Bitcoin Forum
April 17, 2021, 11:54:34 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.21.0 [Torrent]
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 ... 971 »
1  Other / Meta / Re: Understanding Service Section rule. on: Today at 04:57:35 PM
Here's what I said via PM:

Well it's hard to say and is open to interpretation I guess. I didn't move it but I see it was reported as "Payment 20% Bitcoin and 80% Altcoin, since Altcoin payment is bigger than Bitcoin, Move this to Bounty section" so I can see why. I'm 50/50 on it. Since it pays at least some bitcoin you can argue it can reside there but I also see the argument for the opposite since it pays mostly in an alt.

I didn't see you created this thread but I asked about it in the staff board for clarification.
I think you should just wait for hilarious to respond but since you created this thread I'm gonna put my 2 satoshis in  Smiley

20% in BTC sounds like an attempt to create a loophole for a predominantly alt-based campaign to use the Bitcoin board. If it was e.g. 50:50 maybe you'd have a better case, although even then you'd be at the mercy of moderator discretion.

Yeah, could be. Hopefully campaigns don't start paying 1% in bitcoin or offering a small bitcoin bonus just to bend the rules.

I don't remember seeing any campaign in Services section that paid only partially in Bitcoin and mostly in other tokens.

Possible solution you may have is to separate this campaign in two parts, one can be in Services and paying only in Bitcoin, and second part can pay rewards only in tokens and be in altcoin section.

There have been some that have paid out in both but not sure of the ratio. You can have threads in both boards if you accept or pay in both alts and bitcoin so technically it probably should be allowed but this is a unique case I guess.
2  Economy / Digital goods / Re: ▂▃▅▆▆▅▃▂ PP19 5 user 20$ PP16 5 user 10$ w10pro 5 user 10$ ▂▃▅▆▆▅▃▂ on: Today at 04:32:51 PM
Please only bump your thread once per 24 hours and remove the previous bump when you do. Thanks.
3  Other / Meta / Re: Get Notified when quoted - on forum feature on: Today at 11:10:17 AM
Yeah, it would be helpful, though I believe it was one of the features being worked on for the new forum software.
4  Economy / Games and rounds / Re: Arsenal + Southampton Prediction Contest on: April 16, 2021, 10:03:02 AM
Game 1:  20'  2-0 Arsenal
Game 2:  20'  1-0 Leicester
5  Other / Meta / Re: New report feature? - Good, bad, unhandled reports on: April 15, 2021, 09:53:50 AM
Multiple threads have covered this topic from different angles in the past. The only consensus that can be gleaned is the current admins (for want of a better description) do their own thing and contradict each other when one choses not to handle a report then another marks it good or even bad if it's against one of their "gang".

Again, damned if we do damned if we don't. Just for reference, would you prefer for staff to mark them as bad in future rather than be left unhandled? Theymos himself I believe has referenced to unhandled reports as essentially considered 'soft bad' or something, but we can mark them as properly bad if this is what you would prefer? I can certainly start doing that if you want some consistency. Of course I can't guarantee what other mods think of every other post hence why we take them on a case by case basis. Things like low-quality posts are subjective though. How the hell can you reach a consensus on that? Do you think mods are one big hive-mind or should hold a committee with all mods where we vote on whether each and every post should be deleted or not? Mods do their best to follow the rules but not everything is set in stone. Someone may create a thread that merely requires a yes or no answer, so would a person who replies 'yes' or 'no' be low quality? No, not if that's all the op is looking for or needs. If the op requires more than a yes or no answer then it's probably pointless or unsubstantial. Just posting an image may be spam. Someone just posting an image of a cartoon poop is probably unsubstantial and could or should be removed, but not if someone either posts or creates a meme that is relevant or funny, or posts a very helpful picturegram that explains a lot. Sometimes pictures are worth a thousand words so we shouldn't just be removing every solitary image that someone posts just because. Also, what would you define as trolling? Well, you might think this post is trolling. Someone might find a joke that is made at their expense as trolling, but where does it cross the line? Some people have skins thin or thicker than others and some people can't take jokes. Some people suffer barrages of attacks and don't complain about it or let it effect them and then other times people take 'jokes' way too far or develop into vitriolic grudges that clearly effect their mental well-being, but of course we as mods have to try decide what crosses the line as there is no official rule or law set in stone on what constitutes trolling.

There needs to be actual defined (and posted in a thread by @theymos, not just someone else's opinion) guidelines and the biased admin/mods replaced by Veted users who are unbiased.

