Show Posts
|
Pages: [1]
|
If you want it easy go for hiveos. It's very simple and this tool is already included. You don't have to install it, you can run it from usb drive. This version is specifically for rx Vega series https://download.hiveos.farm/hiveos-vega-0.6-01@181121.zip you should update it at the first boot. It's just a matter of one click.
|
|
|
Ethash benefits from memory bandwidth, so it's no surprise r7 does that hr. It has 1tb/sec bandwidth. So it's capable of about 128mh theoretically. Cryptonight algos benefit from low latency.
|
|
|
I'm not sure it's right to mention another miner in this thread but I think it may help the author to fix the heavy hashrate bugs. The thing is that latest xmrig has managed to achieve very good speeds on heavy and it's stable. I've switched all my rigs to test it and it does the job. I'm getting ~1800h from vega 56 and ~920-960h from 570 4gb and ~400 from r7 370 and ~580-600h from 560 4gb but unstable. So 560s are working with jce 0.33b4 It's open source so it's easy to see how it was achieved.
|
|
|
Been using 33b6 since it came out and I can say there's nothing changed since b5. I can achieve stable hashrate but with much lower multihash. I'm talking about 570 4gb. I can get ~1000 out of those but only for a couple of minutes. Stable hashrate is around 800-900 (I used to get ~820 using 0.32q). So +20% boost is somewhat artificial for now. But on rx vega it does seem to be stable enough. I'm getting ~1840 per card for 24h+
|
|
|
Unfortunately it has happened again. Hashrate drop. Cruel hashrate drop. From 26-27kh to 20.5-22. This was at the first day I tried 0.33b5 but then I tried different settings and everything seemed fine until several hours ago. I noticed that my hashrate on pool decreased and I noticed that effective hashrate reported by jce has decreased too. I tried to restart miner/reboot rigs, nothing helps. I'll wait for the next version. I'm sure it'll be fixed.
|
|
|
Dunno if it's of any help to fix unstable hashrate but I settled on this config for rx570 4gb (880-910 per card).
{ "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta":4, "index" : 1, "multi_hash":448 }, { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta":4, "index" : 1, "multi_hash":448 },
And the same but multihash 992 gives me 1830-1870 from vega56. 11.1kh from 6 gpu rig. 1014watts. That rig has been working for 24 hours and hashrate drop was insignificant (10.9kh). But the other rx vega rig works best with multihash 960. I may be wrong but looks like both threads have to have equal multihash and that was not the case in the previous versions.
Big thanks for this great miner!
|
|
|
You should try 0.33b4, it has some heavy optimization and it's stable for me. 0.33b5 should be avoided for now. It has increased fee but has very unstable heavy hashrate (especially the effective one). I'm a big fan of this miner and been using it for several months and I'm sure the creator will fix the problems but for now I would recommend to use previous versions or other miners. As for V8, I couldn't get close to teamred results, so I don't quite understand the new fee with explanation like "I only have teamred as a competitor, thus such fee". Also it looks like it would be fair to take that fee accordingly to the algo mined. For example jce is not better then others in cn-lite,xtl... So I would mine with other miners to save extra 1.5% of hashrate but I would definitely use jce for heavy variants with it's brilliant implementation (when it's fixed for stability).
Maybe you forgot that the 2+% fee is only for heavy algo and heavy based algos. For v8 and all other algos based on v7 or v8 fee is still 0.9%. You're right, it's increased only for heavy variants.
|
|
|
You should try 0.33b4, it has some heavy optimization and it's stable for me. 0.33b5 should be avoided for now. It has increased fee but has very unstable heavy hashrate (especially the effective one). I'm a big fan of this miner and been using it for several months and I'm sure the creator will fix the problems but for now I would recommend to use previous versions or other miners. As for V8, I couldn't get close to teamred results, so I don't quite understand the new fee with explanation like "I only have teamred as a competitor, thus such fee". Also it looks like it would be fair to take that fee accordingly to the algo mined. For example jce is not better then others in cn-lite,xtl... So I would mine with other miners to save extra 1.5% of hashrate but I would definitely use jce for heavy variants with it's brilliant implementation (when it's fixed for stability).
|
|
|
Same as mentioned but multi_hash 992 gave me 1840-1890 on vega56 but... I had to stop mining heavy with this miner for now as the hashrate is not stable at all. It can be 16** or 18** or even 15**. I tried tons of settings, it looks to be random. The same goes for rx5** series. Sometimes I have 650hs sometimes 1020. From the very same gpu with the very same freqs/voltages. Rx560 4gb perform much better in previous versions , they deliver stable 590-600hs, and only 460 with this version.
|
|
|
Well the value of best shares history comes to the fore when someone mines solo (like I do) cause it helps to understand whether all your large shares got to solve the block. It helps to understand if your pool is working fine. Cause if you've had like 4 shares with bigger value then the current network difficulty but got only 3 blocks then you should check what went wrong on the pool side. If it's not difficult to implement then it would be nice to have that.
|
|
|
Many thanks to the creator of this great miner, I'm using it on 560/470/570/Vegas and it delivers the best hashrate among any other miners I've tried but I miss two features: failover pools and best shares in api (I know that I can turn stak compatibility mode on and see those but it would be much better to have that in jce format report as jce format also shows fans/temperatures).
|
|
|
|