Bitcoin Forum
October 02, 2023, 04:22:58 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 25.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 »
1  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] 🔥 Maya Preferred 223 (MAPR) 🔥 Gold & Silver backed on: July 16, 2019, 01:53:14 PM
Maya Preferred 223 (MAPR) into the top 7 most expensive Cryptocurrency -

https://dailyhodl.com/2019/07/10/road-to-legendary-top-7-most-expensive-cryptocurrencies/
2  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] 🔥 Maya Preferred 223 (MAPR) 🔥 Gold & Silver backed on: July 04, 2019, 11:18:00 PM
We are now listed on Coinmarketcap https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/maya-preferred-223/




Maya Preferred 223 (MAPR) is now reaching a major barrier at 20k!

3  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Wirex IEO Pre-Sale is Another Crown Jewel in OKEx Launchpad Platform on: July 01, 2019, 09:50:32 PM
Great announcement this…. Keep going great luck
4  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] 🔥 Maya Preferred 223 (MAPR) 🔥 Gold & Silver backed on: July 01, 2019, 01:57:17 PM
Maya Preferred 223 (MAPR) is truly making the Crypto world "BETTER", check these -

https://www.nbc29.com/story/40720045/maya-preferred-223-backs-bitcoin-with-gold-and-silver

http://www.abnewswire.com/pressreleases/maya-preferred-223-does-what-no-other-cryptocurrency-has-ever-done-before_403224.html

http://www.abnewswire.com/pressreleases/all-media-sites-are-talking-about-maya-preferred-223-and-its-bitcoin-gold-and-silver-backing_403231.html
5  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: OKLink Launches Bitcoin Block Explorer as Rivals Mimic its USDK Stable Coin on: June 27, 2019, 02:30:09 AM
Not too much of a fan of OKlink.

I am almost tired of this stable coin like everyone wants it!!! Makes no sense,
6  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: WaykiChain’s Unique Stable Coin Will Bring Further Competition to the Market on: June 25, 2019, 07:15:12 PM
I thought "CHINA" has banned these stuff. Still going on???
7  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Maya Preferred 223 Backs Bitcoin With Gold And Silver on: June 24, 2019, 02:10:31 PM
Maya Preferred 223 remains a stable coin. Every token in this coin gets a support of about twenty-three thousand dollars worth of silver and gold. It is the first time for anything of this nature to appear on the internet. Maya Preferred 223 was launched last month and will help boost the crypto world efficiency. To be factual, the amusement and effectiveness of the coin is highly relating to bitcoin. 

One amazing thing about this crypto coin is that it has received appreciation since lunched last month. In the first month of launch alone, the price of Maya Preferred has risen to five hundred percent. Do you know that the Maya Preferred coin has better value than bitcoin? The actual price value of this coin today surpasses whatever you know about bitcoin. As bitcoin continues to experience some ups and downs, Maya Preferred is above 10,000 dollars and growing.

The value of this new and innovative cryptocurrency is a product of the support from silver and gold. The gold and silver that backs this digital asset comes from eight different sources in Mexico. The goal of Maya Preferred 223 creator is to boost the number of sources of gold and silver. It will help to increase the rate of producing the Maya Preferred coins to every user across the globe.

The UK Financial Limited is the registered organizer of the innovative crypto coin called Maya Preferred 223. The organizing firm for this digital currency is popular throughout the crypto world today. One great advantage of trusting the UK Financial Limited is their revolutionized creativity. The firm is currently backing its own assets with the best support that users deserve. Apart from that, the UK Financial Limited also has future plans to back and support other cryptocurrencies.

Another thing to know about the team at the UK Financial Limited is that the first cryptocurrency will be backed with its own token. It implies that bitcoin will soon be backed and supported with Maya Preferred 223 token. Will Maya Preferred 223 in conjunction with bitcoin revolutionize the crypto world? Without any iota of doubt, this new digital asset will change the face of the earth and how people do business. How is this possible? Well, the UK Financial Limited will make a transfer of twenty-three million Maya Preferred 223 tokens.

