321
|
Bitcoin / Mining / Re: Solo mining... how to do?
|
on: July 22, 2011, 07:20:25 PM
|
No log that I am aware of. If you are getting a failed to connect, the issue might be a firewall on your windows machine. You can try adding an exception, or disabling it altogether until you can solve the problem. Another thing you can try is to telnet to the ipaddress and port and see if it connects.
good idea i will try the telnet thing when I get home. I already tried disabling firewall. Am I correct in using that command though?
|
|
|
322
|
Bitcoin / Mining / Re: Solo mining... how to do?
|
on: July 22, 2011, 06:48:49 PM
|
How do I point phoenix on my linux rig to my windows machine hosting namecoind? whenever i try to connect with the usualy -u http://user:pass@ipaddress:port it doesn't work just says failed to connect... Is there a log anywhere? I do not want to mine locally I want to do it across my LAN from 2 machines.
|
|
|
326
|
Bitcoin / Mining / Re: Multiple mining rigs behind single public IP
|
on: July 21, 2011, 08:10:40 PM
|
Well, they are to Affected, because :
If you Pool mine, you dont need any Bitcoin Clients Running (Except the one to receive your BTC). If you Solo mine, you only need one Client started as "bitcoin.exe -server" and connect the Miners via IP to it.
Greetings, frog
not to mention if you're solo mining and your bitcoin server is behind the same router, it's not even going outside the lan.
|
|
|
327
|
Bitcoin / Pools / Re: PoolMunity.com - true worlds-first Bitcoin/Namecoin pool + everything
|
on: July 18, 2011, 08:05:35 PM
|
Hi, and welcome. If you open up the main forum page you'll see at the bootom of the page the total numbers of members registered. However the memberlist itself doesn't count members, who haven't activated their account yet. If they do not activate with in a reasonable time, I'm going to adjust the fees manually. regards, talpan edit: I've deleted 3 spam registration. PS: now let's hit that long block Awesome, I think you should also make a requirement for power contributions too. IE: 100mhps minimum to reap the benefit. Just a suggestion. This way you might get more big contributors. edit: I just realized what you meant. so unactivated accounts will still take priority for the 0% once they become active? Instead of my active account currently working at 300mphs? that seems a bit off
|
|
|
329
|
Bitcoin / Mining / Re: [Guide]How to setup an automated headless LinuxCoin mining rig + watchdog
|
on: July 16, 2011, 09:05:36 PM
|
I think the watchdog may need a little work.
The most common lockup that you will find is when a card locks up due to instability from too aggressive of an overclock. When this happens, aticonfig will return 99% load, even though the card is essentially dead and not doing anything
(in fact, I don't think I've ever seen a GPU go below 50% in any case other than A) purposefully throttling the card or B) when the card hits high temperature limit and throttles its self down for protection. - in either case, a restart of the miner wouldn't really be doing much)
simple solution. Back your overclocks to a stable speed and reap the reward and not worrying about your rigs. the benefit of rigs not locking up is well worth the 2-5% performance hit from an extreme overclock. I run a pretty decent overclock (past bios limit) and this config works great for me. results may vary for others, but i suggest trying it before presenting hypothetical situations. besides when one of my cards locks up it freezes the whole machine, in which case i doubt the script is of any use. point being... find a stable overclock.
|
|
|
330
|
Bitcoin / Mining / Re: [Guide]How to setup an automated headless LinuxCoin mining rig + watchdog
|
on: July 15, 2011, 04:27:39 PM
|
DrGr33n really came through with linux coin KJJ really came through with those scripts. You came through with this guide for those who have a hard time with this sort of stuff. I can confirm this setup works great. Although I am still on old version of linuxcoin I have been running stable and overclocked for a couple weeks now since implementing.
Maybe you should add a section for SmartCoin for the benefit of redundancy of pools. That's something I haven't gotten around to yet, and would love a cut and dry guide for it. I'm sure it's not hard, but I'm sure it can be cleaned up a bit.
