the project to be launched? is there an approximate date for this?
Well, if you look at the road map, then the beta version of the first revision of the DML protocol is planned in July-August 2018 Can we say that it will be an open and accessible beta version for everyone? Or will it be some kind of closed test? I do not think that it will be a closed test of the system. Because all the closed tests do not make sense to publicly disclose. Most likely it will be public access to the platform, and all the closed tests will not be covered in the road map. But in any case, in order to have access to this platform, I need to have a certain balance of tokens, right? |
|
|
|
When is the project to be launched? is there an approximate date for this?
Well, if you look at the road map, then the beta version of the first revision of the DML protocol is planned in July-August 2018 Can we say that it will be an open and accessible beta version for everyone? Or will it be some kind of closed test? |
|
|
|
My opinion is that large traders will not go to those marketplaces where they trade for more than one year. The level of trust in the new platform will always be lower
My opinion is that large traders will not go to those marketplaces where they trade for more than one year. The level of trust in the new platform will always be lower If you had a huge amount of money in cryptocurrency, would you trust them with an absolutely new platform that has not proved itself yet? Your arguments are absolutely not reasoned, you, as the miser continues to grumble, and to prove that all new projects including this one no future and the developers are not able to implement it. I do not argue how to assure us the developers of the project will be really innovative in the field of cryptocurrency trading and has many advantages. I just wanted to say that no big traders will jump from Bittrex or Kraken to LocalCoinSwap. Kraken is the oldest exchange, one of the first cryptocurrency exchanges, there are very few trading pairs .As for Bittrex, there are of course more pairs,but there are constantly introducing some prohibitions to users of other countries, and the reset of all orders that are not closed for more than a month is generally no good. And you can consider the exchange endlessly, each has certain disadvantages that prevent traders from working. |
|
|
|
|
When is the project to be launched? is there an approximate date for this?
|
|
|
|
My opinion is that large traders will not go to those marketplaces where they trade for more than one year. The level of trust in the new platform will always be lower
My opinion is that large traders will not go to those marketplaces where they trade for more than one year. The level of trust in the new platform will always be lower If you had a huge amount of money in cryptocurrency, would you trust them with an absolutely new platform that has not proved itself yet? Your arguments are absolutely not reasoned, you, as the miser continues to grumble, and to prove that all new projects including this one no future and the developers are not able to implement it. |
|
|
|
My opinion is that large traders will not go to those marketplaces where they trade for more than one year. The level of trust in the new platform will always be lower
My opinion is that large traders will not go to those marketplaces where they trade for more than one year. The level of trust in the new platform will always be lower |
|
|
|
Do I understand correctly. every month on the 18th a document or report will be published that will contain some kind of information, right? What kind of information is this?
Well, because EPS tokens can freely move between different ethereum addresses. That's why the report will be formed. which will take into account all these changes. Well, as I understand it will work this way. |
|
|
|
I would like to ask. Does this project have no competition? After all, there are many similar services and platforms on the market. What exactly is this platform different from the others?
There is always competition, it's true. But if the project offers better conditions than competitors, then this project wins. Everything is simple  So what are the advantages that Ufoodo can boast to its competitors? Well, for example, this is the first project from this sphere of business that is implemented on the platform of blockchain. I did not see any other similar projects at least. And as this service does not charge a large percentage of the commission both from restaurants and from users, it is beneficial for both parties. |
|
|
|
I would like to ask. Does this project have no competition? After all, there are many similar services and platforms on the market. What exactly is this platform different from the others?
There is always competition, it's true. But if the project offers better conditions than competitors, then this project wins. Everything is simple |
|
|
|
Does someone know what is going on with sales?
The 2nd stage is live. Unfortunately it will end soon. It will last 3 days more. Price will rise, and the bonus will be not as advantageous as it is now. What do you can tell about the bonus? They offer 30% discount. Also the token price is not very high. Only $0.021. I think it is better to hurry up if you want to catch your lucky moment.  Yep. You are right. I can’t wait to fully use Cultural places. It is a wonderful alternative, because in Europe there are very high price for every touristic place. I agree with you. Most of this money will get touristic agencies, but not the institutions. Institutions can use these resources for their development. |
|
|
|
Does someone know what is going on with sales?
The 2nd stage is live. Unfortunately it will end soon. It will last 3 days more. Price will rise, and the bonus will be not as advantageous as it is now. What do you can tell about the bonus? They offer 30% discount. Also the token price is not very high. Only $0.021. I think it is better to hurry up if you want to catch your lucky moment. |
|
|
|
Does someone know what is going on with sales?
The 2nd stage is live. Unfortunately it will end soon. It will last 3 days more. Price will rise, and the bonus will be not as advantageous as it is now. |
|
|
|
The idea is so great. I believe it will be in demand all over the world. It is useful for everyone. Besides, when the project is united with blockchain and other technologies, it is really promising.
Yes, I think it is right. Blockchain offers security and convenience. Tourism always is a reclaimed industry |
|
|
|
Hey there. Who knows what standard will use Cultural Places? Do they use ethereum or something else?
They are using erc721. It is a new standard that would allow smart contracts to operate as tradeable tokens similar to ERC20. ERC721 tokens are unique in that the tokens are non-fungible. I found this info on their official website. Actually where did you found this information on their website. I only read, that they use tokes with ERC20. And as I am asking....whats the big difference to ERC20? Or better, what do you mean with "non-fungible" exactly? (I am still a newbie in this area with smart contracts....sorry for the question  ) This info you can find in their white paper. The difference is that erc721 gives you ability to add extra parameters (e.g. different price tags) This is written in the glossary on the website: Ethereum Request for Comments 721, or ERC721, is an Ethereum Improvement Proposal introduced by Dieter Shirley in late 2017. It’s a proposed* standard that would allow smart contracts to operate as tradeable tokens similar to ERC20. |
|
|
|
I have a question about using bot. Will the users be able to begin use the bot when they want? Will it be somehow limited?
No, it won’t be limited. You will be able to start or finish using the wallet when you want it. Besides, the aBOT will run on up to 50 exchanges, so it will be good for users too. Also they will launch a mBOT in May. |
|
|
|
If this project is for github, can we say that it will be an open source project?
Of course. This is even written in white paper. Hmm...  And what is it for? Well, that is an open source project. And the project is of such high complexity. Why did they choose this option? Because the team wants to attract as many users as possible to audit its platform, as well as implement various improvements and changes. But is this not going to affect the overall stability of the system? I mean changes. which will be made by users who do not have sufficient knowledge in this area. Will not this damage the overall stability of the system? Actually it does not work that way. You understand, after every change you make it is separated into a separate branch for development. These are the features of the work of such repositories as githab. So on the stability of the system this will not have any effect. In this case, I fully support such a decision. Some users really can greatly improve this product I believe. I hope that this will also be encouraged by the system in the form of additional tokens, as far as I know, so it will be. By the way, I did not think about it at once. Yes, such work should be encouraged, otherwise what's the point of doing this. For the sake of enthusiasm? Somehow it looks dubious. So the promotion in the form of tokens looks very nice! Yes, I totally agree, it remains only to find out exactly what amounts of promotion can be discussed  |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