The tokens from the organizer will be placed in a secure escrow wallet. The amount is also the value of the bitcoin that miners will get. It implies that every bitcoin generated will be having about twenty-three million dollars worth in silver and gold. Join Maya Preferred 223 investment today and don’t miss out of its great benefits.

Watch the Video to know more:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JwPlukF7b6w

MAPR President Interview:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mJIxiaf-KhE
8  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: WaykiChain – The Innovation And Fresh Face Of The Crypto World: on: June 16, 2019, 06:38:19 PM
That what I called B2C.. Gate.io impressed me with no fee for listing I don't know why they doing that but it's totally fine guys KEEP UP A GOOD WORK NO MATTER WHAT
9  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] 🔥 Maya Preferred 223 (MAPR) 🔥 Gold & Silver backed on: May 03, 2019, 08:13:10 PM
Hello everyone, 

As we are working towards some major partnerships, we are already going into right track as MAPR is now "BETTER" than Bitcoin!



Once we reach up with some major partnerships in coming weeks and months, we are confident of it's reaching "DOUBLE" of the Bitcoin!

10  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] 🔥 Maya Preferred 223 (MAPR) 🔥 Gold & Silver backed on: April 29, 2019, 08:25:25 PM
Looks very consistent to what they are doing even after getting caught of the plagiarized whitepaper.  Once a project is tainted with red in bitcointalk and had been proven, a project may never really be trusted with all the PRs done. You just can't clean the slate with new whitepaper.

Never trade on fatbtc, might try after checking it.

I'm pretty amused with this project. The price in the exchange is quite expensive. It seems they have big whales behind this project. Though, plagiarizing is common nowadays but they should have been more careful because users will look for things that might ruin your hard work. Sometimes basic things are being neglected but those are the vital parts of the project.

Will be watching this project if they can sustain such value in the long run.



Firstly, we really appreciate your views, as we always take these things positively to improve. However, we will clarify that the issue was not exactly as some people made it into. They called us scam because of not giving reference to information that's used for explaining terms like what is blockchain and such. So on these basis we "SOME" people termed us scam. It's fine, it's not possible to change mindset of "SOME" people, especially those who have different intentions behind their theories.

Anyhow, the price is already showing where it is going to go! And as mentioned previously, this pretty much is the beginning. We will be in many more exchanges, and that will be real "FUN". 
11  Other / Meta / Re: @theymos your board sinking in chaos on: April 23, 2019, 09:34:10 PM
Big capitalized words don't make me want to read it. They have the opposite effect on your post. This is amplified by an order of magnitude when you bold it. Now, if you were to color it blue... that would certainly be an eyesore.
There is not a "HUGE" problem with the "SYSTEM", the only issue is that there is no "CHECK" on it.
Let's start with this statement.

You can appeal. In Reputation. And there have been instances in which DT members have disagreed with one another and countered the rating. Example: me, on multiple occasions.

Now what this means is that "PEOPLE" are FREE. Like someone said above, it almost gives "OPEN" opportunity to people to "GANG" up against ANYONE, who is even "CORRECT".
Show me an example of such a case where the red-trusted member was in the right.

Although, I believe some people here are genuinely "GREAT" in terms of their intention, but by large, there are more who are making life "HELL" for beginners here.
I agree. There exist many scammers frolicking across the forum.

The only "WISH" I ever have is that there should be proper "MODERATOR" super-mod like and he should be incharge along with the Admin to keep "CHECK" on members who have the "POWER" to give Feedbacks.
It's called DT1.

Just like we can "REPORT" posts, there should be "APPEAL" option against the feedback, where the said user should be able to add his opinion along with the proofs.
It's called Reputation.

