Bitcoin Forum
January 19, 2022, 11:47:10 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 22.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2 »
1  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: CRYPTSY stopping withdraw locking accounts without notifying users! Class Action on: December 19, 2015, 03:13:34 PM
As of today, how to leave cryptsy ?
I know BTC withdraw doesn't work...


 Doge work, but you lost about 35%

Ok. This is the best option ?

I got mine off of there using ETH, but that was last month.  Buy a tiny amount and see if you can withdraw it.

Yes I could do that but the fees each time of testing...
2  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: CRYPTSY stopping withdraw locking accounts without notifying users! Class Action on: December 19, 2015, 03:04:16 PM
As of today, how to leave cryptsy ?
I know BTC withdraw doesn't work...


 Doge work, but you lost about 35%

Ok. This is the best option ?
3  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: CRYPTSY stopping withdraw locking accounts without notifying users! Class Action on: December 19, 2015, 02:56:23 PM
As of today, how to leave cryptsy ?
I know BTC withdraw doesn't work...
4  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: CRYPTSY stopping withdraw locking accounts without notifying users! Class Action on: December 02, 2015, 09:06:34 PM
I am adding my +1 to this topic as Cryptsy doesn't let me withdraw.
It is marked as confirmed on Cryptsy side but nothing on the destination address as I can see in the btc blockchain.
It has been days I wait...
5  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] MemoryCoin | CPU Coin | Paid Dev Team | Limited Supply [MMC] on: March 22, 2014, 11:01:11 AM
I got with yam miner generic on linux 64bits :

--- SIGILL {si_signo=SIGILL, si_code=ILL_ILLOPN, si_addr=0x4dd9f4} ---
+++ killed by SIGILL (core dumped) +++
Illegal instruction (core dumped)

My cpu model name: Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU N2800   @ 1.86GHz

full :

Loading config file [../yam-mmc.cfg]
Miner version: yam M7n-linux64-generic/yvg1900
Checking target [getwork://ME8gb9Mwt3GdhyZ6K22t7xABF857pLxWBB@mmcpool.1gh.com:8080:8081:8082:8083/mmc]...
Target OK
Checking params [mmc:av=5&aesni=on&m=1024]...
Params OK
Checking MMC Stage 1 optimizations compatibility...
Checking MMC Stage 2 optimizations compatibility...
Illegal instruction (core dumped)

Any idea ?
6  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] cudaMiner - a new litecoin mining application [Windows/Linux] on: February 21, 2014, 12:18:28 PM
On Keccak (maxcoin) :

Getting GPU #0: NVS 300, 404.95 khash/s
For a NVS 300 (GT218).

Do you think it can do better ?
7  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / With low hashrates (old cpu and old legacy cuda card) on: February 18, 2014, 11:30:44 PM
With that in mind, what is the best way to still mine a little ? Max keccak ? Panda scrypt ?
How to be up to date with that ?

Because the multi auto switch pool have the difficulty to high to be profitable for low hashrate right ?
8  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] cudaMiner - a new litecoin mining application [Windows/Linux] on: February 18, 2014, 07:13:19 PM
Hi,

I have this card :
http://www.nvidia.com/object/product-nvs-300-us.html

It has 16 cuda core.

But I still don't get it.
I know I have to use the F for Fermy/Legacy flag, but for the blocks and warps I don't understand.

I tried 32x16 which is getting 5000khashs/s but result only in new stratum blocks detected and no accepted blocks neither refused.
How do you compute the best BxW for an legacy card like that ?

PS : I know it's a really bad card...
use the autotune: -lF (without any number, it should be fast with 16 cores)

autotune is not yet ready for keccak so I can't use this easy solution...
Are you really sure you want to mine maxcoin with your card ?
It won't be profitable at all... Even with my 780ti I gave up...
You should rather mine panda or utc (and autotune works...)

Are you saying that because I won't get any "accepted share" with this low hashrate ? If yes I will move to Pandacoin (I didn't heard about utccoin).
9  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] cudaMiner - a new litecoin mining application [Windows/Linux] on: February 18, 2014, 06:50:14 PM
Hi,

I have this card :
http://www.nvidia.com/object/product-nvs-300-us.html

It has 16 cuda core.

But I still don't get it.
I know I have to use the F for Fermy/Legacy flag, but for the blocks and warps I don't understand.

