|
These transactions dried up in due course of time, or at least various of the here presented. Whether or not this was a result of alarm bell, mechanism upgrade or migration, oversight and/or regulations, higher authority, it remains a mystery to the public.
However, one aspect of the above mechanism cannot be highlighted enough, therefore *kick*:
If actual trades are involved, it would be a false increased (perception) of trading volume. This of course happens with as good as every asset, but it may be difficult to point out the involved bots/parties/spheres due to the obfuscation of what/who is what/who that is inherent to all assets.
For if this mechanism is a 'natural' one, then why has it not been properly investigated and documented by involved parties (trading markets). The same would apply for it being an 'anomaly'. This topic -with nobody answering to this day- might require further digging, to make sure that fair dealings are not compromised.
One might suggest that the transactions are to maintain the balance/liquidity of involved markets, as if mechanism was 'authorized', but if indeed so then the transactions would likely be composed differently and there would be documentation of the procedure(s), validation guidelines, et cetera, which would simply explain all this.
|
|
|
|
|
Time to buy into the dip again it seems.
|
|
|
|
@BullTheoryioTHE U.S. DOLLAR IS TESTING THE SAME ZONE THAT TRIGGERED THE 2017 AND 2021 BITCOIN BULL RUN. The Dollar Index (DXY) has broken below its 16-year long-term trendline, and is sitting at the critical level of 96. Each time DXY has broken below 96 and held there, Bitcoin has moved aggressively higher. - June 2017: DXY dropped below 96. Bitcoin rose almost 8x in the next 5–6 months. - 2020 pandemic period: After massive liquidity entered markets, DXY lost 96 again. Bitcoin rose about 7x in the next 7–8 months. Ethereum and altcoins gained 10x, 20x, and more. This is how liquidity cycles work. When the dollar weakens: - Cash loses relative strength - Capital flows into scarce assets Bitcoin benefits directly from that shift. Right now, DXY is again at this historical trigger level while breaking its long-term structure. If it loses 96 and stays below, Bitcoin can start moving higher. https://x.com/bulltheoryio/status/2016533063677923601 Another perspective: The dollar does not really weaken in regard to BTC, due to the integration of $$ tokens (usdt, usdc). The dollar is in that sense 'diversified' to that extent that the definition of weak needs to be revised, also when speaking of weak in general (vs other currencies, flows, markets). The dollar is only perceived as weak from the archaic point of view. In the new perspective, the dollar is as weak/strong as those parts of its economy which it supports (holds good relationships with).
|
|
|
|
|
The chart shows that the current cycle of ltc trading / volume pumping* might end soon. There has been no alteration in the behavior of some very large wallets/bots. If no need hype is commenced, then one more round and LTC can be drained.
Hope not though, and I bet someone several parties still have something up their sleeve.
If you like to take risks, these days might be a good time to buy (I will).
*by bots, check the btc, eth and ltc blockchain explorer
|
|
|
|
|
I need to wait a few days to be able to check some things, my bank account is empty -_-'
In the end this is all legit, so it will be impossible to put any real claim of wrongdoing on it. It might be that the only clue the future gives about what happens in the company is by the movement of their offices and assets. It is interesting to follow this though, because the nature of (white collar) fiscal fraud is that it tends to remain ahead of the rules.
How does one stay ahead of the rules?
|
|
|
|
I´ve puzzled ...
why Vilius Kavaliauskas has sold his Pacific Private Bank to the founders of Spectrocoin/Bankera, and I could find out only one plausible reason: Spectrocoin/Bankera is strategically interesting for Lewben Group. The price for Pacific Private Bank could have been the secret integration of Spectrocoin/Bankera in Lewben Group. Lewben Group never reports its holdings in other companies!
Under this point of view Pacific Private Bank would farther stay at Lewben Group. The "acquisition" is only an eyewash for the public.
It's not even an eyewash, because mr. Kavaliauskas remains a sitting board member of the bank. That can be a legitimate way to structure one's interest in several parties. However, there is much more to this. Ask yourselves, what is this Lewben group? What are we seeing here? A company? The trade register in The Netherlands holds several entries related to the Lewben group, of which the most notable are probably the holdings, https://www.kvk.nl/zoeken/?source=all&q=lewben&start=0&site=kvk2014Here's the main registrant's address / office seat: https://www.instantstreetview.com/@52.365573,4.891106,343.9h,20.58p,1zI can tell you right now. This is textbook tax evasion. There are several routes, but it will probably work like this: - Company comes here and registers a holding or a similar construction - Company uses a mechanism in the taxation system that is called [deelnemersvrijstelling], which basically is the exemption from taxation (for the holding) if taxation is done already, in another jurisdiction for example. It is a mechanism to prevent double taxations when doing a lot of transactions between or within companies here that do international business. - Company will then notify the tax collector of this, and show that they pay tax in The Cayman Islands, Malta, Cyprus or wherever. The tax over there just happens to be 0% or extremely extremely low. Done. 100% legit, no questions asked.
|
|
|
|
I´ve puzzled ...
why Vilius Kavaliauskas has sold his Pacific Private Bank to the founders of Spectrocoin/Bankera, and I could find out only one plausible reason: Spectrocoin/Bankera is strategically interesting for Lewben Group. The price for Pacific Private Bank could have been the secret integration of Spectrocoin/Bankera in Lewben Group. Lewben Group never reports its holdings in other companies!
Under this point of view Pacific Private Bank would farther stay at Lewben Group. The "acquisition" is only an eyewash for the public.
k, I send you a reply by private message, but somehow I messed up the message. Gimme a minute :p
|
|
|
|
I am still waiting to sell my Tokens. Only good thing I invested little, but still want to get my money back and move on.
