125
|
Other / Off-topic / Re: First bitcoin related suicide?
|
on: January 29, 2014, 01:56:17 AM
|
Praying for you man.
~Isaiah 41:10 So do not fear, for I am with you; do not be dismayed, for I am your God. I will strengthen you and help you; I will uphold you with my righteous right hand.
Belief in God/Heaven and Jesus just encourages suicide. Don't encourage him. Seeing the fibonacci sequence in nature helps me realize we were created by intelligent design. From flowers, sea shells, spider webs, oak trees, pinecones, pineapples, all the way to galaxies. AWESOME! Yep! I like you (: I like you all, and I know what you are talking about. I think that, perhaps everyone will, in time. It is generally futile to speak about things ineffable to those who haven't the ears to hear them. The Universe is unfolding as it should; there is not a grain of sand out of place!
|
|
|
126
|
Other / Off-topic / Re: First bitcoin related suicide?
|
on: January 29, 2014, 12:50:25 AM
|
Pretty sure Atlas and dank tried this one before, so nope, not the first.
I know for a fact Atlas did actually follow through.... If so, I am really sorry to hear that. Also, cheer up, OP.
|
|
|
127
|
Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Personal responsibility and inept Bitcoin jesusing
|
on: January 28, 2014, 11:04:58 PM
|
This article is the logical continuation of the older Personal responsiblity and the Ponzi scam offering. Odds are you're too new to have read that back in the day. Once you're done here go there and catch up.Acts have consequences. Not some of them, not those which you wish to have consequences, not even those which you accept or aquiesce may have consequences. All of them. Each and every last one of them. Those consequences aren't limited to what you find acceptable, at the time you act or at any later time. Those consequences aren't limited to what you find conceivable, with your dimwitted thinker, nor to what you find "should have been conceivable" in retrospect. The entire array of consequences is available at all times upon all your actions and inactions. With or without your agreement, approval or intent. So, when you promote some random 24 yo schmuck as if he has something to say about Bitcoin, you are opening yourself to one day reading in the newspaper that Put this arrest right above Dogecoin and Coinye West on the list of reasons why Bitcoin is the Jonah Hill in The Wolf of Wall Street of currency: no matter how much they strive to be taken seriously, the Bitcoin community remains a punch line. As if Bitcoin strives to be taken seriously by the general fuckwittery. As if that's what we're all about, renting a coupla rustbuckets to put vanity plates on them. As if this shit is has anything to do with Bitcoin at all. As if anyone cares. When you promote some random scam with foundational delusions as in any way relevant, when you interact with it as anything other than a laughingstock, what you get is what anyone with two brains'd expect. You get to read bullshit like As merchants embrace Bitcoin, digital currency still struggles for regulatory approval worldwide As if we give a kernel of a shit, joint or several, whether self-proclaimed "regulators" approve or don't approve. The issue is whether Bitcoin will approve any regulator and which exactly, not whether some obscure bureaucrat somewhere thinks it proper for the Sun to come out tomorrow. So then: time to rethink your defective mental processes. Stop promoting things on the grounds that they seem, superficially, "right". Some kid having a nice smile, which Shrem does have, is no fucking basis to pretend like he may be publicly associated with Bitcoin. The basis would be someone who can actually fight back when the going gets tough, that's who you want to look up to. The basis would be someone who actually has the foresight to avoid ridiculous tarpits a la "hi guise, I r order fake passports to my home address because totally people send you fake passports with your motherfucking face on them as a prank all the time". So far you're batting 0-9 or some shit. You thought Dread Pirate Roberts was Mr. Bitcoin, turns out he was a schmucky 20something with shocking mental disability. Shocking mental disability that nevertheless somehow passed unnoticed by you. Why is that? You thought Roger Ver was Mr. Bitcoin, turns out he's some guy with a serious problem over fifty missing dollars. You thought Charlie Shrem was Mr. Bitcoin, turns out he's a clueless kid made of papier mache. They don't even need to be trying too hard. Karpeles signed paperwork that's actually false and enough to get him indicted, Vessenes is in so deep with all the piles upon piles of fraud in his venture he's not even worth going after (yet). You still think Michael Asshole Hearn is somehow relevant for Bitcoin, notwithstanding he's yet to do a single thing that wouldn't be exactly вредительство. What, he accidentally fucked up the code by implementing massive changes without reading, is it? Nearly crushed Bitcoin last year, and in the process provided "accidentally", of course, invaluable stress testing data to all enemies? Not one single pick you've made was correct. It's not even that you're picking anyone that's in the race, you're roughly in the position of someone whose picks for the NFL season aren't even playing in the NFL, aren't even athletes, aren't even citizens, aren't even human and aren't even all animate. A kitchen sink, a wet noodle, some nesting birds, a dead tapeworm, that's your NFL picks. You're George, dear Bitcoin community, of It became very clear to me sitting out there today, that every decision I've ever made, in my entire life, has been wrong. My life is the complete opposite of everything I want it to be. Every instinct I have, in every of aspect of life, be it something to wear, something to eat ... It's all been wrong. (chuckles) Everywhere. That's you. You're George. Bear that in mind. I will admit that historically, I have not liked you very much. This is simply because you, by and large, do not come across as a tremendously likeable person. Your post, however, couldn't help but raise my opinion of you somewhat. Dammit, I think I kinda like ya now. Keep on keepin' on! Jesus Christ. I'm not even OP's fan in general, but I think it's pretty obvious what her point was. The fact that 95% of you fucking retards can't pick up on that just further illustrates her point.