Which should go "DIRECTLY" to the Admin and Mod. And then IF they consider that it's right, then not only the "APPEAL" should be rejected, but also the user gets "BANNED" for certain number of days/week/months. And in case the IF the "APPEAL" is proven "SUCCESSFUL, then the user who provided feedback should be "REMOVED" from that position or probably should be "GIVEN" warning along with asking to delete the Feedback.
And when we start getting threads of "my appeal was rejected??!?!?!" and false positives/negatives?

I am not going to be crazy and say Admin/Mod should be check every single such Appeal deeply, but probably could just take some overview of it.
Unfortunately the reality is that for a significant chunk of negative feedback, looking over the evidence will take an equally significant amount of time. I would know: I had to pore over a few hundred of Lauda's sent feedback.

But even just having "SUCH" system will "INSTALL" fear on such "BULLIES" that there is SOMETHING that can "STOP" them, as right now there is "NOTHING" that's there for it. And that's the reason why some people think they are "ADMIN" of this forum.
theymos has blacklist power.

I have "NOT" written a "LOVE" story that I want you to read, there is nothing much to read with me using the "BOLD" part, it was just done like that.

If you "LIKE" the appeal in that format, then why not have "REPORT" in same format?

If I begin showing "HOW" lovely some Feedback are then probably it will take days to get even 50% of it. And I am sorry I am not going to waste my time on that.



It's called DT1.

It's called Reputation.

So, basically you want to "TEACH" things here. Do you seriously think I am not aware of it? So, please talk sense if you can.


And when we start getting threads of "my appeal was rejected??!?!?!" and false positives/negatives?

An action by Admin or Mod is far more "RESPECTABLE" than done by these genius and self-claimed admins.

Lastly, IF you read my post "AGAIN" you should understand I NEVER said that it should be checked "DEEPLY", but just a moment of overview to see anything really wrong while there should be record of appeal against anyone, so if there are too many appeals against someone, then that person can be checked properly for once, at least.

While the "SYSTEM" I suggested automatically makes people "FEAR" to "APPEAL", as rejected one means "BAN" of certain time and similarly, it also install "FEAR" on the person who leaves feedback, as he too can "LOSE" his power.

That's how you keep "CHECK"

And I am not saying that just because "I" or "SOME" dislike the system that it should be done, but this is just "HOW" LIFE is.

Check the "WORLD" a country that doesn't have a proper "CHECK" system are suffering the most, while ones where there is check and balance, they are growing stronger and better.


12  Other / Meta / Re: @theymos your board sinking in chaos on: April 23, 2019, 08:29:13 PM
There is not a "HUGE" problem with the "SYSTEM", the only issue is that there is no "CHECK" on it.

Now what this means is that "PEOPLE" are FREE. Like someone said above, it almost gives "OPEN" opportunity to people to "GANG" up against ANYONE, who is even "CORRECT".

Although, I believe some people here are genuinely "GREAT" in terms of their intention, but by large, there are more who are making life "HELL" for beginners here.

The only "WISH" I ever have is that there should be proper "MODERATOR" super-mod like and he should be incharge along with the Admin to keep "CHECK" on members who have the "POWER" to give Feedbacks.

Just like we can "REPORT" posts, there should be "APPEAL" option against the feedback, where the said user should be able to add his opinion along with the proofs.

Which should go "DIRECTLY" to the Admin and Mod. And then IF they consider that it's right, then not only the "APPEAL" should be rejected, but also the user gets "BANNED" for certain number of days/week/months. And in case the IF the "APPEAL" is proven "SUCCESSFUL, then the user who provided feedback should be "REMOVED" from that position or probably should be "GIVEN" warning along with asking to delete the Feedback.

I am not going to be crazy and say Admin/Mod should be check every single such Appeal deeply, but probably could just take some overview of it.

But even just having "SUCH" system will "INSTALL" fear on such "BULLIES" that there is SOMETHING that can "STOP" them, as right now there is "NOTHING" that's there for it. And that's the reason why some people think they are "ADMIN" of this forum.