I tried 32x16 which is getting 5000khashs/s but result only in new stratum blocks detected and no accepted blocks neither refused.
How do you compute the best BxW for an legacy card like that ?

PS : I know it's a really bad card...
use the autotune: -lF (without any number, it should be fast with 16 cores)

autotune is not yet ready for keccak so I can't use this easy solution...
10  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] cudaMiner - a new litecoin mining application [Windows/Linux] on: February 18, 2014, 11:30:18 AM
Hi,

I have this card :
http://www.nvidia.com/object/product-nvs-300-us.html

It has 16 cuda core.

But I still don't get it.
I know I have to use the F for Fermy/Legacy flag, but for the blocks and warps I don't understand.

I tried 32x16 which is getting 5000khashs/s but result only in new stratum blocks detected and no accepted blocks neither refused.
How do you compute the best BxW for an legacy card like that ?

PS : I know it's a really bad card...
11  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [GTS218] NVIDIA NVS 300 with CudaMiner - blocks and warps compute on: February 18, 2014, 11:06:49 AM
Ok thanks. In fact it's for Maxcoin that I asked.
12  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [GTS218] NVIDIA NVS 300 with CudaMiner - blocks and warps compute on: February 18, 2014, 07:50:28 AM
Is the the good part of the forum to ask this kind of question ? I wonder.
13  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / [GTS218] NVIDIA NVS 300 with CudaMiner - blocks and warps compute on: February 18, 2014, 12:37:50 AM
Hi,

I have this card :
http://www.nvidia.com/object/product-nvs-300-us.html

It has 16 cuda core.

But I still don't get it.
I know I have to use the F for Fermy/Legacy flag, but for the blocks and warps I don't understand.

I tried 32x16 which is getting 5000khashs/s but result only in new stratum blocks detected and no accepted blocks neither refused.
How do you compute the best BxW for an legacy card like that ?
14  Bitcoin / Mining software (miners) / Re: What to choose for mining into a dedicated server using CPU ? on: February 08, 2014, 03:15:23 PM
This thread has a list of CPU mining coins. Yes, CPU mining is still alive.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=379601.0;topicseen

I mine SHA256, Scrypt and CPU coins.

I have dedicated SHA256 miners using ASIC. I also have 2 rigs which I use for scrypt and cpu mining. Why waste the electricity, since the GPU mining the computer needs to be on, might as well, mining CPU as well.


Yes that exactly what I was looking for.
Thanks !
15  Bitcoin / Mining software (miners) / Re: What to choose for mining into a dedicated server using CPU ? on: February 08, 2014, 12:44:13 AM
Each CPU coins have it's own dedicated minerd.exe

You need to find what you want to mine first. Then get that minerd.exe.

You don't do CPU mining using bfgminer or cgminer.

Tell us which CPU coins you want to mine, then we can suggest which miner you shoiuld use.

I'm using https://www.multipool.us/index.php with scrypt algo on my CPU and 4 threads.
My cmd line is : ./bfgminer -S cpu:auto --cpu-threads 4 --algo auto --scrypt --verbose -o stratum+tcp://eu.mul...

It's the usual, isn't it ?

It is useless to mine in mulitpool for scrypt coins using a CPU.

I am talking about these coins, which is design to be mine only by CPU.
http://vertcoin.org/
http://primecoin.org/
http://protoshares.com/
http://www.qrk.cc/

With only CPU, the above is your best options.

Ok thanks I will take a look on it.
Still, I can use bfgminer to mine on it ? Is it via a pool or solo mining ?

You can't use bfgminer, each one of the CPU coins have a dedicated minerd.exe

You need to search for which coin you want, then find the pool. There is always a link in the pool, which say Get Started.

This is where they tell you what miner you need, and you can download from that page.

I hope this helps.

But if you are mining Maxcoin, which only just released a few hours ago. There is a really good thread teaching how to mine that on the cloud.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=450539.0;topicseen



Thank you, I will give it a try.
That makes me confident about the fact that there is still coins that are worth to mine through CPU.
16  Bitcoin / Mining software (miners) / Re: What to choose for mining into a dedicated server using CPU ? on: February 06, 2014, 10:28:36 PM
Each CPU coins have it's own dedicated minerd.exe

You need to find what you want to mine first. Then get that minerd.exe.