^^^ This.
|
|
|
128
|
Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin client and website translation
|
on: January 28, 2014, 10:48:12 PM
|
I realize that this thread is a tad old, but the OP is a pretty cool cat so perhaps the membership will let it slide.
How might I go about contributing to the translation of the Bitcoin-QT client?
Bitmono meritas esperantan tradukon!
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/translation_process.mdOr if that seems hard just make the translations in a spreadsheet or text file or your format of choice, and someone will probably help you. Thanks! However, I have managed to become part of the team here: https://www.transifex.com/projects/p/bitcoinorg/ (as a matter of fact, for bitcoin.org, I *am* the Esperanto translation team, do, helpu min esperantistoj!) I am also the only one on https://www.transifex.com/organizations/dashboard/bitcoin-wallet so help is needed there as well to review my translations for the Android bitcoin client. I'm also helping those who were already working on the Esperanto translation of the Satoshi client, but I am sure, ke samideanoj estus bonvenaj. https://www.transifex.com/organizations/dashboard/bitcoin
|
|
|
130
|
Local / Other languages/locations / Re: Esperanto
|
on: January 22, 2014, 05:01:45 PM
|
el https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=423672.msg4611341#msg4611341Se vi povas legi ĉi tiun, mi bezonas vian helpon!Mi tradukis "Bitcoin Wallet for Android" (mi nomis ĝin "BitmonMonujo" en mia traduko), sed mi bezonas iun por relegi, kaj korekti mian tradukon uzante la retejo "transifex.com". Fakte, laŭ la retejo, mi bezonas du personojn.
https://www.transifex.com/projects/p/bitcoin-wallet/
Se vi povas legi ĉi tiun, vi povas helpi la verdan lingvon kaj ankaŭ Bitmonon se vi preni iom da tempo por korekti kaj provlegi mian tradukon.
Kiam vi finis, vi ankaŭ povas helpi mian tradukon de "bitcoin.org", se vi povas kaj volas.
https://www.transifex.com/projects/p/bitcoinorg/
Multan dankon!
|
|
|
131
|
Local / Other languages/locations / Se vi povas legi ĉi tiun, mi bezonas vian helpon!
|
on: January 20, 2014, 02:13:37 AM
|
Mi tradukis "Bitcoin Wallet for Android" (mi nomis ĝin "BitmonMonujo" en mia traduko), sed mi bezonas iun por relegi, kaj korekti mian tradukon uzante la retejo "transifex.com". Fakte, laŭ la retejo, mi bezonas du personojn.
https://www.transifex.com/projects/p/bitcoin-wallet/
Se vi povas legi ĉi tiun, vi povas helpi la verdan lingvon kaj ankaŭ Bitmonon se vi preni iom da tempo por korekti kaj provlegi mian tradukon.
Kiam vi finis, vi ankaŭ povas helpi mian tradukon de "bitcoin.org", se vi povas kaj volas.
https://www.transifex.com/projects/p/bitcoinorg/
Multan dankon!
|
|
|
133
|
Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Who gets my transaction fee ?
|
on: January 15, 2014, 08:36:55 PM
|
Who gets my transaction fee ? The miner/mining pool who included my transaction in a block he/she/they mined ?
Yup Does not the miner gets 25 BTC again for finding each block or these transaction fees actually sum up to that 25 BTC ? The fees are separate from the the 25 BTC block reward. The block reward is actually a subsidy to incentivize miners to mine in the early days of the network, as well as being a structured, predictable source of "new money".
|
|
|
134
|
Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin client and website translation
|
on: January 15, 2014, 07:42:36 PM
|
I realize that this thread is a tad old, but the OP is a pretty cool cat so perhaps the membership will let it slide.
How might I go about contributing to the translation of the Bitcoin-QT client?
Bitmono meritas esperantan tradukon!
|
|
|
137
|
Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Gavin will visit the Council on Foreign Relations
|
on: January 14, 2014, 08:43:07 PM
|
Edit: We have got a bit off topic. I personally do not mind Gavin going to the meeting. I find it interesting that they want to talk with him. However I do find it a bit odd that the Bitcoin Foundation is a police service. Pretty shocked honestly and wonder if that was their goal the whole time. Seems they want control control control in every way.
I find it infuriating and insulting that the Bitcoin Foundation is all down with fight the crime of 'child exploitation', but has not done jack shit to find 'TradeFortress' who paid them. Child exploitation is a heinous crime and I'd love to see all guilty parties castrated. Literally. All ten of them plus the dozens who are employed by the US as mercenaries. It, like 'terrorism', is simply not a large problem but are invariably used just to get a foot in the door. Scum like TF abound and they are definitely the low hanging fruit in terms of fighting problems in the economy. As for presenting at the CFR I'm all for it, but it should be done from a reasonably well deserved position of strength. It should be easy and completely justifiable to say "Look, Bitcoin derives it's strength from being an open project that the community supports, and that support comes, in part, from transparency. We don't do private opaque meetings." Unfortunately the Bitcoin Foundation threw that out the window from pretty much day one. There are a lot of good reasons to not grovel before 'the powers that be' and it has nothing to do with some sort of machismo. It has to do with principle and mechanics because operationally it will be easier to do the right thing by being polite and accommodating of reasonable requests, but also firm, separate, and operating with a defensive posture. Agreed.
|
|
|
|