 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 »
|
|
Is the beta release more stable then 0.8.3?
|
|
|
|
|
Any tips on how to increase stability with this miner?
I often get the 1 gpu to reset to default in afterburner then it ends up rebooting the rig. (tried both lowering the intensity and without overclock, basically only kept PL to 75%)
ty
|
|
|
|
|
sadly the dev fee crashes all rigs when mining lyra2v2 by switching to whatever it does.
Guess I'll check back once this is fixed for good.
|
|
|
|
Actually, checked more. Fork protection triggered as expected after some time, issue was also that miners were using 24h estimates, which look back for average prices in last 24h, and of course were higher than mining remaining shield coin in x17
People still mine on 24h actuals?  Guess they deserve it then  |
|
|
|
The funny part is that the reason profits are lower isn't the stratum fault. By now even a rock has figure out why or has listen to some discord chats about a "certain" delay wich is been work on. Experts should probably go mine on other pools. |
|
|
|
net hash and pool hash were almost the same pretty easy to understand why the profits were good  We've been conditioned to be suspicious when profitability is higher than usual. Just check the explorer of the coin and the block on the pool,it's pretty easy tbh |
|
|
|
net hash and pool hash were almost the same pretty easy to understand why the profits were good |
|
|
|
I'm still getting a "Error: Unknown Domain" when visiting the web page. Is the page still down?
The firewall is blocking a bit too much and that seems to happen quite often, I believe pinpin is working on improving the situation |
|
|
|
Bulwark (nist5) amount is now 33.333334 instead of 37.5 Remember to change PS:dont sleep too much we are losing group luckrate |
|
|
|
291 miners still wasting hashrate on neoscrypt sparks. Remove the algo or mine directly another coin. Pinpin is probably in bed for another few hours before he can fix or disable. 2cents |
|
|
|
So the afterEFX of spreading ahashpool all over the place have finally hit the pool rewards. I wonder wich one you'll flood next |
|
|
|
I must say estimates currently are wrong, and this is I want to fix tonight. Estimates supposed to work for algo switch for best selected coins however some miners like to mine just some coin, but it contributes as with bad rating to overall capability.
Wich ones? estimate current or 24h or both? All coins or only some of them? Thx |
|
|
|
Mining on Skunk/auto, I take it SONO was completely removed then.
I believe pinpin will look into it and re-add it when it's ok. |
|
|
|
Is Skunk/MUN available/working as of now?
Working fine, Sono was the chain with problems |
|
|
|
|
Is there a way to view the TX of a BTC transaction?
I see I had a payment but can't find any place on the site to able to track it.
Any ideas?
|
|
|
|
Woohoo! Making progress in Neoscrypt now.
For those of you using Neoscrypt, I'd advise switching to Excavator 1.4.1a release for a Windows-based miner. It outperforms all Neoscrypt miners I've dealt with for most cards, assuming you're on 9.1 CUDA support and latest drivers. Don't trust the hashrate numbers coming out of HSRMiner; Palgin is a great guy, but the miner misrepresents what is actually doing at a pool level and has problems with hashrate dropoff over time.
What are you getting with latest excavator? 1080Ti (105% pwr, +100 core, +250 mem) = avg just over 1.69 MH/s 1070 (no OC) = avg just over 1.00 MH/s On my 4x1080Ti + 1x1070 rig, I was getting about 7.3 MH/s with KlausT. Excavator 1.4.1a gets me 7.76 MH/s. Palgin HSRMiner reports over 8 MH/s (after a 15 minute warmup period), but that doesn't match the pool reported hash rate and it starts to drop off after 30 minutes or so (and comes with a devfee). https://github.com/nicehash/excavator/releases/download/v1.4.1a/excavator_v1.4.1a_NVIDIA_Win64_CUDA_9.1.zipNice find It does perform better then klaust. thank you! |
|
|
|
Woohoo! Making progress in Neoscrypt now.
For those of you using Neoscrypt, I'd advise switching to Excavator 1.4.1a release for a Windows-based miner. It outperforms all Neoscrypt miners I've dealt with for most cards, assuming you're on 9.1 CUDA support and latest drivers. Don't trust the hashrate numbers coming out of HSRMiner; Palgin is a great guy, but the miner misrepresents what is actually doing at a pool level and has problems with hashrate dropoff over time.
What are you getting with latest excavator? |
|
|
|
|
While skunk is ok and doesn't have that right?
|
|
|
|
Getting some weird numbers, no idea if the api is jumpy or what. I see the btc/day value jump a lot and sometimes pretty high (was wondering if it forked like Altcom or if everything is running ok) |
|
|
|
Is there a problem with xevan numbers using sniffdog?  |
|
|
|
|