You don't do CPU mining using bfgminer or cgminer.

Tell us which CPU coins you want to mine, then we can suggest which miner you shoiuld use.

I'm using https://www.multipool.us/index.php with scrypt algo on my CPU and 4 threads.
My cmd line is : ./bfgminer -S cpu:auto --cpu-threads 4 --algo auto --scrypt --verbose -o stratum+tcp://eu.mul...

It's the usual, isn't it ?

It is useless to mine in mulitpool for scrypt coins using a CPU.

I am talking about these coins, which is design to be mine only by CPU.
http://vertcoin.org/
http://primecoin.org/
http://protoshares.com/
http://www.qrk.cc/

With only CPU, the above is your best options.

Ok thanks I will take a look on it.
Still, I can use bfgminer to mine on it ? Is it via a pool or solo mining ?
17  Bitcoin / Mining software (miners) / Re: What to choose for mining into a dedicated server using CPU ? on: February 06, 2014, 07:50:57 PM
Each CPU coins have it's own dedicated minerd.exe

You need to find what you want to mine first. Then get that minerd.exe.

You don't do CPU mining using bfgminer or cgminer.

Tell us which CPU coins you want to mine, then we can suggest which miner you shoiuld use.

I'm using https://www.multipool.us/index.php with scrypt algo on my CPU and 4 threads.
My cmd line is : ./bfgminer -S cpu:auto --cpu-threads 4 --algo auto --scrypt --verbose -o stratum+tcp://eu.mul...

It's the usual, isn't it ?
18  Bitcoin / Mining software (miners) / Re: What to choose for mining into a dedicated server using CPU ? on: February 06, 2014, 06:14:16 PM
24hours after it's still same, 0.0.
Why the pool doesn't send my worker work to do ? Or I am missing something ?
19  Bitcoin / Mining software (miners) / Re: What to choose for mining into a dedicated server using CPU ? on: February 05, 2014, 10:26:36 PM
Ok let me explain my situation, I have servers, servers don't have graphic card (only an integrated chip).
That's why I'm going to use bfgminer with CPU mining.

The problem is that for the moment I am stuck at 0.0kh/s (here is a copy of a test with the use of multipool eu side and user hidden) :

