 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 »
|
|
Hey, where can I sell my gobyte?
can't find any working exchange... looks like a dead coin to me
|
|
|
|
|
Hi everybody! I want to fork a codebase of an existing blockchain and start a new chain and a new coin, but I don't know which codebase to choose. I started with the idea of forking XVG code, because I like private and public transactions but then since I want a PoS or a consensus or anyway not a PoW coin, and I’d prefer not to create a token (but is still an option), I don’t want to fork XVG codebase anymore and I’m now looking for some other codebase to fork.
So trimming down my few requisites are:
-no PoW
-support for fast transactions
-support for a lot of transactions per second 1000+
The point is having 100% of the coins premined and just distributed among some bots that will always trade them between each other for determined reasons.
I was thinking that for new block generation I have two options:
- each new block gives 100% of the new coins to one predetermined address and if it’s a PoS coin its splits the transaction fee between coin holders
- Each block doesn’t create any new coin but it contains only transaction fee
- the transaction fee will be a fixed a 10% on each transaction and not linked to the weight of the transaction data.
Ofc i need to modify the blockchain to make it work exactly as i want, but i want to start from something that doesn’t require me too much work
Any suggestion on which one should I use?
Thanks for your help!
|
|
|
|
|
Hi everybody! I want to fork a codebase of an existing blockchain and start a new chain and a new coin, but I don't know which codebase to choose. I started with the idea of forking XVG code, because I like private and public transactions but then since I want a PoS or a consensus or anyway not a PoW coin, and I’d prefer not to create a token (but is still an option), I don’t want to fork XVG codebase anymore and I’m now looking for some other codebase to fork.
So trimming down my few requisites are:
-no PoW
-support for fast transactions
-support for a lot of transactions per second 1000+
The point is having 100% of the coins premined and just distributed among some bots that will always trade them between each other for determined reasons.
I was thinking that for new block generation I have two options:
- each new block gives 100% of the new coins to one predetermined address and if it’s a PoS coin its splits the transaction fee between coin holders
- Each block doesn’t create any new coin but it contains only transaction fee
- the transaction fee will be a fixed a 10% on each transaction and not linked to the weight of the transaction data.
Ofc i need to modify the blockchain to make it work exactly as i want, but i want to start from something that doesn’t require me too much work
Any suggestion on which one should I use?
Thanks for your help!
|
|
|
|
|
I'm having an issue with awesome miner and bminer.
I'm trying to read and transform in €/day 2 external miners. I've added them to the miners list (only for reading, no control) and Awesome Miner recognize them and reads the hashes for each card and so on.
The problem is that when I try to specify the coin that I'm mining it tells me: "the mining software is not reporting any pool for this miner"
Is there any way to fix/bypass this? I just want to tell him that I'm mining zcash, so that I can see how much I'm making a day
I have the 4.7.4
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
Hi, i tried to fork the main repo to test some edits, but it does not seems to work, is there any special required passage?
|
|
|
|
Does altminer has more than one fee or is it only the 0.9%?
Is only 0.9% Problem is that by comparing the previous 24h diff average and what altminer payed in the previous 24h... the amount i got is off by more than 30% |
|
|
|
|
Does altminer has more than one fee or is it only the 0.9%?
|
|
|
|
|
Lovely miner fork, good job mate.
Do you have any intention to build a telegram bot support for monitor and control?
|
|
|
|
Hi, i have a z270 a and i was wondering which PCIe lane are connected to the CPU and which are to the chipset.
Unfortunately the manual says nothing at all.
I'm currently at 13 GPU, but i want to get more on the board. I know there are a few lanes left, gotta found them.
Anyone that knows how the lanes are split?
Chipset Z270 has 24 lines of PCI-E and other lines depend on the processor. M.2 SATA are connected to the chipset. The following shows the hardware connection (top to bottom): PCIe 3.0 x1 x1 (Z270) PCIe 3.0 x16 x16/x8 (CPU) PCIe 3.0 x1 x1 (Z270) PCIe 3.0 x1 x1 (Z270) PCIe 3.0 x16 x8 (CPU) PCIe 3.0 x1 x1 (Z270) PCIe 3.0 x16 x4 (Z270) Perfect. Thanks Til now i had 2 1 to 4 pcie connected to these: PCIe 3.0 x16 x8 (CPU) PCIe 3.0 x1 x1 (Z270) OFC i wasn't able to get over 13 GPU. I'll test by moving the second to the PCIe 3.0 x16 x16/x8 (CPU) Will i be able to get to 15? Anyway, i have a GPU in the PCIe 3.0 x16 x4 (Z270) slot without a riser, should i use a riser with that too? Then i'll try by having a 3rd 1to4 to one of the 2 1to4 and i'll try to get to 18. Seems reasonable, right? Do you know what other hardware use some PCIe lanes? I know for sure about the USB 3.0 hub and board graphics (deactivated). What about all the other usb ports, sata connectors, rgb, ram, etc...? On page 1-8, there is a resource sharing table (IRQ). ASM2142 uses 2 lines of PCI-E. Other connection options you can check yourself.  I saw that table but wasn't able to get any other info. How can u tell how many lanes are used andif from cpu or chipset? |
|
|
|
Hi, i have a z270 a and i was wondering which PCIe lane are connected to the CPU and which are to the chipset.