Gang members need not reply.

Why don't you have a go at writing these 'defined' guidelines and propose them to theymos? I'd really like to see what you could come up with at least. If they're logical maybe even theymos will implement them. I doubt you can some up with anything actually workable or better than the current 'rules' but please feel free to prove me wrong. All humans are biased. It's impossible not to be. Let's take yourself for example. I've lost count of how many times I've seen you accuse me whether directly or indirectly of having something to do with one of your posts being removed or whatnot and it never has anything to do with me. You often can't seem to grasp the concept of off topic posts. Your posts in here are off topic. So, by the rules they should or could be removed. Should staff remove them to keep some sort of consistency that you require? If someone else does remove them then you will cry about it and likely assume it was me because of your biases or paranoia, but you'd be wrong.

And who are these gang members? An imaginary group of mods that are fowling the rules correctly or just don't have the same opinion as you? This wouldn't be your biased mind conjuring up conspiracies would it? Obviously you think there's some cabal of mods that are against you but what is likely happening is you've made a post that is against the rules or is liable to be removed like the one you complained about above and some other mod has done what they should and removed it, but because of your biases you think you're being attacked and cannot look at this objectively.
6  Economy / Games and rounds / Re: - "UFC Vegas 24 Multi Master Challenge" on: April 15, 2021, 09:32:37 AM
13)  Robert Whittaker
12) Drakkar Klose
11)  Andrei Arlovski
10)  Abdul Razak Alhassan
9)  Luis Peña
Cool  Ricardo Ramos
7)  Tracy Cortez
6)  Alexander Romanov
5)  Lupita Godinez
4)  Bartosz Fabiński
3)  Austin Hubbard
2) Zarah Fairn dos Santos
1)  Tony Gravely

Strikes: 100
7  Other / Meta / Re: New report feature? - Good, bad, unhandled reports on: April 14, 2021, 12:30:42 PM
I didn't remove it and can't see any reports on it either but it's obvious that zebedee's shitpost was removed and therefore yours was as well.
8  Other / Meta / Re: The mods here deserve a dildo in their ass on: April 14, 2021, 08:01:44 AM
I'm not sure what thread of yours was moved (or deleted) but the Marketplace is pretty much just for selling things for bitcoin. If it wasn't anything to do with that then that's why it was likely moved or deleted. Or it was just another troll thread.

I object to the implication that a dildo up one's ass is necessarily a bad thing. Good for the mods if they happen to deserve and appreciate it.

I usually have to pay for this kind of service so I am very welcome of his offer.
9  Economy / Reputation / Re: Legendary trying to enroll 2 Alt Accounts at the same signature campaign on: April 12, 2021, 01:45:33 PM
I asked hilariousandco's advice about this very question a year or two ago, and if I recall correctly he told me that regardless of whether it's stated in the campaign rules, enrolling multiple accounts in the same campaign is a tag-able offense.  And as far as I know, it's been a rule in all of Yahoo62278's campaigns and pretty much every other one as well.

I don't believe I said this or you may have misinterpreted what I said. It's 100% not against the forum rules. As far as theymos or the mods are concerned you could have 100 accounts on the same campaign just as long as they're not shitposting en masse. I may have said something along the lines of the community often deems it a tagable offence. Personally I would think it's basically a terms of service violation of the campaign if it states only one person and if people want to tag people for it I wouldn't make an argument against that but I don't believe it's a crime either.
10  Other / Meta / Re: New report feature? - Good, bad, unhandled reports on: April 12, 2021, 01:36:02 PM
You are not going to be notified if a mod is not sure if action should be taken or not.
I was talking for my reporting as i have started , thats where i have my few unhandled reports !
At some stage hilariousandco or mprep have written to me as i should be stop reporting very old posts and threads .
As they good as they are and nobody will look after them.

You're free to report anything you like, but personally I feel like handling posts from a very long time ago is overkill, unless it's something serious. I won't mark them as bad but they're more likely to go unhandled. Not every mod will have the same opinion though.

You've got to wonder what the admin/mods are doing to let over seven hundred reports go "unhandled" especially when reports tend to disappear from the "your reports" list after a month or so.


Are they still there?  Why are admin/mods so undecided?

We're dammed if we do dammed if we don't. Let me ask you this, would you rather have them marked as bad? I often leave reports because I'm on the fence about them so I just leave them rather than penalise the person or user who's reported them.