Do you think that Bankera is dead or why are you so negative about the project? It could get back on track and move forward. It is already on track. It's already moving forward. Faster than you think. That's nice. How about enlightening the folks here with the information to verify that claim?
|
|
|
|
|
Will the jackpot slot machine (and internal exchange etc) go up right after the ICO counter hits 0? Meaning like 5 days or so?
And what price will the jackpot be?
|
|
|
|
One might imagine the devastation of the effect that Tether can possibly bring by just taking a closer look at the BTC trading graphics/charts: https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/bitcoin/trading_exchanges#panel 33.3% of the trade will be the mere minimum that will be affected, and does yet not take into account the USD and Bitfinex (which are both tied to USDT in some sort) and the subsequent decline of as well Ethereum: https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/ethereum/trading_exchanges#panelEthereum will be crippled if USDT fails, because not only is USDT entwined in 24.9% of all Ethereum trades, the effect is complementary to USDT affecting the underlying BTC price as well. ETH/BTC will drastically alter when a run from tokens>eth>btc>fiat starts. Most ERC20 tokens might lose up most if not all their current value. Actually this drain of value from ERC20 tokens has been going on for some time already, very slowly, and with a subtle price pump now and then for the more "popular" tokens, to keep people believing in those ridiculous projects. If you are currently investing in crypto and the only way to cash out is through Bitfinex (USD/USDT), it might be wise to reconsider the situation you are in, again. That exchange is the first one where things will start to fall apart if people make a run for their money. Remember how in real life even a small and seemingly insignificant bank could topple entire societies and economies worldwide some years ago? And remember that in crypto there are no rules! These people that tell others to have good faith and that things are 100% well-organized, without any motivation to pursuit a more adequate answer, they are the same people that thrive in the absence of rules as always, namely idiots (the ones unintentional bringing harm to others) and criminals/mafia (the ones intentionally not caring for others being harmed).
|
|
|
|
|
Jackpot slot machine coming up soon right? Can't wait ^^
|
|
|
|
So how come you've only just registered? Why not using your pro oldskool account and tell him how it's done?
|
|
|
|
I think credit should be given to whom it is due, what Tether did for the space is not small, though the team has to clear up the air about some questions being ask but this is far from scam. I don't know if people observe that since the FUD around Tether started the price of BTC has suffered great dip
Can you specify then what Tether did for the space? I'm not quiet sure (yet).
|
|
|
|
|
Especially the fact that Tether has been allowed to come into play is remarkable, because now we have:
- An ongoing bullish trend / increase in value - "Experts" claiming crypto is secure and that the future will be great ("we're all becoming rich") - The economy is slowing down / not picking up the right pace - Increased influx of USD to pump the market (through USDT) - Increased access to the crypto market for the public (through USDT, and crypto exchanges poppin' up like mushrooms)
Now let's take a look at the US housing bubble
- An ongoing bullish trend / increase in value - "Experts" claiming that house prices are booming and real estate is good business ("we're all becoming rich") - The economy is slowing down / not picking up the right pace - Increased influx of USD to pump the market (through increased interest rates) - Increased access to the market for the public (through subprime mortgages and loans/credit without collateral)
And here's the US derivatives bubble
- An ongoing bullish trend / increase in value - "Experts" claiming that derivative are the next best thing and the market is safe ("we're all becoming rich") - The economy is slowing down / not picking up the right pace - Increased influx of USD to pump the market (too big to fail bailout) - Increased access to the market for the public (loosening up regulations that allowed all kinds of derivatives, and the introduction of smartphone/browser stock trading applications)
|
|
|
|
|
It's a bit odd.
Since people cannot cash out USDT to USD, every USDT that is bought with USD represents $1 that will never leave the crypto market.
So when buying USDT with USD, no real value is added to the cryptomarket, and yet when USDT would "cease to exist" 2.5 billion USD will be gone from the crypto market. How? Because of the deception in how value is being defined and calculated. If something cannot be traded for $1, then why would it be worth $1?
|
|
|
|
If the rumors will be demonstrated, it will be another shot to cryptocurrency credibility. However, when the system you manage - I'm not talking only about Tehter - starts to move hundreds of millions of dollars, and you don't have any kind of rules to respect or authority controlling you... well, I think that the temptation to cross the borders - in any sense - becomes very high.
The enormous false volume that moves around in circles each day in day out, the large proportion of fake coins/ico's, and Tether that is just still up and running... as if the blockchain and crypto market are being used as some sort of testing ground.
|
|
|
|
|
I need the one armed bandit rolling at all times.
|
|
|
|
From the comparison of different platform to Letbet. I think Letbet is the best. Good work team.
The slot machine isn't working for several days now. Good work on what?
|
|
|
|
Hi Bankera team The adviser list disappeared from the homepage. When will the latest list excluding advisor for ICO period be released at any time? Did the lawmakers escape? Did Ron also run away?  Please disclose the information properly and reassure us Hello, Bankera’s website is being updated to reflect this new phase. We are building a new advisory board that includes legal, financial, security advisors and not all of them can or want to be public. And what happened to the old advice and why did he run away? Such drastic changes greatly exert pressure on investors and we should clarify this situation. I really like your project, but such things specifically undermine its credibility. You are right. Some people invested because Ron and EU legislators are in advisers. Bankera also published a video to interview Ron. If he quit, is not there an obligation to make public? I do not think that you are scam but I feel unfaithful. Please make the information properly available. There are few people who can be convinced by the present word including at least me. So if they put up those nice pictures again at the website you will all be okay again?
|
|
|
|
|
Viola operates in Ukraine as well? Or is that a different company?
|
|
|
|
|