Unfortunately the manual says nothing at all.
I'm currently at 13 GPU, but i want to get more on the board. I know there are a few lanes left, gotta found them.
Anyone that knows how the lanes are split?
Chipset Z270 has 24 lines of PCI-E and other lines depend on the processor. M.2 SATA are connected to the chipset. The following shows the hardware connection (top to bottom): PCIe 3.0 x1 x1 (Z270) PCIe 3.0 x16 x16/x8 (CPU) PCIe 3.0 x1 x1 (Z270) PCIe 3.0 x1 x1 (Z270) PCIe 3.0 x16 x8 (CPU) PCIe 3.0 x1 x1 (Z270) PCIe 3.0 x16 x4 (Z270) Perfect. Thanks Til now i had 2 1 to 4 pcie connected to these: PCIe 3.0 x16 x8 (CPU) PCIe 3.0 x1 x1 (Z270) OFC i wasn't able to get over 13 GPU. I'll test by moving the second to the PCIe 3.0 x16 x16/x8 (CPU) Will i be able to get to 15? Anyway, i have a GPU in the PCIe 3.0 x16 x4 (Z270) slot without a riser, should i use a riser with that too? Then i'll try by having a 3rd 1to4 to one of the 2 1to4 and i'll try to get to 18. Seems reasonable, right? Do you know what other hardware use some PCIe lanes? I know for sure about the USB 3.0 hub and board graphics (deactivated). What about all the other usb ports, sata connectors, rgb, ram, etc...? |
|
|
|
|
Hi, i have a z270 a and i was wondering which PCIe lane are connected to the CPU and which are to the chipset.
Unfortunately the manual says nothing at all.
I'm currently at 13 GPU, but i want to get more on the board. I know there are a few lanes left, gotta found them.
Anyone that knows how the lanes are split?
|
|
|
|
|
Guys, i can't start any miner with more than 8 GPU
I tested an 11 GPU (4 1060+7 1070) rig and every miner i tried crarshes. All the GPU are in the device manager without any error.
If i switch to mi HIVEOS (Linux distro) i can mine with all the cards flawlessy
What have you done to make it work on windows?
|
|
|
|
|
Guys, i can't make awsome miner work with the latest version of Excavator, i keep getting "failed to open command file -p"
And i can't make it work with the API even by setting the api port manually
|
|
|
|
I really can't make the json work.
I have 8 NVIDIA cards but only 1 is being picked (nescrypt)
What should i do?
Can I see your json file? You have to add 8 workers, if you have 8 cards. {"time":3,"commands":[
{"id":1,"method":"worker.add","params":["0","0"]},
{"id":1,"method":"worker.add","params":["0","1"]},
{"id":1,"method":"worker.add","params":["0","2"]},
{"id":1,"method":"worker.add","params":["0","3"]},
{"id":1,"method":"worker.add","params":["0","4"]},
{"id":1,"method":"worker.add","params":["0","5"]},
{"id":1,"method":"worker.add","params":["0","6"]},
{"id":1,"method":"worker.add","params":["0","7"]}
]},So silly, i was missing the "," after each line. Thanks Do you still support Awsome Miner? I keep getting "failed to open command file -p" |
|
|
|
|
I really can't make the json work.
I have 8 NVIDIA cards but only 1 is being picked (nescrypt)
What should i do?
|
|
|
|
any difference? more stable
Have you tried upgrading to the latest version? |
|
|
|
OS Name: Microsoft Windows Server 2016 Standard
OS Version: 10.0.14393 N/A Build 14393
video 390.77
ccminer 2.2.4 works fine in the same config (16gpu's), ccminer does not work correctly with 17+ cards
Why server version? |
|
|
|
There is a bug same as in hsr miner. It does not support multi gpu mining, when gpu's more than 15 Example: i've choosen to mine with device number 10 but miner understood 10 as device number 0 And when i try to use only device with number 12 i get the following error INFO : [08:30:55] : Wrong CUDA device GPU#'12' specified in -d option When try 11 device error is Wrong CUDA device GPU#'11' specified in -d option  Here are my devices GPU #0: SM 6.1 P104-100 GPU #1: SM 6.1 Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti GPU #2: SM 6.1 Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti GPU #3: SM 6.1 MSI GTX 1080 GPU #4: SM 6.1 Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti GPU #5: SM 6.1 MSI GTX 1080 GPU #6: SM 6.1 MSI GTX 1080 GPU #7: SM 6.1 P104-100 GPU #8: SM 6.1 Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti GPU #9: SM 6.1 MSI GTX 1080 GPU #10: SM 6.1 MSI GTX 1080 GPU #11: SM 6.1 P104-100 GPU #12: SM 6.1 P104-100 GPU #13: SM 6.1 P104-100 GPU #14: SM 6.1 Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti GPU #15: SM 6.1 P104-100 What W10 build and NVIDIA driver are you using? |
|
|
|
|