 Connected to eu.multipool.us diff 0 with stratum as user x.x
 Block: ...a1ea8e44 # 88169  Diff:1.23k ( 8.79Gh/s)  Started: [23:23:58]
 ST:6  F:7  NB:32  AS:0  BW:[ 19/  2 B/s]  E:0.00  I: 0.00 BTC/hr  BS:0
 0            |   1.7/  1.7/  0.0kh/s | A:0 R:0+0(none) HW:3/none
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 CPU 0:       | 366.9/400.4/  0.0 h/s | A:0 R:0+0(none) HW:0/none
 CPU 1:       | 413.8/449.9/  0.0 h/s | A:0 R:0+0(none) HW:0/none
 CPU 2:       | 414.7/434.0/  0.0 h/s | A:0 R:0+0(none) HW:1/none
 CPU 3:       | 402.0/445.5/  0.0 h/s | A:0 R:0+0(none) HW:2/none
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 [2014-02-05 23:17:01] Stratum from pool 0 detected new block
 [2014-02-05 23:17:21] 20s:  2.6 avg:  1.7 u:  0.0 kh/s | A:0 R:0+0(none) HW:3/100%
 [2014-02-05 23:17:41] 20s:  1.6 avg:  1.7 u:  0.0 kh/s | A:0 R:0+0(none) HW:3/100%
 [2014-02-05 23:18:01] 20s:  1.0 avg:  1.7 u:  0.0 kh/s | A:0 R:0+0(none) HW:3/100%
 [2014-02-05 23:18:01] Stratum from pool 0 requested work update
 [2014-02-05 23:18:21] 20s:  2.7 avg:  1.7 u:  0.0 kh/s | A:0 R:0+0(none) HW:3/100%
 [2014-02-05 23:18:41] 20s:  1.7 avg:  1.7 u:  0.0 kh/s | A:0 R:0+0(none) HW:3/100%
 [2014-02-05 23:19:01] 20s:  1.0 avg:  1.7 u:  0.0 kh/s | A:0 R:0+0(none) HW:3/100%
 [2014-02-05 23:19:01] Stratum from pool 0 requested work update
 [2014-02-05 23:19:21] 20s:  2.8 avg:  1.7 u:  0.0 kh/s | A:0 R:0+0(none) HW:3/100%
 [2014-02-05 23:19:41] 20s:  1.7 avg:  1.7 u:  0.0 kh/s | A:0 R:0+0(none) HW:3/100%
 [2014-02-05 23:20:01] 20s:  1.0 avg:  1.7 u:  0.0 kh/s | A:0 R:0+0(none) HW:3/100%
 [2014-02-05 23:20:21] 20s:  0.6 avg:  1.7 u:  0.0 kh/s | A:0 R:0+0(none) HW:3/100%
 [2014-02-05 23:20:41] 20s:  0.4 avg:  1.7 u:  0.0 kh/s | A:0 R:0+0(none) HW:3/100%
 [2014-02-05 23:21:01] 20s:  0.2 avg:  1.6 u:  0.0 kh/s | A:0 R:0+0(none) HW:3/100%
 [2014-02-05 23:21:01] Stratum connection to pool 0 interrupted
 [2014-02-05 23:21:03] Stratum authorisation success for pool 0
 [2014-02-05 23:21:03] New block: ...deaccce7 # 88164 diff 1.23k ( 8.79Gh/s)
 [2014-02-05 23:21:03] Stratum from pool 0 detected new block
 [2014-02-05 23:21:14] New block: ...2aeccb68 # 88165 diff 1.23k ( 8.79Gh/s)
 [2014-02-05 23:21:14] Stratum from pool 0 detected new block
 [2014-02-05 23:21:21] 20s:  4.4 avg:  1.7 u:  0.0 kh/s | A:0 R:0+0(none) HW:3/100%
 [2014-02-05 23:21:41] 20s:  2.7 avg:  1.7 u:  0.0 kh/s | A:0 R:0+0(none) HW:3/100%
 [2014-02-05 23:22:01] 20s:  1.6 avg:  1.7 u:  0.0 kh/s | A:0 R:0+0(none) HW:3/100%
 [2014-02-05 23:22:21] 20s:  1.0 avg:  1.7 u:  0.0 kh/s | A:0 R:0+0(none) HW:3/100%
 [2014-02-05 23:22:41] 20s:  0.6 avg:  1.7 u:  0.0 kh/s | A:0 R:0+0(none) HW:3/100%
 [2014-02-05 23:23:01] 20s:  0.4 avg:  1.7 u:  0.0 kh/s | A:0 R:0+0(none) HW:3/100%
 [2014-02-05 23:23:14] Stratum connection to pool 0 interrupted
 [2014-02-05 23:23:15] Stratum authorisation success for pool 0
 [2014-02-05 23:23:15] New block: ...d9499606 # 88167 diff 1.23k ( 8.79Gh/s)
 [2014-02-05 23:23:15] Stratum from pool 0 detected new block
 [2014-02-05 23:23:21] 20s:  4.4 avg:  1.7 u:  0.0 kh/s | A:0 R:0+0(none) HW:3/100%
 [2014-02-05 23:23:39] New block: ...1f64329b # 88168 diff 1.23k ( 8.79Gh/s)
 [2014-02-05 23:23:39] Stratum from pool 0 detected new block
 [2014-02-05 23:23:41] 20s:  3.3 avg:  1.7 u:  0.0 kh/s | A:0 R:0+0(none) HW:3/100%
 [2014-02-05 23:23:58] New block: ...a1ea8e44 # 88169 diff 1.23k ( 8.79Gh/s)
 [2014-02-05 23:23:58] Stratum from pool 0 detected new block
 [2014-02-05 23:24:01] 20s:  2.8 avg:  1.7 u:  0.0 kh/s | A:0
20  Bitcoin / Mining software (miners) / Re: What to choose for mining into a dedicated server using CPU ? on: February 05, 2014, 09:15:45 PM
cgminer doesn't allow --enable-cpumining anymore.
So what are you using these days when you don't have a graphic card ?

You can still enable CPU mining in bfgminer, though I don't think there's really any use in CPU mining besides trying it out and seeing it work. You are very likely to use more electricity than you gain in mined coins.

For sha yes, but I would like to use scrypt so I think it's still worth with CPU no ?

Also bfgminer is not compatible with multipool.us or maybe I can't get it setup correctly...
Pages: [1] 2 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!