Sometimes people go on reporting sprees and oftentimes it might be for things like spam or low-quality but that is completely subjective to all parties involved. You might look at the post and think it's ok, or maybe lazy but not enough to be removed and in those instances it's better to just leave them. Sometimes I just can't be bothered reading them all to make a decision but if they do go unhandled then that likely means every mod who has viewed them has come to the same conclusion.
11  Economy / Games and rounds / Re: Arsenal + Southampton Prediction Contest [Free Bets + Jerseys] on: April 08, 2021, 06:06:27 PM
Game 1:  21'  2-0 Arsenal
Game 2:  19'  2-0 Arsenal
Game 3:  0-0
12  Other / Meta / Re: Asking for the reason my main account Crpyto-DesignService got banned on: April 06, 2021, 11:11:11 AM
@hilariousandco joined here and you will get quick support when the global moderator is online again.

@alanst is one of Cryptios members who can support you too.

Your task is sign a message to your stake address. It will be simple if you still have access to that wallet.

I tried to find in Stake your Bitcoin address here and can not find your posts. I can not find any other posts that have a BTC address. The mentioned address is the only you have. Is it an address from an exchange/ gambling site? If it is like that, you can not sign a message.
It's a blockchain wallet address. Is it possible to sign it?

It says here that I have an unlimited bitcoin address...

Yes, you can sign a message from a blockchain account. Youtube how to do so.
13  Other / Meta / Re: Asking for the reason my main account Crpyto-DesignService got banned on: April 05, 2021, 12:42:43 PM
I don't know how long recovery takes but if you can sign a message I can unlock it.
14  Economy / Games and rounds / Re: - "UFC 260 Multi Master Challenge" on: March 25, 2021, 04:28:03 PM
10)  Francis Ngannou     
9)  Vicente Luque 
Cool  Sean O'Malley 
7)  Gillian Robertson
6)  Khama Worthy
5)  Alonzo Menifield
4)  Abubakar Nurmagomedov
3)  Modestas Bukauskas
2)  Omar Morales
1)  Abu Azaitar

100 total strikes
15  Other / Meta / Re: Question about 'lock topic' on: March 23, 2021, 03:18:02 PM
Probably off topic but wanted to ask this, when a mod locked a thread the user cannot unlock it which I know personally but when a mod moved a topic to the appropriate section the user can bring it back to the section where they wanted to be which is also supposed to be not possible to stop the abuse.
Both case are different. One can post a topic in wrong section if they are not familiar with the forum and once they discover their topic has been moved to other board, they are unlikely to move it further. Also, there has very few reasons to use move option to abuse but with lock/unlock feature, one can abuse a lot.
I had seen many threads has been moved to and froth after the mod handled it which means the user can overrule the moderating power and its kind of abusing it right?

Yes, but if that happens I usually send them a warning via PM and if they continue a temp ban. Hasn't happened in a very long time though.
16  Other / Meta / Re: Question about 'lock topic' on: March 23, 2021, 09:40:01 AM
A user can lock and unlock it themselves but it would be abused if a user can unlock it themselves once a mod has done so as they'd just reopen it again if they disagreed with the decision.
17  Other / Meta / Re: Feedback: You can't give more than 5 ratings to the same user on: March 23, 2021, 07:37:46 AM
Didn't realise it was a thing to be honest, but I think a better solution would be to allow people to post more than 5 but it doest effect their weighting after that. If someone has done dozens or even hundreds of deals with somebody I think they should be logged but maybe not count towards their feedback score as it can be abused.
18  Economy / Currency exchange / Re: [EXCHANGE] MONEYLION TO BTC on: March 19, 2021, 04:31:08 PM
@cyrus @hilariousandco

This won't get staff's attention. You'll need to create a scam accusation if you've been scammed and the community will chime in but scams aren't moderated by staff so there's nothing we can do.
19  Economy / Games and rounds / Re: - "UFC Vegas 22" Multi Master Challenge on: March 19, 2021, 09:11:03 AM
12)  Kevin Holland     
11)  Gregor Gillespie
10)  Cheyanne Buys 
9)  Adrian Yanez
Cool  Max Griffin
7)  Tai Tuivasa
6)  Marion Reneau
5)  Grant Dawson
4)  Trevin Giles
3)  Montel Jackson
2)  JP Buys
1)  Julia Avila

100 total strikes
20  Economy / Games and rounds / Re: - [Southampton + Watford] Prediction Contest [Free Bets + Jerseys] on: March 19, 2021, 09:04:07 AM
Game 1:  25’  1-1
Game 2:  21'  2-0 Watford
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 ... 971 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!