13  Other / Meta / Re: @theymos your board sinking in chaos on: April 23, 2019, 01:22:09 PM
I don't think suchmoon should get tagged for buying one of Bruno's accounts. Suchmoon does have a decent amount of trust, a lot of merit, and is on many people's trust lists. If someone was looking from the outside, and saw suchmoon do something, they would reasonably think, based on her stats that it would be acceptable to engage in similar behavior. Suchmoon is not the only person who has bought/sold forum accounts that can be described this way.

Except I didn't buy the account. But you're right, if this sets and example that it is acceptable to engage in similar behavior, i.e. help someone out and prevent them from doing something ill-advised - that's fantastic. And I don't mind getting red-trusted for it.

Be little bit more honest. You mind it, but you know you "WONT" get such tags, because people who are "BULLIES" here won't try to target someone like you, as that's not "HOW" they work.

The only "TARGETS" they have is people who "CANT" fight or if they even try, they have "ENOUGH" in the bag to trouble them further.

So why do you "SERIOUSLY" think these "WISE" head will pickup a "FIGHT" with someone like you, who can damage them "EQUALLY".

14  Other / Meta / Re: @theymos your board sinking in chaos on: April 23, 2019, 12:52:36 PM
Thanks to your shitty trust feedback and known abuse of a small group your board is sinking in total choas.
Rules which have no value.DT members red tagging for any shit they belive is legit EVEN the rules clearly allow it.

Soon there will be no more much members left which won't be tagged as scammers.

Its nice to see how massivly the amount of destroyed accounts increase.

Signature campaigns accepting negative trust because there are no more many left without negative trust.

Another campaign creating choas that people get tagged as scammers for promoting something where the other group says its a legit offer.

Your board is clearly sinking in total chaos and i guess in 6 months you will be able to count high ranked member accounts without negative ratings with your own fingers.


You are in my eyes clearly part of the abuse as its you who allow a small group to destroy massiv amount of legit accounts for something which is a joke expecially having forum rules for which people get their accounts destroyed when following them.

Your trustfeedback goes to an end and hopefully also the massiv abuse you let the community feel from a small group which are destroying accounts based on their mood and business interrest.

How many new campaign managers have camplained to have their accounts destroyed by some DT members who are themself campaign managers ?


Traffic of that forum is already massivly sinking when comparing with other crypto boards......


A clear decline of your shitty trust feedback which is the biggest shit you could ever implement when having such manipulative DT members on board.


Absolutely "AGREED", some of these people think they are making the forum "BETTER", but that's wrong and their intention is entirely different. It's fairly "COMMON" to see them "ABUSE" disrespect and do everything to a "NORMAL" member, as they feel they are "SUPERIOR" in every way.

I am sure "ADMIN" had this feedback system "ONLY" to make the forum better and to make people "STOP" doing something "WRONG".

But thanks to these people that "SYSTEM" has become irrelevant, in the finest way "POSSIBLE".

IF anyone needs to find logic then just "CHECK" the feedback that most people get. It will 90% have it from people who are "BLIND" followers or want to be in "GOOD" books of the big bullies, so if they see someone is "TAG" by that "BIG BULLY" they join in "BLINDLY", so rest it won't matter anything because no one is going to "ASK" them anything for this, instead there is "BIG" chance of them receiving "MERIT" for their NOBEL action.

So in short explanation, they basically "CLOSE" the door on faces of people who made "MISTAKE", and since they are not given chance to "CORRECT", they start caring "MINIMUM" for it and due to this the system is simply becoming useless, and I "BET" in next 6-8 months, it will become absolutely "MEANINGLESS".

And as said by Thule, soon there will be "NO ACCOUNT" left to tag, then these bullies will tag themselves!!!

I wonder how much drama would actually stop if the feedback system was removed (or negative feedback doesn't paint you 'red'). No more hilariousandco vs mdayonliner? No more Lauda vs Quickseller? No more Cryptohunter vs Everybody?
Quote
hilariousandco vs mdayonliner
It did not start for the feedback you left for me for the 21BTC escrow offer (which I admitted almost immediately when I realized it was a mistake from my side), it started when you desperately started to accuse me of the connection of other accounts. And your goat head is too big that you even did not realize it all those days? You will never be convinced (I guess) that those are not me and will never apology for that. Knowingly or unknowingly you are damaging the forum.