Thanks to DrGr33n, KJJ, and Yanz
|
|
|
332
|
Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Thank you Mt Gox: My money is in limbo for a month now
|
on: July 09, 2011, 04:54:27 PM
|
I definitely took the tl;dr route, but all I can say is I tried to transfer 100.00 to my friend via mt gox. I accidently spazzed and double clicked the submit button. Somehow to my astonishment gox allowed the transaction to go through, leaving me with a nearly negative 100.00USD balance.
Yes, negative. I moved all my coin to another account so I could sell if I wanted to without having to wait for the to fix my account. I think it took close to a month, and answering the same questions several times before they finally resolve it. It sucks waiting, but just be patient.
hope this rebuilds some faith for you.
|
|
|
333
|
Bitcoin / Mining / Re: anyone got 4 5830s in a machine? in a case
|
on: July 09, 2011, 02:10:38 AM
|
4x 5830's there ya have it. msi 890fx gd70 (6 pcie slots) 295mhps per card 950 core /300 mem runs 24/7 with help of a small house fan linuxcoin oh yea i recently cut that grill out of the front and have a fan exhausting the air
|
|
|
334
|
Bitcoin / Mining / Re: Capital cost.
|
on: July 06, 2011, 10:58:12 PM
|
I'm roughly around $3000 for 3600mhps = $0.83/mhps or 1.2mhps/$
first rig was 4x 5830's at 109 + free ship (wish i had to balls at the time to go all out and just get 12) Then after cashing out my first coin I ordered 2 more rigs of 4x 6870's.
MSI 890FX GD70's 900watt & 1000watt PSU's
|
|
|
335
|
Bitcoin / Mining / Re: Bitcoin Monitoring Service - Bitmon.me
|
on: July 06, 2011, 10:31:06 PM
|
Why does it require the username and pass of the miners?
I only entered API token and stats show nothing at all.
edit: never mind I see what's going on now, unfortunately I am burned out on linux and scripts for the moment. And I did not have the best of luck using screen. Maybe later down the road I will dig this up again. Good word though!
|
|
|
336
|
Bitcoin / Mining / Re: Startup Miner PLEASE HELP!
|
on: July 06, 2011, 10:14:13 PM
|
Refer to this thread. It will still apply to ubuntu http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=7374.msg248025#msg248025I am using this setup on 3 miners (4 cards each) This will check every 10 mins if miners are running based on two variables. Whether the minerx.sh script is running and whether or not there is a load on the GPU's. If either condition is true it will kill the miner and reopen it. This has saved me a lot of stress and worrying. Hope this helps.
|
|
|
338
|
Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: LinuxCoin A lightweight Debian based OS with everything ready to go.
|
on: June 30, 2011, 02:31:42 AM
|
thanks so much.
I couldnt find it because the file didn't show up even though that command returned that it was in the typical miner/phoenix/kernel/phatk folder it should have been.
so i went ahead and downloaded the newest version of phoenix which is something i had been needing to do anyway. (i'm still running 0.2a)
just updating to the newest version seemed to bump up a few megahash, but then editing that file bumped it up a decent amount.
before the update and mod i was running about 305 mhps now i'm running 315.
is there a way to stop the ati agreement from running at start? also the welcome message?
|
|
|
339
|
Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: LinuxCoin A lightweight Debian based OS with everything ready to go.
|
on: June 30, 2011, 01:13:56 AM
|
Did you guys try this: I just tried this and got >3% improvement in mining speed. You can go to phatk's kernel.cl file (don't worry, it just sits there in the open, no need to recompile anything), find this line #define Ma(x, y, z) amd_bytealign((y), (x | z), (z & x)) and change it to this line #define Ma(x, y, z) amd_bytealign( (z^x), (y), (x) ) Once you've done it, restart the miner.
? I edited my file and it seems to really increase the hashrate, maybe something to look into Gr33n? where is this kernel.cl file?
|
|
|
|