Considering if it was someone with dark green trust
But that's not the case. I don't know why you even mentioned this. Do you know whom we're talking about?
His account was already red thanks to KWH so me granting a few days for him to explain didn't make any difference in that sense.
Even if he replies and has substantial amount of proof he is not guilty,the feedback should stay as a warning.
What? If he proves he's not guilty then it wouldn't make any sense to leave negative feedback as a warning :/
But everything seems to show he is indeed guilty.
thanks for the support as I see coinman has been connected today and said nothing