Don't blame the feedback system, blame the people who are misusing it.

I am sorry to disagree, but you got to "BLAME" the system. The reason you do is that it is created on "UNFAIR" grounds, as everything that works "WELL" in this world is one that has "BALANCE" and "CHECK" system.

Unfortunately, and really really unfortunately, with the "CURRENT" Feedback system, there is "NO CHECK", so it's like throwing "LOWER RANK" people in the cage of "HUNGRY WOLFS", they will eventually eat up "EVERYTHING".

The system has become a "JOKE" because of reasons already mentioned by many. YET unfortunately the "ADMIN" is BUSY in watching or ignoring.
15  Other / Meta / Re: Why Some Moderator is targeting my thread? on: April 23, 2019, 01:29:12 AM
We didn't posted any "BUMPS", all posts were having some information, but due to the "BIAS" moderator which is laying at the feet of bullies here "WANTED" our thread to "DIE" to make the "ALLEGATION" look true!

The amazing part is even the post made by the "USER pcfli" is deleted -

Your information is still there, it's been merged by moderators since you're too lazy to do it yourself. Say "thank you" and lock this thread.

pcfli is a Yobit spammer. Lots of those have been deleted and that has nothing to do with your conspiracy theories.

Although, there is alot to say. But I already said what was required to be said, so nothing else to add. I am closing it and locking it.
16  Other / Meta / Re: Why Some Moderator is targeting my thread? on: April 23, 2019, 01:06:00 AM
[mod note: post broke either rule 21 or 32 from - So no need to dig deep there.

The "WHY" "THE" "FUCK" did you create this thread? You either bumped it within 24h or didn't delete the previous bump. And you know exactly what you did, you time-wasting "SHITPOSTER".

Code:
Joseph R. Cord 2019-03-31 23:24:19
TimeTeller 2019-03-31 23:34:34
CjMapope 2019-04-01 00:29:44
TimeTeller 2019-04-02 09:30:46
tmfp 2019-04-02 21:21:29
Joseph R. Cord 2019-04-04 08:57:37
MayaPreferred223 2019-04-04 16:16:01
Avirunes 2019-04-04 16:44:17
Joseph R. Cord 2019-04-04 17:08:46
Avirunes 2019-04-04 17:30:08
Joseph R. Cord 2019-04-04 18:11:51
Joseph R. Cord 2019-04-05 21:14:09
IPVPIRL 2019-04-06 13:34:18
IPVPIRL 2019-04-06 13:50:44
frankjan 2019-04-06 14:39:36
sunil800 2019-04-06 18:00:13
alnasim 2019-04-06 18:22:15
KnightRiderus 2019-04-06 19:24:09
pvl958 2019-04-06 19:37:56
Joseph R. Cord 2019-04-06 21:51:55
tmfp 2019-04-06 22:14:10
CaVO32 2019-04-06 22:23:27
hamod2 2019-04-06 23:01:24
MCrenny 2019-04-07 09:08:36
Joseph R. Cord 2019-04-07 20:01:00
tmfp 2019-04-07 20:51:04
galvisdouglas 2019-04-08 01:44:20
Joseph R. Cord 2019-04-08 19:34:35
mif555 2019-04-09 16:11:47
Joseph R. Cord 2019-04-09 23:22:30
Twinkledoe 2019-04-09 23:44:44
tmfp 2019-04-10 17:14:53
Joseph R. Cord 2019-04-11 00:00:33
Joseph R. Cord 2019-04-11 00:06:52
Joseph R. Cord 2019-04-12 01:54:21
MayaPreferred223 2019-04-12 17:18:28
Tata12 2019-04-12 17:50:26
Joseph R. Cord 2019-04-12 18:15:26
pavlovi4 2019-04-13 01:00:00
MayaPreferred223 2019-04-15 09:40:45
MayaPreferred223 2019-04-15 11:35:37
TMARK446 2019-04-15 14:23:59
TMARK446 2019-04-15 14:25:06
cabron 2019-04-15 14:35:04
soixantedix 2019-04-15 14:50:59
Joseph R. Cord 2019-04-16 01:33:14
Joseph R. Cord 2019-04-17 02:24:08
Joseph R. Cord 2019-04-20 21:30:36
pcfli 2019-04-20 21:46:00
Joseph R. Cord 2019-04-23 00:08:28

Lol, so in a short case, "I" did wrong, whether it's by one way or the other, there is no "3RD" option at all Cheesy

Your language "SHOWS" rest of the stuff.

And the answer to what "I" said is "PROVEN" by what you posted.

IF anyone is "NOT" Blind, check this again -

Joseph R. Cord      2019-04-12 18:15:26
pavlovi4      2019-04-13 01:00:00
MayaPreferred223   2019-04-15 09:40:45
MayaPreferred223   2019-04-15 11:35:37
TMARK446      2019-04-15 14:23:59
TMARK446      2019-04-15 14:25:06
cabron         2019-04-15 14:35:04
soixantedix      2019-04-15 14:50:59
Joseph R. Cord      2019-04-16 01:33:14
Joseph R. Cord      2019-04-17 02:24:08
Joseph R. Cord      2019-04-20 21:30:36

pcfli         2019-04-20 21:46:00
Joseph R. Cord      2019-04-23 00:08:28

--------------------------------------------------------------------

4 Posts made each on "DIFFERENT" dates. This is not even "JUST" after 24 hours, "BEYOND" that.

We didn't posted any "BUMPS", all posts were having some information, but due to the "BIAS" moderator which is laying at the feet of bullies here "WANTED" our thread to "DIE" to make the "ALLEGATION" look true!

The amazing part is even the post made by the "USER pcfli" is deleted -

This was the post made by "PCFLI" - Hmm. Why do you have a negative trust on your profile? Are you scammer and tagged by default trust members?

So, basically not just "US", but "ANYONE" who tries to reply on our "THREAD" he is getting targeted.

A great strategy by bullies here to "HIRE" moderators for their own purposes!!!

If "ADMIN" still consider this all is "WELL" then yeah, all is well!!
17  Other / Meta / Re: Why Some Moderator is targeting my thread? on: April 23, 2019, 12:35:20 AM
You probably did "NOT" read my topic properly, I already mentioned that the rules were "FOLLOWED".

So you're saying that Mod is wrong this time? by deleting your thread without a valid reason, common men read it again.
you might be missing some important point here.  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=703657.0

[mod note: post broke either rule 21 or 32 from - So no need to dig deep there. BTW, please read carefully what's written by me instead of reading the "Title" and putting up random mod is right "FORMULA". It's the post, not the thread deleted.

Because you are lying scum:
Quote
Maya Preferred : The Best in Cryptocurrency Ever!!
Quote
Actually, ERC 23 tokens have been developed because of issues with ERC 20 tokens and therefore have an advantage over Bitcoin and many other tokens.
...sorry, silly me, that is not a reason.

Show us posts which are removed and someone will explain why they are removed. Don't keep us waiting.

Ok, so in pretty short and quick thing, if we consider "OURSELF" as Best then we are lying, as even to imagine something like that is "LYING" according to you.

You probably "CHART SHEET" every ICO/Cryptocurrency that consider themselves as the BEST in their own particular way.

On "PUBLIC" and your "DEMAND", here's one of the deleted post -




Can "ANYONE" tell me if we don't post updates like these on our "OWN" thread, then where exactly do we put this? Is this really "OFFTOPIC"?

You probably did "NOT" read my topic properly, I already mentioned that the rules were "FOLLOWED".
It seems that you are posting a plagiarism content which is not allowed here on the forum.
Check your trust feedback https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1719030

If you are bumping a thread you must delete old post before you bump a post again.

If your post is getting deleted it is not moderators fault I'm sure someone reported it that is why your post is always getting deleted.

It's really hard to answer to those who are not "INTERESTED" in knowing the scenario. You shouldn't reply if you are going to go with it "SEEMS", if you are sure please reply if not then why make "UNFAIR" comments?

The issue you pointed is "DIFFERENT" from what the thread is about.

If you don't read then what is my "FAULT", I clearly know the "RULE". I am sure it took you couple of minutes to wrote that, please "INVEST" that time into reading what I "WROTE".

It's not "SOMEONE" report, it's only "FEW" who can "REPORT", who "CERTAIN" mod is happy to listen to.
18  Other / Meta / Re: Why Some Moderator is targeting my thread? on: April 23, 2019, 12:11:01 AM
There's no such thing such as unfair approach towards you, You just need to read the rules and regulations over and over again so that you can understand how your topic is getting deleted, here are the rules and regulations read it again: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=703657.0

You probably did "NOT" read my topic properly, I already mentioned that the rules were "FOLLOWED".
19  Other / Meta / Why Some Moderator is targeting my thread? on: April 23, 2019, 12:01:37 AM
Hello everyone, I like to ask simple question. Why is some Moderator consistently targetting my thread - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5126669.20

There is no option to see "WHO" the moderator "IS" but we are getting targeted "CONSISTENTLY.

Whenever there is any news provided, our post is deleted or are merged with old post, so that no one sees it.

I like to ask the "ADMIN" whether the Mods are "BIAS" or what?

This is our ANN thread and how is sharing something about the company is offtopic?

We are not posting 10-15 times daily. There is posting only done when there is update or some important information to provide and that mostly is 24 or 36 hours after the previous one. Whenever there was any update made within 24 hours, the "EDIT" option was used.

So same question, "WHY" is Moderator is targeting this thread? Is it just "BECAUSE" we did not bow down to some people "HERE" or what?

Anyone can explain "WHY" this unfair approach towards us?

And "BEFORE" anyone puts the rule book here, "BEWARE" that I can add 10-15 links of the "THREAD", which are breaking a lot of rules but moderators are "FINE" but only we are the problem.
20  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] Maya Preferred 223 (MAPR) Gold & Silver backed on: April 17, 2019, 02:24:08 AM
For all our investors!!! This is the moment to jump with "JOY" we are truly becoming a trend now!

Check this out - https://athcoinindex.com/coin/maya-preferred-223





We have some "VERY" exciting story for all the users!! - https://coincheckup.com/blog/maya-preferred-223-sponsored/

Looks very consistent to what they are doing even after getting caught of the plagiarized whitepaper.  Once a project is tainted with red in bitcointalk and had been proven, a project may never really be trusted with all the PRs done. You just can't clean the slate with new whitepaper.

Never trade on fatbtc, might try after checking it.

It's easier to say certain things than to actually "DO". We are not trying to anything special. We are simply doing what is correct, and that's making sure we have the reference to sources we use.

If you don't trade on exchange we are listed, then I am "SORRY", you will have to skip a lot in coming months.


claim of being backed by gold and silver sounds very loud. Can we find somewhere translation into english of the document? https://mayapreferred.io/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/NOTARIO-2.pdf

That is okay, because people will always doubt things until it becomes big. So we do not expect anything different at all, and we are "FULLY" prepared because we know what we have is very "SPECIAL", and we will leave a lot on "TIME" to prove. But we certainly thank you for your interest.




While the majority continues to "STRUGGLE", we are here leading the way with becoming the "HIGHEST" priced Cryptocurrency!!!

We are running "BETTER" than Bitcoin!!!!

$6,000 per coin, 30,000 of volume, the website has ALL information that shows that "MAYA PREFERRED 223" is the genuine and the "FUTURE".



Now miss this at your "OWN" risk!!!
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!